Behavior of codecs for multicast video traffic using WAN test bed

In recent years there has been an exponential increase in the growth in multimedia applications, and in particular in video applications. Understanding the behavior of the video traffic and the requirements for the network helps network administrators to improve the traffic. In this work, a quantitative analysis is performed by experimentation, in order to evaluate the behavior and impact of video traffic on WAN networks. We propose a WAN test bed composed by a video traffic server and several client stations. This article introduces a scenario that allows to inject multicast video traffic, compressed with several codecs. From capturing video traffic, we identified several interesting performance metrics, such as multicast throughput, interframe space and frame size distributions, and the number of frames. We include detailed contributions on the impact produced by several factors, such as the configuration of the resolution of the video, the video class, the codec used for the compression, and the use of multicast traffic when there are restrictions on the bandwidth, as in a corporate real WAN link of some few Mbps. This study facilitates the comparison of the results with those obtained from analytical studies and modelling for different contexts.

[1]  Ahmad A. Mazhar,et al.  Comparative Study of Compression Techniques for Synthetic Videos , 2014 .

[2]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Network performance evaluation using frame size and quality traces of single-layer and two-layer video: A tutorial , 2004, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[3]  J. Campos,et al.  An evaluation of QoS for intensive video traffic over 802.11e WLANs , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (CONIELECOMP).

[4]  Satish K. Tripathi,et al.  On the characterization of VBR MPEG streams , 1997, SIGMETRICS '97.

[5]  Dmitri Loguinov,et al.  A Unified Traffic Model for MPEG-4 and H.264 Video Traces , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[6]  Harry G. Perros,et al.  A Survey of VBR Video Traffic Models , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[7]  Sunghyun Choi,et al.  Empirical analysis of video multicast over WiFi , 2011, 2011 Third International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN).

[8]  Dilip Sarkar,et al.  Modeling full-length video using Markov-modulated Gamma-based framework , 2003, TNET.

[9]  Aggelos Lazaris,et al.  Modeling multiplexed traffic from H.264/AVC videoconference streams , 2010, Comput. Commun..

[10]  Raj Kiran Addu,et al.  Effect of Codec Performance on Video QoE for videos encoded with Xvid, H.264 and WebM/VP8 , 2014 .

[11]  Detlev Marpe,et al.  Comparative assessment of H.265/MPEG-HEVC, VP9, and H.264/MPEG-AVC encoders for low-delay video applications , 2014, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[12]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Traffic and Quality Characterization of Single-Layer Video Streams Encoded with the H.264/MPEG-4 Advanced Video Coding Standard and Scalable Video Coding Extension , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[13]  Soam Acharya,et al.  Experiment to characterize videos stored on the Web , 1997, Electronic Imaging.

[14]  Bushra Anjum,et al.  A QoS evaluation of video traffic models for H.264 AVC video , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Next Generation Networks and Services (NGNS).

[15]  Chuanyi Ji,et al.  Modeling heterogeneous network traffic in wavelet domain , 2001, TNET.

[16]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  An experimental study of multimedia traffic performance in mesh networks , 2005, WiTMeMo '05.