Valuation by Simulation of Contingent Claims with Multiple Early Exercise Opportunities

This paper introduces the application of Monte Carlo simulation technology to the valuation of securities that contain many (buying or selling) rights, but for which a limited number can be exercised per period, and penalties if a minimum quantity is not exercised before maturity. These securities combine the characteristics of American options, with the additional constraint that only a few rights can be exercised per period and, therefore, their price depends also on the number of living rights (i.e., American-Asian-style payoffs), and forward securities. These securities give flexibility-of-delivery options and are common in energy markets (e.g., take-or-pay or swing options) and as real options (e.g., the development of a mine). First, we derive a series of properties for the price and the optimal exercise frontier of these securities. Second, we price them by simulation, extending the Ibanez and Zapatero (2004) method to this problem.

[1]  Eduardo S. Schwartz The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: Implications for valuation and hedging , 1997 .

[2]  D. Pilipović,et al.  Energy Risk: Valuing and Managing Energy Derivatives , 1997 .

[3]  S. Karlin,et al.  A second course in stochastic processes , 1981 .

[4]  Dawn Hunter,et al.  A stochastic mesh method for pricing high-dimensional American options , 2004 .

[5]  Patrick Jaillet,et al.  Valuation of Commodity-Based Swing Options , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[6]  P. Glasserman,et al.  A Sotchastic Mesh Method for Pricing High-Dimensional American Options , 2004 .

[7]  Jérôme Barraquand,et al.  Numerical Valuation of High Dimensional Multivariate American Securities , 1995, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[8]  P. Glasserman,et al.  Monte Carlo methods for security pricing , 1997 .

[9]  A. Lo,et al.  Implementing Option Pricing Models When Asset Returns are Predictable , 1994 .

[10]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Evaluating Natural Resource Investments , 1985 .

[11]  John C. Hull,et al.  Numerical Procedures for Implementing Term Structure Models I , 1994 .

[12]  Bruce D. Grundy,et al.  General Properties of Option Prices , 1996 .

[13]  Fernando Zapatero,et al.  Monte Carlo Valuation of American Options through Computation of the Optimal Exercise Frontier , 2000, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[14]  H. Bessembinder,et al.  Mean Reversion in Equilibrium Asset Prices: Evidence from the Futures Term Structure , 1995 .

[15]  A. C. Thompson Valuation of Path-Dependent Contingent Claims with Multiple Exercise Decisions over Time: The Case of Take-or-Pay , 1995, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[16]  Alan G. White,et al.  Efficient Procedures for Valuing European and American Path-Dependent Options , 1993 .

[17]  Francis A. Longstaff,et al.  Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach , 2001 .

[18]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Stochastic Convenience Yield and the Pricing of Oil Contingent Claims , 1990 .

[19]  Alexander J. Triantis,et al.  Capital Budgeting for Interrelated Projects: A Real Options Approach , 1998, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[20]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets , 1979 .

[21]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Electricity Prices and Power Derivatives: Evidence from the Nordic Power Exchange , 2000 .