Bayesian Updating and Model Class Selection of Deteriorating Hysteretic Structural Models using Seismic Response Data

Identification of structural models from measured earthquake response can play a key role in structural health monitoring, structural control and improving performance-based design. System identification using data from strong seismic shaking is complicated by the nonlinear hysteretic response of structures where the restoring forces depend on the previous time history of the structural response rather than on an instantaneous finite-dimensional state. Furthermore, this inverse problem is ill-conditioned because even if some components in the structure show substantial yielding, others will exhibit nearly elastic response, producing no information about their yielding behavior. Classical least-squares or maximum likelihood estimation will not work with a realistic class of hysteretic models because it will be unidentifiable based on the data. On the other hand, Bayesian updating and model class selection provide a powerful and rigorous approach to tackle this problem when implemented using Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation methods such as the Metropolis-Hastings, Gibbs Sampler and Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithms. The emergence of these stochastic simulation methods in recent years has led to a renaissance in Bayesian methods across all disciplines in science and engineering because the high-dimensional integrations that are involved can now be readily evaluated. The power of these methods to handle ill-conditioned or unidentifiable system identification problems is demonstrated by using a recently-developed stochastic simulation algorithm, Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo, to perform Bayesian updating and model class selection on a class of Masing hysteretic structural models that are relatively simple yet can give realistic responses to seismic loading. Examples will be given using deteriorating hysteretic building models with simulated seismic response data.

[1]  J. Beck,et al.  Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical Framework , 1998 .

[2]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2005, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[3]  S. Gull Bayesian Inductive Inference and Maximum Entropy , 1988 .

[4]  Paramsothy Jayakumar,et al.  Modeling and Identification in Structural Dynamics , 1987 .

[5]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Updating of a Model and its Uncertainties Utilizing Dynamic Test Data , 1991 .

[6]  Wilfred D. Iwan,et al.  Nonlinear system identification based on modelling of restoring force behaviour , 1989 .

[7]  L. M. M.-T. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[8]  G. Masing,et al.  Eigenspannungen und Verfestigung beim Messing , 1926 .

[9]  Dar-Yun Chiang Parsimonious modeling of inelastic systems , 1992 .

[10]  W. Iwan A Distributed-Element Model for Hysteresis and Its Steady-State Dynamic Response , 1966 .

[11]  J. Beck,et al.  Bayesian Updating of Structural Models and Reliability using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation , 2002 .

[12]  J. Ching,et al.  Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Bayesian Model Updating, Model Class Selection, and Model Averaging , 2007 .

[13]  James L. Beck,et al.  System Identification Using Nonlinear Structural Models , 1988 .

[14]  J. Beck,et al.  Model Selection using Response Measurements: Bayesian Probabilistic Approach , 2004 .

[15]  R. Baierlein Probability Theory: The Logic of Science , 2004 .

[16]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  A parametric identification scheme for non‐deteriorating and deteriorating non‐linear hysteretic behaviour , 2006 .

[17]  James L. Beck,et al.  Bayesian Linear Structural Model Updating using Gibbs Sampler with Modal Data , 2005 .

[18]  James L. Beck,et al.  Statistical System Identification of Structures , 1989 .