Electrostatic properties of protein-protein complexes.

Statistical electrostatic analysis of 37 protein-protein complexes extracted from the previously developed database of protein complexes (ProtCom, http://www.ces.clemson.edu/compbio/protcom) is presented. It is shown that small interfaces have a higher content of charged and polar groups compared to large interfaces. In a vast majority of the cases the average pKa shifts for acidic residues induced by the complex formation are negative, indicating that complex formation stabilizes their ionizable states, whereas the histidines are predicted to destabilize the complex. The individual pKa shifts show the same tendency since 80% of the interfacial acidic groups were found to lower their pKas, whereas only 25% of histidines raise their pKa upon the complex formation. The interfacial groups have been divided into three sets according to the mechanism of their pKa shift, and statistical analysis of each set was performed. It was shown that the optimum pH values (pH of maximal stability) of the complex tend to be the same as the optimum pH values of the complex components. This finding can be used in the homology-based prediction of the 3D structures of protein complexes, especially when one needs to evaluate and rank putative models. It is more likely for a model to be correct if both components of the model complex and the entire complex have the same or at least similar values of the optimum pH.

[1]  A. Elcock,et al.  Computer Simulation of Protein−Protein Interactions , 2001 .

[2]  P. Bork,et al.  Structure-Based Assembly of Protein Complexes in Yeast , 2004, Science.

[3]  Barry Honig,et al.  On the role of electrostatic interactions in the design of protein-protein interfaces. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Maxim Totrov,et al.  Improving CAPRI predictions: Optimized desolvation for rigid‐body docking , 2005, Proteins.

[5]  O. Dym,et al.  The modular architecture of protein-protein binding interfaces. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Optimization of binding electrostatics: Charge complementarity in the barnase‐barstar protein complex , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[7]  K. Scheffzek,et al.  The Rac–RhoGDI complex and the structural basis for the regulation of Rho proteins by RhoGDI , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[8]  C. Tanford Protein denaturation. , 1968, Advances in protein chemistry.

[9]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[10]  Gregory R. Hoffman,et al.  Structures of Cdc42 bound to the active and catalytically compromised forms of Cdc42GAP , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[11]  P. Kollman,et al.  Computational Alanine Scanning To Probe Protein−Protein Interactions: A Novel Approach To Evaluate Binding Free Energies , 1999 .

[12]  S. Jones,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Sujata Sharma,et al.  Structure of the zinc-induced heterodimer of two calcium-free isoforms of phospholipase A2 from Naja naja sagittifera at 2.7 angstroms resolution. , 2005, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[14]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Structure and kinetics of a transient antibody binding intermediate reveal a kinetic discrimination mechanism in antigen recognition. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  C. Pickart,et al.  Molecular Insights into Polyubiquitin Chain Assembly Crystal Structure of the Mms2/Ubc13 Heterodimer , 2001, Cell.

[16]  Hui Lu,et al.  MULTIPROSPECTOR: An algorithm for the prediction of protein–protein interactions by multimeric threading , 2002, Proteins.

[17]  N. Pavletich,et al.  Structure of the p53 Tumor Suppressor Bound to the Ankyrin and SH3 Domains of 53BP2 , 1996, Science.

[18]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Numerical calculations of the pH of maximal protein stability. The effect of the sequence composition and three-dimensional structure. , 2003, European journal of biochemistry.

[19]  K. Hopfner,et al.  Structural Biochemistry of ATP-Driven Dimerization and DNA-Stimulated Activation of SMC ATPases , 2004, Current Biology.

[20]  S. Phillips,et al.  Antibody fragment Fv4155 bound to two closely related steroid hormones: the structural basis of fine specificity. , 1997, Structure.

[21]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Role of the protein side‐chain fluctuations on the strength of pair‐wise electrostatic interactions: Comparing experimental with computed pKas , 2002, Proteins.

[22]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  Small rearrangements in structures of Fv and Fab fragments of antibody D 1.3 on antigen binding , 1990, Nature.

[23]  Z. Jia,et al.  Mechanism of bacterial cell-surface attachment revealed by the structure of cellulosomal type II cohesin-dockerin complex. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Charge optimization of the interface between protein kinases and their ligands , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[25]  A. Brunger,et al.  Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity Crystal Structure of the Small G Protein Rab3A Complexed with the Effector Domain of Rabphilin-3A , 1999, Cell.

[26]  B. Stillman,et al.  Structural basis for origin recognition complex 1 protein-silence information regulator 1 protein interaction in epigenetic silencing. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Optimal docking area: A new method for predicting protein–protein interaction sites , 2004, Proteins.

[28]  M. Perutz,et al.  The crystal structure of human deoxyhaemoglobin at 1.74 A resolution. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces , 2000, Proteins.

[30]  D. Banner,et al.  Crystal structure of the soluble human 55 kd TNF receptor-human TNFβ complex: Implications for TNF receptor activation , 1993, Cell.

[31]  B. Rost,et al.  Predicted protein–protein interaction sites from local sequence information , 2003, FEBS letters.

