Clinical outcome of supervised pulmonary telerehabilitation program among adult patients with post‐acute COVID‐19 symptoms (PACS): A case series

Patients with post‐acute COVID‐19 symptoms (PACS) can present with significant sequela due to the complex systemic effects of COVID‐19 infection. Most affected patients have persistent symptoms for 3–12 months after recovery from the acute phase of COVID‐19. Dyspnea affecting activities of daily living is one of the most challenging symptoms and has led to an influx of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) demand. Here we report the outcome of nine subjects with PACS who underwent 24 sessions of supervised pulmonary telerehabilitation. An improvised telerehabilitation PR was formulated to accommodate home confinement during the pandemic. Exercise capacity and pulmonary function were assessed using a cardiopulmonary exercise test, pulmonary function test, and St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The clinical outcome shows improved exercise capacity on the 6‐minute walk test for all patients, and most had improvement in VO2 peak and SGRQ. Seven patients improved in forced vital capacity and six in forced expiratory volume. PR is a comprehensive intervention for patients with chronic obstructive disease aimed at alleviating pulmonary symptoms and improving functional capacity. In this case series, we report its usefulness in patients with PACS and its feasibility when delivered as a supervised telerehabilitation program. Further support for the effectiveness of PR patients with PACS is mandated.

[1]  C. F. Leochico,et al.  Continuing Care through Telerehabilitation for Patients in a COVID-19 Referral Center in the Philippines: A Case Series , 2022, Acta Medica Philippina.

[2]  Zhishun Liu,et al.  Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2022, Frontiers in Medicine.

[3]  C. F. Leochico,et al.  Challenges to the Emergence of Telerehabilitation in a Developing Country: A Systematic Review , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[4]  Carl Froilan D. Leochico Adoption of telerehabilitation in a developing country before and during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.

[5]  L. Donini,et al.  Obesity or BMI Paradox? Beneath the Tip of the Iceberg , 2020, Frontiers in Nutrition.

[6]  P. Larsen,et al.  Rehabilitation 2030: A Call for Action. , 2019, Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses.

[7]  B. Chandrasekaran,et al.  Telerehabilitation for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: An Underrecognized Management in Tertiary Care , 2018, Indian journal of palliative care.

[8]  Martin Burtscher,et al.  Survival of the fittest: VO2max, a key predictor of longevity? , 2018, Frontiers in bioscience.

[9]  Thierry Troosters,et al.  An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease , 2014, European Respiratory Journal.

[10]  J. Karnon,et al.  A systematic review of economic analyses of telehealth services using real time video communication , 2010, BMC health services research.

[11]  E. Wouters,et al.  Responsiveness and MCID Estimates for CAT, CCQ, and HADS in Patients With COPD Undergoing Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Prospective Analysis. , 2017, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[12]  Sally J. Singh,et al.  American Thoracic Society Documents An Official American Thoracic Society / European Respiratory Society Statement : Key Concepts and Advances in Pulmonary Rehabilitation Executive Summary , 2013 .