Have you been served? The impact of university entrepreneurial support on start-ups’ network formation

University-based entrepreneurial support organizations devote increasing efforts to create a context and opportunities for interaction among start-up firms. The basic assumption behind these efforts is that networks facilitate access to knowledge and resources and increase the chances of success for start-ups. However, the mechanisms that facilitate the creation of business ties with other members of the same community are yet to be identified and empirically tested. This paper leverages the social network and firm incubator literatures to hypothesize and test mechanisms that create the context and opportunity for business interaction among member firms within one university-based entrepreneurial support organization. The study uses the empirical setting of a large, university based support organization and the sample includes firms with different levels of membership-support. This empirical context allows us to compare different levels of membership-support and identify the dimensions that have greater impacts on a firm’s opportunity to establish ties with other members. The results reveal that geographical proximity, ad-hoc service support including shared space, and a larger community of member and graduate firms to which network ties may be formed increases the chance of connecting with other past or current member firms.

[1]  Jeroen P.J. de Jong,et al.  Market novelty, competence-seeking and innovation networking , 2009 .

[2]  Raymond W. Smilor,et al.  Managing the incubator system: Critical success factors to accelerate new company development , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[3]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Excess Zeros in Count Models for Recreational Trips , 1996 .

[4]  R. Ireland,et al.  Stimulating dynamic value: social capital and business incubation as a pathway to competitive success , 2007 .

[5]  Albert N. Link,et al.  A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Decision to Locate on a University Research Park , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[6]  Knut Senneseth,et al.  A Panel Study of Firm Growth among SMEs in Networks , 2001 .

[7]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[8]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[9]  Johannes Glückler Economic Geography and the Evolution of Networks , 2007 .

[10]  Ha Hoang,et al.  Network-based research in entrepreneurship A critical review , 2003 .

[11]  Danny P. Soetanto,et al.  Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms , 2013 .

[12]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks , 1986 .

[13]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Cooperative or Controlling? The Effects of CEO-Board Relations and the Content of Interlocks on the Formation of Joint Ventures , 1999 .

[14]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  M. Mizruchi What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates , 1996 .

[16]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Cooperation and Compromise: A Network Response to Conflicting Institutional Pressures in Community Mental Health , 2004 .

[17]  Nicole Coviello,et al.  Entrepreneurship Research on Network Processes: A Review and Ways Forward , 2010 .

[18]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications , 1986 .

[19]  Bruno Moriset,et al.  Building new places of the creative economy: the rise of coworking spaces , 2013 .

[20]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  High tech start-ups in University Science Park incubators: The relationship between the start-up’s lifecycle progression and use of the incubator’s resources , 2008 .

[21]  J. Brüderl,et al.  Network Support and the Success of Newly Founded Business , 1998 .

[22]  Pamela R. Haunschild Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity , 1993 .

[23]  S. Sivo,et al.  Do graduated university incubator firms benefit from their relationship with university incubators? , 2016 .

[24]  J. Aram,et al.  Networking and growth of young technology-intensive ventures in China☆ , 1995 .

[25]  Hans Löfsten,et al.  R&D networks and product innovation patterns—academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on Science Parks , 2005 .

[26]  A. Stinchcombe Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[27]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Opening the ivory tower's door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies , 2005 .

[28]  Brad Feld,et al.  Startup Communities: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Your City , 2012 .

[29]  Holk Cruse,et al.  Introduction to Volume 1 , 2000 .

[30]  Johanna L. Francis,et al.  Creating a Cluster While Building a Firm: Entrepreneurs and the Formation of Industrial Clusters , 2005 .

[31]  Carmen Camelo-Ordaz,et al.  Key resources and actors for the evolution of academic spin-offs , 2015 .

[32]  G. Homans The human group , 1952 .

[33]  W. Hulsink,et al.  Networks in Entrepreneurship: The Case of High-technology Firms , 2001 .

[34]  H. Sherman,et al.  Methodological Challenges in Evaluating Business Incubator Outcomes , 1998 .

