Exploring the Sequential Lineup Advantage Using WITNESS

[1]  Curt A. Carlson,et al.  Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[2]  Steven Clark,et al.  Suspect identification diagnosticity in same-foils and different-foils lineup procedures , 2009 .

[3]  S. Clark,et al.  Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[4]  Steven E Clark,et al.  On the Diagnosticity of Multiple-Witness Identifications , 2008, Law and Human Behavior.

[5]  G. Wells.  Theory, Logic and Data : Paths to a More Coherent Eyewitness Science , 2008 .

[6]  S. Clark.  The importance (necessity) of computational modelling for eyewitness identification research , 2008 .

[7]  William H. Batchelder,et al.  Assessing individual differences in categorical data , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  N. Brewer,et al.  Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  Ryan T. Howell,et al.  Regularities in Eyewitness Identification , 2008, Law and human behavior.

[10]  Curt A Carlson,et al.  Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[11]  Christopher F. Silver,et al.  When accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses look the same: a limitation of the ‘pop‐out’ effect and the 10‐ to 12‐second rule , 2007 .

[12]  R. Malpass,et al.  Sequential vs. Simultaneous Lineups: A Review of Methods, Data, and Theory. , 2006 .

[13]  Otto H MacLin,et al.  Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: A dual-process signal detection theory analysis , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[14]  S. Clark,et al.  The Target-to-Foils Shift in Simultaneous and Sequential Lineups , 2005, Law and human behavior.

[15]  Steven E. Clark,et al.  A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification , 2003 .

[16]  S. Stevenage,et al.  Simultaneous and sequential lineups: Decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses. , 2001 .

[17]  Nancy K. Steblay,et al.  Eyewitness Accuracy Rates in Sequential and Simultaneous Lineup Presentations: A Meta-Analytic Comparison , 2001, Law and human behavior.

[18]  S. Clark,et al.  Selecting Lineup Foils in Eyewitness Identification Experiments: Experimental Control and Real-World Simulation , 2001, Law and human behavior.

[19]  R. Malpass,et al.  Eyewitness Identification Procedures: Recommendations for Lineups and Photospreads , 1998 .

[20]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  S. Lewandowsky.  The Rewards and Hazards of Computer Simulations , 1993 .

[23]  J. Parker,et al.  An attempt to reduce guessing behavior in children's and adults' eyewitness identifications , 1993 .

[24]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineups , 1993 .

[25]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Biased lineups: sequential presentation reduces the problem. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Sequential lineup presentation : technique matters , 1991 .

[27]  R. Melara,et al.  Enhancing lineup identification accuracy: two codes are better than one. , 1989, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[29]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. , 1985 .

[30]  G. Wells.  Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. , 1978 .

[31]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[32]  R. Bjork.  Why mathematical models , 1973 .

[33]  William P. Banks,et al.  Signal detection theory and human memory. , 1970 .

[34]  N. Brewer,et al.  A Role for Theory in Eyewitness Identification Research , 2007 .

[35]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Eyewitness : A computerized framework for the administration and practical application of research in eyewitness psychology , 2005 .

[36]  C. Schunn,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit in Comparison of Models to Data , 2005 .

[37]  S. Morgenthaler.  Robustness in Statistics , 2001 .

[38]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Relating Theory and Data : Essays on Human Memory in Honor of Bennet B. Murdock , 1991 .

[39]  D. L. Hintzman.  Why are Formal Models Useful in Psychology , 1990 .

[40]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[41]  G. Box.  Robustness in the Strategy of Scientific Model Building. , 1979 .