Effects of pedestrian gait, vehicle-front geometry and impact velocity on kinematics of adult and child pedestrian head

The objective of the study is to investigate the effects of pedestrian gait, vehicle-front geometry and impact velocity on the dynamic responses of the head. The multi-body dynamic (MBD) models were used to simulate the head responses in vehicle to pedestrian collisions with different vehicle types in terms of head-impact point measured with Wrap Around Distance (WAD), head relative velocity and impact angle. Furthermore, the distribution of the head contact point on the vehicle fronts is analysed for a comparison of the contact point with the testing areas in the EEVC headform impactor test procedures. A simulation matrix is established using five vehicle types, two mathematical models of the pedestrians represented a 50th male adult and a 6-year-old child as well as seven pedestrian gaits based on typical postures in pedestrian accidents. In order to simulate a large range of impact conditions, four vehicle velocities (30 km/h, 40 km/h, 50 km/h and 60 km/h) are considered for each pedestrian position and vehicle type. The results indicated that the pedestrian gait and vehicle-impact velocity strongly influence head-impact condition. It is obvious that due to different vehicle-front geometry, the head-impact velocity, impact angle and head-impact point could be varied as well. This study provides suggestions for different head-impact conditions of subsystem test to the front part of different passenger vehicles.

[1]  Jikuang Yang,et al.  Logistic regression analysis of pedestrian casualty risk in passenger vehicle collisions in China. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.  Assessment of pedestrian head impact dynamics in small sedan and large SUV collisions , 2012 .

[3]  Jikuang Yang,et al.  Effects of Vehicle Impact Velocity and Front-End Structure on Dynamic Responses of Child Pedestrians , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[4]  Dietmar Otte,et al.  Pedestrian Impact Priorities Using Real-World Crash Data and Harm , 2004 .

[5]  Hamid M. Lankarani,et al.  Evaluation of the kinematics and injury potential to different sizes of pedestrians impacted by a utility vehicle with a frontal guard , 2011 .

[6]  Hirotoshi Ishikawa,et al.  SUMMARY OF IHRA PEDESTRIAN SAFETY WG ACTIVITIES (2005) - PROPOSED TEST METHODS TO EVALUATE PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION AFFORDED BY PASSENGER CARS , 2001 .

[7]  Guangyu Yang,et al.  Investigation of 184 passenger car–pedestrian accidents , 2010 .

[8]  Luis Martínez,et al.  Stiffness Corridors of the European Fleet for Pedestrian Simulations , 2007 .

[9]  J Yang,et al.  APROSYS European in-depth pedestrian database , 2007 .

[10]  Koji Mizuno,et al.  Finite element analysis of kinematic behaviour and injuries to pedestrians in vehicle collisions , 2012 .

[11]  Yutaka Okamoto,et al.  Pedestrian Head Impact Conditions Depending on the Vehicle Front Shape and Its Construction--Full Model Simulation , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[12]  Chen Huipeng,et al.  A Comparative Study Between China and IHRA for the Vehicle-Pedestrian Impact , 2009 .

[13]  Jingzhen Yang,et al.  Mathematical simulation of knee responses associated with leg fracture in car-pedestrian accidents , 1997 .

[14]  Jikuang Yang,et al.  A study of head–brain injuries in car-to-pedestrian crashes with reconstructions using in-depth accident data in China , 2010 .

[15]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  Crash reconstruction of pedestrian accidents using optimization techniques , 2009 .

[16]  Jack van Hoof,et al.  Improving pedestrian safety using numerical human models. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[17]  Per Lövsund,et al.  A Human-Body 3D Mathematical Model for Simulation of Car-Pedestrian Impacts , 2000 .

[18]  Xuejun Liu,et al.  A Study of Influences of Vehicle Speed and Front Structure on Pedestrian Impact Responses Using Mathematical Models , 2002 .