Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects

Recent experiments pairing a startling stimulus with a simple reaction time (RT) task have shown that when participants are startled, a prepared movement was initiated earlier in comparison to voluntary initiation. It has been argued that the startle acts to trigger the response involuntarily. However, an alternative explanation is that the decrease in RT may be due to stimulus intensity effects, not involuntary triggering. Thus the aim of the current investigation was to determine if RT simply declined in a linear fashion with increasing stimulus intensity, or if there was a point at which RT dramatically decreased. In the present experiment participants completed 50 active wrist extension trials to a target in response to an auditory stimulus of varying stimulus intensity (83–123 dB). The presented data show that RTs associated with a startle response are separate from stimulus intensity facilitated responses. Furthermore, this startle facilitation is more highly associated with sternocleidomastoid electromyographic (EMG) activity, rather than the EMG from the widely used startle response indicator muscle orbicularis oculi.

[1]  Michael Davis The Mammalian Startle Response , 1984 .

[2]  R. Woodworth,et al.  PSYCHIATRY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY , 1906 .

[3]  W. Levick Variation in the response latency of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1973, Vision research.

[4]  J C Rothwell,et al.  New observations on the normal auditory startle reflex in man. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  Paul W. Frankland,et al.  The acoustic startle reflex: neurons and connections , 1995, Brain Research Reviews.

[6]  Anthony N. Carlsen,et al.  Can prepared responses be stored subcortically? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Terry D. Blumenthal,et al.  Inhibition of the human startle response is affected by both prepulse intensity and eliciting stimulus intensity , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[8]  B. Cuthbert,et al.  Committee report: Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographic studies. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[9]  D L Kohfeld,et al.  Effects of the intensity of auditory and visual ready signals on simple reaction time. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[11]  Dinant A. Kistemaker,et al.  Control of Fast Goal-Directed Arm Movements : a critical evaluation of the equilibrium point hypothesis , 2006 .

[12]  J C Rothwell,et al.  Role of brainstem–spinal projections in voluntary movement , 2002, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[13]  D J Sanderson,et al.  Startle response of human neck muscles sculpted by readiness to perform ballistic head movements , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Robert C. Eaton,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Startle Behavior , 1984 .

[15]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Startle response is dishabituated during a reaction time task , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  Ian M Franks,et al.  Prepared Movements Are Elicited Early by Startle , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.