Novel decoupled framework for reliability-based design optimization of structures using a robust shifting technique

In a reliability-based design optimization (RBDO), computation of the failure probability (Pf) at all design points through the process may suitably be avoided at the early stages. Thus, to reduce extensive computations of RBDO, one could decouple the optimization and reliability analysis. The present work proposes a new methodology for such a decoupled approach that separates optimization and reliability analysis into two procedures which significantly improve the computational efficiency of the RBDO. This technique is based on the probabilistic sensitivity approach (PSA) on the shifted probability density function. Stochastic variables are separated into two groups of desired and nondesired variables. The three-phase procedure may be summarized as: Phase 1, apply deterministic design optimization based on mean values of random variables; Phase 2, move designs toward a reliable space using PSA and finding a primary reliable optimum point; Phase 3, applying an intelligent self-adaptive procedure based on cubic B-spline interpolation functions until the targeted failure probability is reached. An improved response surface method is used for computation of failure probability. The proposed RBDO approach could significantly reduce the number of analyses required to less than 10% of conventional methods. The computational efficacy of this approach is demonstrated by solving four benchmark truss design problems published in the structural optimization literature.

[1]  Rüdiger Rackwitz,et al.  Two basic problems in reliability-based structural optimization , 1997, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[2]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  A multi-material level set-based topology optimization of flexoelectric composites , 2018, 1901.10752.

[3]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Reliable design space and complete single-loop reliability-based design optimization , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  MULTITANGENT-PLANE SURFACE METHOD FOR RELIABILITY CALCULATION , 1997 .

[5]  Hans O. Madsen,et al.  A Comparison of Some Algorithms for Reliability Based Structural Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis , 1992 .

[6]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis , 1993 .

[7]  P. Das,et al.  Improved response surface method and its application to stiffened plate reliability analysis , 2000 .

[8]  G. Kharmanda,et al.  Efficient reliability-based design optimization using a hybrid space with application to finite element analysis , 2002 .

[9]  Babak Dizangian,et al.  A fast decoupled reliability-based design optimization of structures using B-spline interpolation curves , 2016 .

[10]  E. Polak,et al.  An Outer Approximations Approach to Reliability-Based Optimal Design of Structures , 1998 .

[11]  François Mariotti,et al.  Dose‐response analyses using restricted cubic spline functions in public health research , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  F. S. Wong,et al.  Slope Reliability and Response Surface Method , 1985 .

[13]  A. Sellier,et al.  Adaptive response surface method based on a double weighted regression technique , 2009 .

[14]  Michel Salaün,et al.  A new adaptive response surface method for reliability analysis , 2013 .

[15]  Christian Onof,et al.  An adaptive response surface method for reliability analysis of structures with multiple loading sequences , 2005 .

[16]  Liu Yinga Application of Stochastic Response Surface Method in the Structural Reliability , 2012 .

[17]  Mohammad Reza Ghasemi,et al.  HYBRID PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION, GRID SEARCH METHOD AND UNIVARIATE METHOD TO OPTIMALLY DESIGN STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES , 2017 .

[18]  H. Heinzl,et al.  Gaining more flexibility in Cox proportional hazards regression models with cubic spline functions. , 1997, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[19]  Carl de Boor,et al.  A Practical Guide to Splines , 1978, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[20]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Efficient Probabilistic Design , 2004, DAC 2002.

[21]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  A NEW STUDY ON RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1999 .

[22]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  RBSA and RBSA-OPT: Two computer programs for structural system reliability analysis and optimization , 1990 .

[23]  Wei-Xin Ren,et al.  Finite element model updating in structural dynamics by using the response surface method , 2010 .

[24]  Zhiping Qiu,et al.  An efficient response surface method and its application to structural reliability and reliability-basedoptimization , 2013 .

[25]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  Optimal fiber content and distribution in fiber-reinforced solids using a reliability and NURBS based sequential optimization approach , 2015 .

[26]  L. Faravelli Response‐Surface Approach for Reliability Analysis , 1989 .

[27]  R. Haftka,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization using probabilistic sufficiency factor , 2004 .

[28]  G. Wolberg,et al.  An energy-minimization framework for monotonic cubic spline interpolation , 2002 .

[29]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  Detection of material interfaces using a regularized level set method in piezoelectric structures , 2016 .

[30]  Babak Dizangian,et al.  An efficient method for reliable optimum design of trusses , 2016 .

[31]  Babak Dizangian,et al.  Ranked-Based Sensitivity Analysis for Size Optimization of Structures , 2015 .

[32]  Roham Rafiee,et al.  Uncertainties propagation in metamodel-based probabilistic optimization of CNT/polymer composite structure using stochastic multi-scale modeling , 2014 .

[33]  Mohsen Ali Shayanfar,et al.  Development of a GA-based method for reliability-based optimization of structures with discrete and continuous design variables using OpenSees and Tcl , 2014 .

[34]  Soo-Chang Kang,et al.  An efficient response surface method using moving least squares approximation for structural reliability analysis , 2010 .

[35]  V. Ho-Huu,et al.  An effective reliability-based improved constrained differential evolution for reliability-based design optimization of truss structures , 2016, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[36]  Alaa Chateauneuf,et al.  Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization , 2010 .

[37]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[38]  Babak Dizangian,et al.  Border-search and jump reduction method for size optimization of spatial truss structures , 2018, Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering.

[39]  Stéphane Bordas,et al.  Probabilistic multiconstraints optimization of cooling channels in ceramic matrix composites , 2015 .

[40]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  A level-set based IGA formulation for topology optimization of flexoelectric materials , 2017 .