A multifidelity method for locating aeroelastic flutter boundaries

This paper introduces a multifidelity method that can produce accurate estimates of the flutter boundary at a reduced cost by combining information from lowand high-fidelity aeroelastic models. Estimating the flutter boundary in the presence of non-linear aerodynamic phenomena is challenging because high-fidelity aeroelastic models are expensive to evaluate, and flutter analysis requires manymodel evaluations. On the other hand, relatively inexpensive approximate aeroelastic models (low-fidelity models) exist and are routinely applied to reduce the cost of estimating flutter, albeit with lower accuracy. The multifidelity method introduced here uses an active learning algorithm to leverage information from low-fidelity models. A multifidelity statistical surrogate is used to fit damping coefficient estimates computed with different aeroelasticmodels. This surrogate is used to estimate the uncertainty in the prediction of the flutter boundary, which drives the selection of new evaluations. The effectiveness of the multifidelity method is demonstrated by estimating the aeroelastic flutter boundary of a typical section model at a cost 85% lower when compared to the bisection method. Four aeroelastic models are considered in this example: three models (including the high-fidelity model) use a computational fluid dynamics solver based on the Euler equations, whereas one model uses a two-dimensional doublet-lattice method.

[1]  Max M. J. Opgenoord Transonic flutter prediction and aeroelastic tailoring for next-generation transport aircraft , 2018 .

[2]  I. Abel,et al.  An analytical technique for predicting the characteristics of a flexible wing equipped with an active flutter-suppression system and comparison with wind-tunnel data , 1979 .

[3]  L. Sirovich Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures , 1987 .

[4]  Max M. J. Opgenoord,et al.  Physics-Based Low-Order Model for Transonic Flutter Prediction , 2018 .

[5]  Jeffrey P. Thomas,et al.  Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Technique for Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamic Flows , 2000 .

[6]  Victor Picheny,et al.  Fast Parallel Kriging-Based Stepwise Uncertainty Reduction With Application to the Identification of an Excursion Set , 2014, Technometrics.

[7]  M. Eldred,et al.  Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions , 2008 .

[8]  João Luiz F. Azevedo,et al.  Numerical Calculation of Impulsive and Indicial Aerodynamic Responses Using Computational Aerodynamics Techniques , 2008 .

[9]  Eli Livne,et al.  Design-Oriented Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Unsteady Aerodynamics for Flight-Vehicle Aeroelastic Shape Optimization , 2015 .

[10]  Leifur T. Leifsson,et al.  Aeroelastic Flutter Prediction using Multi-fidelity Modeling of the Aerodynamic Influence Coefficients , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.

[11]  Matthias Poloczek,et al.  Multi-Information Source Optimization , 2016, NIPS.

[12]  A. Basudhar,et al.  An improved adaptive sampling scheme for the construction of explicit boundaries , 2010 .

[13]  George Michailidis,et al.  Sequential Experiment Design for Contour Estimation From Complex Computer Codes , 2008, Technometrics.

[14]  W. Rodden,et al.  A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows. , 1969 .

[15]  Marilyn J. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of time-domain damping identification methods for flutter-constrained optimization , 2019, Journal of Fluids and Structures.

[16]  Antonio Harrison Sánchez,et al.  Limit state function identification using Support Vector Machines for discontinuous responses and disjoint failure domains , 2008 .

[17]  Joseph Shang,et al.  Three decades of accomplishments in computational fluid dynamics , 2004 .

[18]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  CFD‐Based Nonlinear Computational Aeroelasticity , 2004 .

[19]  Jeffrey P. Thomas,et al.  Modeling Viscous Transonic Limit Cycle Oscillation Behavior Using a Harmonic Balance Approach , 2002 .

[20]  Berend G. van der Wall,et al.  The HART II international workshop: an assessment of the state of the art in CFD/CSD prediction , 2013 .

[21]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  CFD on moving grids: from theory to realistic flutter, maneuvering, and multidisciplinary optimization , 2005 .

[22]  Karen Willcox,et al.  Multifidelity Optimization using Statistical Surrogate Modeling for Non-Hierarchical Information Sources , 2015 .

[23]  G. Hou,et al.  Numerical Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction — A Review , 2012 .

[24]  William P. Rodden,et al.  Refinement of the nonplanar aspects of the subsonic doublet-lattice lifting surface method. , 1972 .