[32]  Ivan Ovcharenko,et al.  rVISTA 2.0: evolutionary analysis of transcription factor binding sites , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  B Honig,et al.  Electrostatic contributions to protein–protein interactions: Fast energetic filters for docking and their physical basis , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[34]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Rapid Estimation of Solvation Energy for Simulations of Protein-Protein Association. , 2005, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[35]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Binding of aminoglycoside antibiotics to the small ribosomal subunit: a continuum electrostatics investigation. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[36]  N. Shimba,et al.  The pH-dependent structural variation of complementarity-determining region H3 in the crystal structures of the Fv fragment from an anti-dansyl monoclonal antibody. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Statistical analysis and prediction of protein–protein interfaces , 2005, Proteins.

[38]  J A McCammon,et al.  Theory of biomolecular recognition. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[39]  E. Alexov,et al.  Incorporating protein conformational flexibility into the calculation of pH-dependent protein properties. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[40]  M. Perutz,et al.  The structure of horse methaemoglobin at 2-0 A resolution. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Relative contributions of desolvation, inter‐ and intramolecular interactions to binding affinity in protein kinase systems , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[42]  Marc A. Martí-Renom,et al.  MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  A. Fukamizu,et al.  pH-Dependent structural changes at Ca(2+)-binding sites of coagulation factor IX-binding protein. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  S. L. Wong,et al.  Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein–protein interaction network , 2005, Nature.

[45]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Structural modeling of ataxin‐3 reveals distant homology to adaptins , 2002, Proteins.

[46]  Katrin Rittinger,et al.  Structure at 1.65 Å of RhoA and its GTPase-activating protein in complex with a transition-state analogue , 1997, Nature.

[47]  K. Murakami,et al.  Crystal structures of the ADP and ATP bound forms of the Bacillus anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB in complex with the anti-anti-sigma SpoIIAA. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Design of improved protein inhibitors of HIV‐1 cell entry: Optimization of electrostatic interactions at the binding interface , 2005, Proteins.

[49]  Andrej Sali,et al.  Combining electron microscopy and comparative protein structure modeling. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[50]  K. Christopher Garcia,et al.  The Structure of Interleukin-2 Complexed with Its Alpha Receptor , 2005, Science.

[51]  E. Alexov,et al.  Combining conformational flexibility and continuum electrostatics for calculating pK(a)s in proteins. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[52]  B. Chain,et al.  Structural Relationships and Cellular Tropism of Staphylococcal Superantigen-Like Proteins , 2004, Infection and Immunity.

[53]  L. Wyns,et al.  Chemical Basis for the Affinity Maturation of a Camel Single Domain Antibody* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[54]  S. Jones,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  Main chain and side chain dynamics of oxidized flavodoxin from Cyanobacterium anabaena. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[56]  Hui Lu,et al.  Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[57]  J. Thornton,et al.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  Jae Young Lee,et al.  Crystal structure and functional analysis of the SurE protein identify a novel phosphatase family , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[59]  M. Jobling,et al.  Structural Basis for the Activation of Cholera Toxin by Human ARF6-GTP , 2005, Science.

[60]  Young Chul Park,et al.  A Novel Mechanism of TRAF Signaling Revealed by Structural and Functional Analyses of the TRADD–TRAF2 Interaction , 2000, Cell.

[61]  J. Mccammon,et al.  On the evaluation and optimization of protein X‐ray structures for pKa calculations , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[62]  J. Wells,et al.  Mutational analysis and protein engineering of receptor-binding determinants in human placental lactogen. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[63]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[64]  Patrick Aloy,et al.  Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  P. Carter,et al.  X‐ray structures of fragments from binding and nonbinding versions of a humanized anti‐CD18 antibody: Structural indications of the key role of VH residues 59 to 65 , 1994, Proteins.

[66]  K. Murakami,et al.  Crystal Structures of the ADP and ATP Bound Forms of the Bacillus Anti-σ Factor SpoIIAB in Complex with the Anti-anti-σ SpoIIAA , 2004 .

[67]  J. Tainer,et al.  The rad50 signature motif: essential to ATP binding and biological function. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[68]  H. Mizuno,et al.  Crystal structure of flavocetin-A, a platelet glycoprotein Ib-binding protein, reveals a novel cyclic tetramer of C-type lectin-like heterodimers. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[69]  S. Smerdon,et al.  MgF(3)(-) as a transition state analog of phosphoryl transfer. , 2002, Chemistry & biology.

[70]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Barstar is electrostatically optimized for tight binding to barnase , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[71]  Sebastian Maurer-Stroh,et al.  Crystal structure of the p14/MP1 scaffolding complex: how a twin couple attaches mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling to late endosomes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[72]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Calculating pKa values in enzyme active sites , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[73]  B Tidor,et al.  Charge optimization leads to favorable electrostatic binding free energy. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[74]  I. Wilson,et al.  Crystal Structure of a Shark Single-Domain Antibody V Region in Complex with Lysozyme , 2004, Science.

[75]  Sujata Sharma,et al.  Structure of the zinc-saturated C-terminal lobe of bovine lactoferrin at 2.0 A resolution. , 2005, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[76]  N. Ben-Tal,et al.  Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein–protein interfaces , 2001, Proteins.

[77]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Directed in Vitro Evolution and Crystallographic Analysis of a Peptide-binding Single Chain Antibody Fragment (scFv) with Low Picomolar Affinity* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.