An alternative definition of the scapular coordinate system for use with RSA.

When performing radiostereometric analysis (RSA), computed tomography scans are often taken to obtain the landmarks used to create anatomical coordinate systems (CSs) for quantifying joint kinematics. Different conventions for defining CSs lead to an inability to compare results among studies. The International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) has proposed a set of CSs; however, the landmarks needed to create the recommended scapular CS require the entire scapula to be scanned, thereby also exposing breast and other tissues to radiation. The main purpose of this work was to investigate an alternate definition of the CS that has repeatably attainable landmarks and axes as close as possible to those recommended by the ISB, while limiting the portion of the scapula requiring scanning. Intra- and inter-investigator variabilities of landmark digitization were quantified in one model of a scapula and one cadaveric specimen. Based on the variability of the digitizations, an alternative CS was defined. The differences between the ISB and alternative CSs were evaluated on 11 cadaveric specimens. Beaded biplanar RSA was performed on the glenohumeral joint model in 15 different configurations and the resulting kinematics were calculated for each set of landmark digitizations using both sets of coordinate systems. While the kinematic angles obtained using the alternative CS were statistically different from those obtained using the ISB standard, these differences were small (on the order of 5 degrees) and therefore considered to be of little clinical significance. In all likelihood, the benefits of decreasing radiation exposure outweigh these differences in angles.

[1]  Jurriaan H. de Groot The variability of shoulder motions recorded by means of palpation. , 1997 .

[2]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  Three-dimensional scapular kinematics and scapulohumeral rhythm in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis or frozen shoulder. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  William Hoff,et al.  In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Scott Tashman,et al.  Validation of three-dimensional model-based tibio-femoral tracking during running. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  Scott Tashman,et al.  Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Accuracy of Biplane X-ray Imaging Combined with Model-based Tracking for Measuring In-vivo Patellofemoral Joint Motion , 2022 .

[6]  U P Wyss,et al.  Arm motion and load analysis of sit-to-stand, stand-to-sit, cane walking and lifting. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  James A. Johnson,et al.  The effect of muscle loading on the kinematics of in vitro glenohumeral abduction. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  J. Miedler,et al.  Quantitative anatomy of the scapula. , 2000, American journal of orthopedics.

[10]  F C van der Helm,et al.  In vivo estimation of the glenohumeral joint rotation center from scapular bony landmarks by linear regression. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Jaap Harlaar,et al.  Complete 3D kinematics of upper extremity functional tasks. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[12]  Angela E Kedgley,et al.  Comparative accuracy of radiostereometric and optical tracking systems. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  A R Karduna,et al.  Scapular kinematics: effects of altering the Euler angle sequence of rotations. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Scott Tashman,et al.  Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  Gunnar Flivik,et al.  Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[16]  G R Johnson,et al.  A framework for the definition of standardized protocols for measuring upper-extremity kinematics. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.