[25]  Jack J. McNamara,et al.  Efficient Fluid-Thermal-Structural Time Marching with Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2018, AIAA Journal.

[26]  Ling Li,et al.  Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure , 2010, Statistics and Computing.

[27]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Assessment of the fluid-structure interaction capabilities for aeronautical applications of the open-source solver SU2. , 2016 .

[28]  Her Mann Tsai,et al.  Calculation of Wing Flutter by a Coupled Fluid-Structure Method , 2001 .

[29]  H. Dunn An analytical technique for approximating unsteady aerodynamics in the time domain , 1980 .

[30]  Karen Willcox,et al.  Contour location via entropy reduction leveraging multiple information sources , 2018, NeurIPS.

[31]  Karen Willcox,et al.  A Survey of Projection-Based Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Dynamical Systems , 2015, SIAM Rev..

[32]  Walter A. Silva,et al.  Application of nonlinear systems theory to transonic unsteady aerodynamic responses , 1993 .

[33]  David Cohn,et al.  Active Learning , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[34]  K. L. Roger,et al.  Airplane Math Modeling Methods for Active Control Design , 1977 .

[35]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[36]  J. Alonso,et al.  SU2: An Open-Source Suite for Multiphysics Simulation and Design , 2016 .

[37]  Karen Willcox,et al.  Methodology for Dynamic Data-Driven Online Flight Capability Estimation , 2015 .

[38]  Victor Picheny,et al.  Adaptive Designs of Experiments for Accurate Approximation of a Target Region , 2010 .

[39]  P. Holmes,et al.  The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows , 1993 .

[40]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Rates of Convergence for Sparse Variational Gaussian Process Regression , 2019, ICML.

[41]  W. Eversman,et al.  Consistent Rational-Function Approximation for Unsteady Aerodynamics , 1991 .

[42]  Hermann J. Hassig,et al.  An Approximate True Damping Solution of the Flutter Equation by Determinant Iteration , 1971 .

[43]  Ken Badcock,et al.  Transonic aeroelastic stability analysis using a kriging–based schur complement formulation , 2010 .

[44]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Modeling of Fluid-Structure Interaction , 2001 .

[45]  Adam Jirasek,et al.  Overview and Data Comparisons from the 2ndAeroelastic Prediction Workshop , 2016 .

[46]  William P. Rodden,et al.  Subsonic Steady and Oscillatory Aerodynamics for Multiple Interfering Wings and Bodies , 1972 .

[47]  Koji Isogai,et al.  On the Transonic-Dip Mechanism of Flutter of a Sweptback Wing , 1979 .

[48]  P. Beran,et al.  Reduced-order modeling: new approaches for computational physics , 2004 .

[49]  L. Sirovich TURBULENCE AND THE DYNAMICS OF COHERENT STRUCTURES PART I : COHERENT STRUCTURES , 2016 .

[50]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  A Modern Course in Aeroelasticity , 1981, Solid Mechanics and Its Applications.

[51]  P. Beran,et al.  A multifidelity approach for the construction of explicit decision boundaries: application to aeroelasticity , 2010 .

[52]  João Luiz F. Azevedo,et al.  A z-Transform Discrete-Time State-Space Formulation for Aeroelastic Stability Analysis , 2007 .

[53]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations , 2008 .

[54]  Samy Missoum,et al.  Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Nonlinear Aeroelasticity Problems , 2010 .

[55]  Ken Badcock,et al.  Transonic Aeroelastic Instability Searches Using Sampling and Aerodynamic Model Hierarchy , 2011 .

[56]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Fully-implicit time-marching aeroelastic solutions , 1994 .

[57]  Mark Drela,et al.  INTEGRATED SIMULATION MODEL FOR PRELIMINARY AERODYNAMIC, STRUCTURAL, AND CONTROL-LAW DESIGN OF AIRCRAFT , 1999 .

[58]  V B Venkayya,et al.  Automated Structural Optimization System (ASTROS). Volume 1. Theoretical Manual , 1988 .

[59]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Stochastic Gust Analysis Techniques for Aircraft Conceptual Design , 2008 .

[60]  Jinglai Li,et al.  Gaussian process surrogates for failure detection: A Bayesian experimental design approach , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[61]  Jennifer Heeg,et al.  Overview and Lessons Learned from the Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop , 2013 .

[62]  Christopher K. I. Williams,et al.  Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning) , 2005 .