Connecting the Dots in Public Management: Political Environment, Organizational Goal Ambiguity, and the Public Manager's Role Ambiguity

This article is a systematic effort to study a key theoretical question from the vantage point of public sector organizational behavior. Most political science models, with a primary interest in democratic control of bureaucracy, study the political influence on the bureaucracy from an agency theory perspective. Organization behavior literature, on the other hand, is focused largely on the study of individual-level phenomena in private organizations and does not incorporate political context as part of explanatory models. This article proposes a middle-range theory to "connect the dots," beginning with disparate sources in the polity influencing organizational goal ambiguity, which in turn is expected to increase managerial role ambiguity. An empirical test, using data collected from a national survey of managers working in state human service agencies, supports this theoretical model. We find that certain types of political influence have an impact on organizational goal ambiguity, which in turn has a direct effect in increasing role ambiguity and also an indirect effect in increasing role ambiguity through organizational structure.

[1]  G. D. Wagenheim,et al.  Customer Service in Public Administration , 1991 .

[2]  D. Boyd,et al.  The bursting state fiscal bubble and state Medicaid budgets. , 2003, Health affairs.

[3]  E. Welch,et al.  Beyond Stereotypes , 2005 .

[4]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  All Organizations Are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organization Theories. , 1988 .

[5]  Managing the public's business : the job of the government executive , 1982 .

[6]  B. Wright.  The Role of Work Context in Work Motivation: A Public Sector Application of Goal and Social Cognitive Theories , 2004 .

[7]  L. Hayduk.  Structural equation modeling with LISREL , 1987 .

[8]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[9]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  A Field of Strangers in Search of a Discipline: Separatism of Public Management Research from Public Administration@@@Public Management: The State of the Art , 1994 .

[10]  T. Moe.  The New Economics of Organization , 1984 .

[11]  ラッセル M. ロバ-ト.  情報公開10年の歩み--シンポジウムレポ-ト(訳)-2-情報の自由法の忠実な実施--ある行政部門における実際例(Public Administration Review,No.4 1979) , 1981 .

[12]  H. Aaron,et al.  How federalism could spur bipartisan action on the uninsured. , 2004, Health Affairs.

[13]  William M. Bowen,et al.  Impossible jobs in public management , 1992 .

[14]  K. Meier,et al.  Principal-agent models: a theoretical cul-de-sac , 2004 .

[15]  D. Waldo,et al.  The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration , 1948 .

[16]  H. Rainey,et al.  Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations , 1999 .

[17]  Sanjay K. Pandey,et al.  Exploring Public Sector Communication Performance: Testing a Model and Drawing Implications , 2006 .

[18]  Gerald Zeitz,et al.  Organizational Properties from Aggregate Data: Separating Individual and Structural Effects , 1980 .

[19]  H. Rainey,et al.  Goals, Rules, and Effectiveness in Public, Private, and Hybrid Organizations: More Evidence on Frequent Assertions About Differences , 1992 .

[20]  Robert E. Wright,et al.  The Venues of Influence: A New Theory of Political Control of the Bureaucracy , 1998 .

[21]  Gary L. Wamsley,et al.  The political economy of public organizations , 1973 .

[22]  H. George Frederickson.  The Repositioning of American Public Administration , 1999 .

[23]  T. Moe.  An Assessment of the Positive Theory of 'Congressional Dominance' , 1987 .

[24]  William P. Snyder.  A Theory of Public Bureaucracy: Politics, Personality, and Organization in the State Department . By Donald P. Warwick, with Marvin Meade and Theodore Reed. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard, 1975. Pp. xii + 252. $12.00.) , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[25]  M. Mead,et al.  A Theory of Public Bureaucracy: Politics, Personality, and Organization in the State Department. , 1977 .

[26]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Public Management Decision Making: Effects of Decision Content , 2004 .

[27]  James L. Perry,et al.  The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy , 1988 .

[28]  F. E. Rourke,et al.  Bureaucratic Dynamics: The Role Of Bureaucracy In A Democracy , 1994 .

[29]  Judith M. Collins,et al.  Jackson and Schuler (1985) Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Role Ambiguity, Role Conflict, and Job Performance , 2000 .

[30]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori , 2000 .

[31]  C. Grogan.  Federalism and Health Care Reform , 1993 .

[32]  Soonhee Kim,et al.  Participative Management and Job Satisfaction: Lessons for Management Leadership , 2002 .

[33]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Proverbs of Administration , 1946 .

[34]  B. Wright,et al.  Quantitative Research Measurement in Public Administration , 2004 .

[35]  B. Jones.  Bounded Rationality and Political Science: Lessons from Public Administration and Public Policy , 2003 .

[36]  R. Wright,et al.  Bureaucrats, Politics And the Environment , 2004 .

[37]  J. Jaccard,et al.  LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1998 .

[38]  Richard A. Harris,et al.  Organized Interests and American Political Development , 2002 .

[39]  Bradley E. Wright,et al.  Public-Sector Work Motivation: A Review of the Current Literature and a Revised Conceptual Model , 2001 .

[40]  H. Rainey,et al.  Goal Ambiguity in U.S. Federal Agencies , 2005 .

[41]  Gene A. Brewer.  In the Eye of the Storm: Frontline Supervisors and Federal Agency Performance , 2005 .

[42]  Alison Ritter,et al.  Speaking truth to power. , 2008, Drug and alcohol review.

[43]  John A. Worthley,et al.  A Perspective on the Challenge of Public Management: Environmental Paradox and Organizational Culture , 1981 .