[35]  C. Vedovello Science parks and university-industry interaction: Geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force , 1997 .

[36]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  ‘Old Economy’ Inputs for ‘New Economy’ Outcomes: Cluster Formation in the New Silicon Valleys , 2001 .

[37]  Yi Yang,et al.  Nascent Entrepreneurs Access and Use of Network Resources in a Technology Incubator , 2012 .

[38]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Second-Order Imitation: Uncovering Latent Effects of Board Network Ties , 2001 .

[39]  C. Oliver,et al.  Organizations Working Together , 1992 .

[40]  E. Ostrom A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997 , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[41]  M. Sarkar,et al.  Alliance entrepreneurship and firm market performance , 2001 .

[42]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Specialization as strategy for business incubators: An assessment of the Central German Multimedia Center , 2008 .

[43]  Willem Hulsink,et al.  Networking by Entrepreneurs: Patterns of Tie—Formation in Emerging Organizations , 2007 .

[44]  Dan Breznitz,et al.  The communal roots of entrepreneurial–technological growth – social fragmentation and stagnation: reflection on Atlanta's technology cluster , 2014 .

[45]  B. Clarysse,et al.  The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations , 2012 .

[46]  R. Huggins,et al.  Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory , 2015, Small Business Economics.

[47]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[48]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Architecting gloCal (global–local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices , 2005 .

[49]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Social Capital and Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[50]  R. Gulati Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[51]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Cooperation patterns of incubator firms and the impact of incubator specialization: Empirical evidence from Germany , 2010 .

[52]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Networked incubators. Hothouses of the new economy. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[53]  Mike Wright,et al.  The Effectiveness of University Knowledge Spillovers: Performance Differences between University Spinoffs and Corporate Spinoffs , 2011 .

[54]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Catalyzing Strategies and Efficient Tie Formation: How Entrepreneurial Firms Obtain Investment Ties , 2012 .

[55]  Maximilian von Zedtwitz,et al.  Are Service Profiles Incubator-Specific? Results from an Empirical Investigation in Italy* , 2006 .

[56]  Edward O. Laumann,et al.  Community Structure as Interorganizational Linkages , 1978 .

[57]  Anne Bøllingtoft,et al.  The bottom-up business incubator: Leverage to networking and cooperation practices in a self-generated, entrepreneurial-enabled environment , 2012 .

[58]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing , 1999, The New Economic Sociology.

[59]  Ali J. Ahmad,et al.  Relationships matter: case study of a university campus incubator , 2011 .

[60]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[61]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures , 2007 .

[62]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research , 2005 .

[63]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox , 2012 .

[64]  K. Motohashi,et al.  Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative?: Evidence from Taiwan , 2009 .

[65]  Stacey L. Connaughton,et al.  Motivations and obstacles to networking in a university business incubator , 2012 .

[66]  Andrea L. Larson Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships , 1992 .

[67]  Albert N. Link,et al.  The Growth of Research Triangle Park , 2003 .

[68]  R. Aernoudt Incubators: Tool for Entrepreneurship? , 2004 .

[69]  Mark S. Granovetter The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes Social Networks and Economic Outcomes: Core Principles , 2022 .

[70]  M. McAdam,et al.  Building Futures or Stealing Secrets? , 2007 .

[71]  A. McGahan,et al.  How Open System Intermediaries Address Institutional Failures: The Case of Business Incubators in Emerging-Market Countries , 2016 .

[72]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive Industries , 2009 .

[73]  J. Ulhøi,et al.  The Networked Business Incubator: Leveraging Entrepreneurial Agency , 2005 .

[74]  Yi Tang,et al.  Which signal to rely on? The impact of the quality of board interlocks and inventive capabilities on research and development alliance formation under uncertainty , 2013 .

[75]  B. Kogut,et al.  Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry , 1994 .

[76]  Joris J. Ebbers Networking Behavior and Contracting Relationships among Entrepreneurs in Business Incubators , 2014 .

[77]  Sarfraz A. Mian University's involvement in technology business incubation: what theory and practice tell us? , 2011 .