Preserving the mask integrity for the lithography process

The optical performance stability of a photomask is one of the most critical factors in the photolithography process and stringent specifications create greater challenges with each advancing technology node. Throughout its lifetime, a photomask is exposed to a variety of cleaning cycles. It is essential that the integrity of the mask is preserved throughout each of these processes. Standard mask cleaning treatments include surface preparation with 172nm VUV for better wetting, organic resist/particle removal with aqueous ozone (DIO3) and residual ion removal for haze control. However, high energy radiations from 172nm VUV have been reported to cause overlay shift and wet oxidizing chemistries adversely affect mask CD and optical properties, ultimately influencing lithography performance. Previously, HamaTech APE successfully demonstrated an advanced cleaning method using photolyzed DIO3 with minimal metal layer damage. In this paper, performance of different media under the UV photolysis effect is explored for various steps in the cleaning process. Photolyzed DI water based surface preparation of photomask under atmospheric conditions without any overlay shift is demonstrated. Alternative chemicals with higher photolysis rates are explored for resist stripping applications. Phase/Transmission and CD change on a PSM (Phase Shift Mask) are compared between regular and modified processes. Potential improvements in residual ion removal using combination of radiation and hot DI water are also presented.

[1]  Ted Liang,et al.  50nm particle removal from EUV mask blank using standard wet clean , 2009, Photomask Technology.

[2]  Franklin D. Kalk,et al.  Photomask defectivity and cleaning : A new milieu , 2007 .

[3]  D. Martin Knotter,et al.  A Novel Resist and Post-Etch Residue Removal Process Using Ozonated Chemistry , 1998 .

[4]  Frank Laske,et al.  Experimental test results of pattern placement metrology on photomasks with laser illumination source designed to address double patterning lithography challenges , 2009, Photomask Technology.

[5]  Uwe Dietze,et al.  Automated imprint mask cleaning for step-and-flash imprint lithography , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Fei Xu,et al.  Improving photomask surface properties through a combination of dry and wet cleaning steps , 2004, Photomask Japan.

[7]  Takayuki Toshima,et al.  Novel photoresist stripping technology using ozone/vaporized water mixture , 2003 .

[8]  Yasutaka Morikawa,et al.  Pattern decomposition for double patterning from photomask viewpoint , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Uwe Dietze,et al.  Techniques for removal of contamination from EUVL mask without surface damage , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Ted Liang,et al.  Chemical durability studies of Ru-capped EUV mask blanks , 2008, Photomask Technology.

[11]  Yuan Zhang,et al.  Haze prevention and phase/transmission preservation through cleaning process optimization , 2005, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[12]  E. Oliveros,et al.  Vacuum-ultraviolet photolysis of aqueous reaction systems , 2004 .

[13]  Uwe Dietze,et al.  Study on surface integrity in photomask resist strip and final cleaning processes , 2009, Photomask Japan.