[44]  M. Aiken,et al.  Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. , 1968 .

[45]  Robert J. House,et al.  Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behavior , 1972 .

[46]  S. Jackson,et al.  A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings , 1985 .

[47]  S. Pandey.  Assessing State Efforts to Meet Baby Boomers' Long-Term Care Needs , 2002, Journal of aging & social policy.

[48]  R. Gitelson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Correlates of Role Conflict and Ambiguity , 1983 .

[49]  Jone L. Pearce,et al.  Bringing Some Clarity to Role Ambiguity Research , 1981 .

[50]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[51]  Robert W. Backoff,et al.  Comparing Public and Private Organizations , 1976 .

[52]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Separating the effects of goal specificity from goal level , 1989 .

[53]  Mirko Noordegraaf,et al.  Management by Measurement? Public Management Practices Amidst Ambiguity , 2003 .

[54]  L. O'toole.  American Intergovernmental Relations , 2006 .

[55]  S. Kelman.  Making Public Policy: A Hopeful View Of American Government , 1987 .

[56]  T. Lowi.  End of Liberalism? , 2020, Neoliberal Nationalism.

[57]  Irit P. Erera.  Role Ambiguity in Public Welfare Organizations , 1989 .

[58]  James L. Koch,et al.  Influence of Organization Structure on Role Conflict and Ambiguity for Three Occupational Groupings. , 1979 .

[59]  Robert A. Dahl,et al.  Politics, Economics, and Welfare. , 1953 .

[60]  R. Behn.  The Big Questions of Public Management , 1995 .

[61]  H. Rainey,et al.  Public Agencies and Private Firms , 1983 .

[62]  Joseph J. Molnar,et al.  Organizational Antecedents of Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Top-Level Administrators. , 1976 .

[63]  Norton E. Long.  Power and Administration , 1949 .

[64]  Richard H. Hall,et al.  The Concept of Bureaucracy: An Empirical Assessment , 1963, American Journal of Sociology.

[65]  Kenneth J. Meier,et al.  Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government , 1979 .

[66]  S. Kelman.  Making Public Policy , 1988 .

[67]  R. Stillman.  The American bureaucracy : the core of modern government , 1996 .

[68]  M. Bhargava,et al.  Work alienation of marketing employees: Influence of task, supervisory, and organizational structure factors , 1993 .

[69]  Sanjay K. Pandey,et al.  Examining Red Tape in Public and Private Organizations: Alternative Explanations from a Social Psychological Model , 2000 .

[70]  B. Wright,et al.  Participation’s Influence on Job Satisfaction , 2004 .

[71]  S. Pandey,et al.  An Assessment of Maryland Medicaid’s Rare and Expensive Case Management Program , 2000, Evaluation & the health professions.

[72]  E. Lawler.  High-Involvement Management , 1986 .

[73]  S. Wolin,et al.  Politics and Vision , 1960, American Political Science Review.

[74]  H. Rainey.  Understanding and Managing Public Organizations , 1991 .

[75]  H. Simon,et al.  The Proverbs of Administration , 1946 .

[76]  K. Schedler,et al.  Dialogue on Definition and Evolution of the Field of Public Management , 2003 .

[77]  Chester A. Newland.  The Public Administration Review and Ongoing Struggles for Connectedness , 2000 .

[78]  C. Lindblom.  THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[79]  D. J. Abramis.  Work Role Ambiguity, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance: Meta-Analyses and Review , 1994 .

[80]  Sanjay K. Pandey,et al.  Testing How Management Matters in an Era of Government by Performance Management , 2004 .

[81]  Sanjay K. Pandey,et al.  Red Tape: A Review and Assessment of Concepts and Measures , 2002 .

[82]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Research Note: Public and Private Managers' Perceptions of Red Tape , 1995 .

[83]  Don A. Dillman,et al.  Mail and electronic surveys : the tailored design method , 2000 .

[84]  C. Grogan,et al.  Between Welfare Medicine and Mainstream Entitlement: Medicaid at the Political Crossroads , 2003, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[85]  Swee C. Goh,et al.  The Relationship of Organization Structure and Interpersonal Attitudes to Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Different Work Environments , 1983 .

[86]  J. Baldwin,et al.  Public versus Private: Not That Different, Not That Consequential , 1987 .

[87]  W. Siffin,et al.  Bureaucracy , 1971 .

[88]  H. Rainey,et al.  Public Management: Recent Research on the Political Context and Managerial Roles, Structures, and Behaviors , 1989 .

[89]  Charles J. McMillan,et al.  Change in Public Bureaucracies. , 1980 .

[90]  M. Fottler,et al.  Is management really generic? , 1981, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[91]  S. Pandey,et al.  The changing profile of the urban uninsured: Exploring implications of rise in the number of moderate-income uninsureds , 2004, Journal of Urban Health.

[92]  Scott Gates,et al.  Donut Shops and Speed Traps: Evaluating Models of Supervision on Police Behavior , 1993 .

[93]  John Brehm,et al.  Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public , 1997 .

[94]  Sanjay K. Pandey,et al.  Red Tape and Public Service Motivation , 2005 .

[95]  David W. Davis,et al.  Making Federalism Work , 1969 .

[96]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  Bureaucratic Structure and Personality , 1940 .

[97]  Role Stress Revisited: One or Two Constructs? , 1994 .

[98]  Young Han Chun,et al.  Public Service Performance: Consequences of goal ambiguity in public organizations , 2006 .

[99]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[100]  William T. Gormley,et al.  HCFA and the States: Politics and Intergovernmental Leverage , 2001, Journal of health politics, policy and law.