Abstract In a foraging column of the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes, minim workers (the smallest worker subcaste) “hitchhike” on leaf fragments carried by larger workers. It has been demonstrated that they defend leaf carriers against parasitic phorid flies. The present study examines the cues used by the potential hitchhikers to locate leaf carriers. As recently reported, foraging workers stridulate while cutting a leaf fragment, and the stridulatory vibrations serve as closerange recruitment signals. We tested the hypothesis that these plant-borne stridulatory vibrations are used by the potential hitchhikers to locate workers engaged in cutting. Three different lines of evidence support this view. Firstly, the repetition rate of the stridulations produced by foraging workers increases significantly as foragers maneuver the leaf fragment into the carrying position and walk loaded to the nest. This is the moment when hitchhikers usually climb on the leaf. Although the leaf-borne stridulatory vibrations are considerably attenuated when transmitted through the workers' legs, they can nevertheless be detected at short distances by minims. This subcaste is several times more sensitive to substrate-borne vibrations than larger workers. Secondly, when a “stridulating” and a “silent” leaf were simultaneously presented at the foraging site, minim workers spent significantly more time on the stridulating than on the silent leaf. Thirdly, hitchhiking was more frequent in leaf carriers which cut fragments out of the stridulating leaf than in those cutting the silent leaf.Abstract In a foraging column of the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes, minim workers (the smallest worker subcaste) “hitchhike” on leaf fragments carried by larger workers. It has been demonstrated that they defend leaf carriers against parasitic phorid flies. The present study examines the cues used by the potential hitchhikers to locate leaf carriers. As recently reported, foraging workers stridulate while cutting a leaf fragment, and the stridulatory vibrations serve as closerange recruitment signals. We tested the hypothesis that these plant-borne stridulatory vibrations are used by the potential hitchhikers to locate workers engaged in cutting. Three different lines of evidence support this view. Firstly, the repetition rate of the stridulations produced by foraging workers increases significantly as foragers maneuver the leaf fragment into the carrying position and walk loaded to the nest. This is the moment when hitchhikers usually climb on the leaf. Although the leaf-borne stridulatory vibrations are considerably attenuated when transmitted through the workers' legs, they can nevertheless be detected at short distances by minims. This subcaste is several times more sensitive to substrate-borne vibrations than larger workers. Secondly, when a “stridulating” and a “silent” leaf were simultaneously presented at the foraging site, minim workers spent significantly more time on the stridulating than on the silent leaf. Thirdly, hitchhiking was more frequent in leaf carriers which cut fragments out of the stridulating leaf than in those cutting the silent leaf.
[1]
M. Orr.
Parasitic flies (Diptera: Phoridae) influence foraging rhythms and caste division of labor in the leaf-cutter ant, Atta cephalotes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
,
1992,
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[2]
Die Verstndigung durch Stridulationssignale bei Blattschneiderameisen@@@Communication by stridulatory signals in leaf cutting ants: III. Die Empfindlichkeit fr Substratvibrationen@@@III. The sensitivity to substrate vibrations
,
1970
.
[3]
E. Hodgson.
An Ecological Study of the Behavior of the Leaf‐Cutting Ant Atta Cephalotes
,
1955
.
[4]
J. M. Cherrett.
Some factors involved in the selection of vegetable substrate by Atta cephalotes (L.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in tropical rain forest
,
1972
.
[5]
Hubert Markl,et al.
Die Verständigung durch Stridulationssignale bei Blattschneiderameisen
,
1968,
Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.
[6]
Edward O. Wilson,et al.
Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta)
,
1980,
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[7]
D. J. Stradling.
THE INFLUENCE OF SIZE ON FORAGING IN THE ANT, ATTA CEPHALOTES, AND THE EFFECT OF SOME PLANT DEFENCE MECHANISMS
,
1978
.
[8]
N. A. Weber.
Gardening ants, the attines
,
1972
.
[9]
F. Roces,et al.
Leaf density and a trade-off between load-size selection and recruitment behavior in the ant Atta cephalotes
,
1994,
Oecologia.
[10]
Huber t Markl.
Recruitment and Food-Retrieving Behavior
,
.
[11]
J. M. Cherrett.
The Foraging Behaviour of Atta cephalotes L. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)
,
1968
.
[12]
A. Lugo,et al.
The Impact of the Leaf Cutter Ant Atta Colombica on the Energy Flow of a Tropical West Forest
,
1973
.
[13]
A. Michelsen,et al.
Biophysics of the ensiferan ear
,
1978,
Journal of Comparative Physiology.
[14]
T. Lewis,et al.
Rhythmic foraging in the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes (L.) (Formicidae: Attini)
,
1974
.
[15]
B. Hölldobler,et al.
Recruitment and food-retrieving behavior in Novomessor (Formicidae, Hymenoptera)
,
1978,
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[16]
Flavio Roces,et al.
Use of a Sound-Based Vibratome by Leaf-Cutting Ants
,
1995,
Science.
[17]
U. Maschwitz,et al.
Foraging strategies and recruitment behaviour in the European harvester ant Messor rufitarsis (F.)
,
1985,
Oecologia.
[18]
Donald H. Feener,et al.
Defense against parasites by hitchhikers in leaf-cutting ants: a quantitative assessment
,
2004,
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[19]
C. Baroni-Urbani,et al.
Substrate vibration during recruitment in ant social organization
,
1988,
Insectes Sociaux.
[20]
P. Howse,et al.
The mass recruitment system of the leaf cutting ant, Atta cephalotes (L.)
,
1979,
Animal Behaviour.
[21]
H. Markl,et al.
Mating behavior and sound production in harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex, Formicidae)
,
1977,
Insectes Sociaux.
[22]
H. Markl.
Stridulation in Leaf-Cutting Ants
,
1965,
Science.
[23]
F. Roces,et al.
Stridulation in leaf-cutting ants
,
1993,
Naturwissenschaften.