Particle motions near the bottom in turbulent flow in an open channel. Part 2

This study continues the investigation of particle motions near the bottom in a turbulent open channel flow, reported by Sumer & Oguz (1978; hereafter referred to as part 1). Paths of suspended heavy particles were recorded in three dimensions and in time, employing a stereo-photogrammetric system coupled with a stroboscope. In the case of smooth bottom, the measured kinematical quantities concerning the particle motions were found to be in accord with the available information on the ‘bursting process’. Agreement between the particle motion and the bursting process provided further support for the mechanism of particle suspension near the bottom proposed in part 1. Similar experiments were carried out when the bottom was rough. Comparison between the smooth- and rough-bottom cases could be made on the same basis as the flow Reynolds number as well as the particle properties were kept almost unchanged in both the smooth and rough boundary experiments. The observations showed that particle motions close to the rough bottom are very similar in character to those in the smooth-bottom case. The findings of the present paper suggested that the suspension mechanism given for the smooth-boundary flow could be extended to the rough-boundary case.

[1]  H. Eckelmann,et al.  Pattern-recognized structures in bounded turbulent shear flows , 1977, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  J. L. Lumley,et al.  Two-phase and non-Newtonian flows , 1975 .

[3]  Alex J. Sutherland,et al.  Proposed mechanism for sediment entrainment by turbulent flows , 1967 .

[4]  R. Brodkey,et al.  A visual investigation of the wall region in turbulent flow , 1969, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Robert S. Brodkey,et al.  A stereoscopic visual study of coherent structures in turbulent shear flow , 1978, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  F. Henderson Open channel flow , 1966 .

[7]  J. R. D. Francis,et al.  Saltation and suspension trajectories of solid grains in a water stream , 1977, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[8]  Mean velocity and longitudinal dispersion of heavy particles in turbulent open-channel flow , 1974 .

[9]  A visual study of turbulent shear flow , 1973 .

[10]  J. W. Elder The dispersion of marked fluid in turbulent shear flow , 1959, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  A. M. Binnie,et al.  The Mean Velocity of Discrete Particles in Turbulent Flow in a Pipe , 1955 .

[12]  Iehisa Nezu,et al.  Prediction of the contributions to the Reynolds stress from bursting events in open-channel flows , 1977, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  S. J. Kline,et al.  Combined dye-streak and hydrogen-bubble visual observations of a turbulent boundary layer , 1974, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  H. Eckelmann,et al.  Some properties of truncated turbulence signals in bounded shear flows , 1974, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  A. S. Monin,et al.  Statistical Fluid Mechanics: The Mechanics of Turbulence , 1998 .

[16]  R. G. Jackson,et al.  Sedimentological and fluid-dynamic implications of the turbulent bursting phenomenon in geophysical flows , 1976, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  T. J. Hanratty,et al.  Identification of turbulent wall eddies through the phase relation of the components of the fluctuating velocity gradient , 1974, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Stephen J. Kline,et al.  A proposed model of the bursting process in turbulent boundary layers , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  A. Grass Structural features of turbulent flow over smooth and rough boundaries , 1971, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.