A new resilience measure for supply networks with the ripple effect considerations: a Bayesian network approach

This is the first study that presents a supply chain (SC) resilience measure with the ripple effect considerations including both disruption and recovery stages. SCs have become more prone to disruptions due to their complexity and strategic outsourcing. While development of resilient SC designs is desirable and indeed critical to withstand the disruptions, exploiting the resilience capabilities to achieve the target performance outcomes through effective recovery is becoming increasingly important. More adversely, resilience assessment in multi-stage SCs is particularly challenged by consideration of disruption propagation and its associated impact known as the ripple effect. We theorize a new measure to quantify the resilience of the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) with a multi-stage assessment of suppliers’ proneness to disruptions and the SC exposure to the ripple effect. We examine and test the developed notion of SC resilience as a function of supplier vulnerability and recoverability using a Bayesian network and considering disruption propagation using a real-life case-study in car manufacturing. The findings suggest that our model can be of value for OEMs to identify the resilience level of their most important suppliers based on forming a quadrant plot in terms of supplier importance and resilience. Our approach can be used by managers to identify the disruption profiles in the supply base and associated SC performance degradation due to the ripple effect. Our method explicitly allows to uncover latent, high-risk suppliers to develop recommendations to control the ripple effect. Utilizing the outcomes of this research can support the design of resilient supply networks with a large number of suppliers: critical suppliers with low resilience can be identified and developed.

[1]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Perspectives on risk management in supply chains , 2009 .

[2]  Göran Svensson,et al.  A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains , 2000 .

[3]  Elise Miller-Hooks,et al.  Resilience: An Indicator of Recovery Capability in Intermodal Freight Transport , 2012, Transp. Sci..

[4]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  ‘A blessing in disguise’ or ‘as if it wasn’t hard enough already’: reciprocal and aggravate vulnerabilities in the supply chain , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[5]  Logan Perreault,et al.  Factored performance functions and decision making in continuous time Bayesian networks , 2017, J. Appl. Log..

[6]  William Marsh,et al.  From complex questionnaire and interviewing data to intelligent Bayesian Network models for medical decision support , 2016, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[7]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Assessing the risks of service failures based on ripple effects: A Bayesian network approach , 2013 .

[8]  Boris V. Sokolov,et al.  Optimal distribution (re)planning in a centralized multi-stage supply network under conditions of the ripple effect and structure dynamics , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Chad W. Autry,et al.  A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness , 2014 .

[10]  KwangSup Shin,et al.  Evaluation mechanism for structural robustness of supply chain considering disruption propagation , 2016 .

[11]  M. Christopher,et al.  Building the Resilient Supply Chain , 2004 .

[12]  Min Ouyang,et al.  An integrated tri-level model for enhancing the resilience of facilities against intentional attacks , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[13]  Yusoon Kim,et al.  Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective , 2015 .

[14]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Simultaneous structural–operational control of supply chain dynamics and resilience , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[15]  Yossi Sheffi,et al.  The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[16]  D. Ivanov Revealing interfaces of supply chain resilience and sustainability: a simulation study , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[17]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Optimization of network redundancy and contingency planning in sustainable and resilient supply chain resource management under conditions of structural dynamics , 2019, Annals of Operations Research.

[18]  Laura Uusitalo,et al.  Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling , 2007 .

[19]  William Ho,et al.  Models for supplier selection and risk mitigation: a holistic approach , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[20]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Structural quantification of the ripple effect in the supply chain , 2016 .

[21]  Kevin P. Scheibe,et al.  Supply chain disruption propagation: a systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[22]  R. Henry,et al.  Buyer perceptions of supply disruption risk: A behavioral view and empirical assessment , 2010 .

[23]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Bayesian network modelling for supply chain risk propagation , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[24]  Myles D. Garvey,et al.  An analytical framework for supply network risk propagation: A Bayesian network approach , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: a dynamic capability view , 2018, Production Planning & Control.

[26]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  A Supply Risk Reduction Model Using Integrated Multicriteria Decision Making , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[27]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[28]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Antecedents of Resilient Supply Chains: An Empirical Study , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[29]  Kash Barker,et al.  A review of definitions and measures of system resilience , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis , 2019, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[31]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  Supply chain risk and resilience: theory building through structured experiments and simulation , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[32]  S. Talluri,et al.  Disruptions in Supply Networks: A Probabilistic Risk Assessment Approach , 2015 .

[33]  Devanandham Henry,et al.  Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Building resilience and managing post-disruption supply chain recovery: Lessons from the information and communication technology industry , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[35]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Risk Analysis of Subsea Blowout Preventer by Mapping GO Models into Bayesian Networks , 2018, Bayesian Networks for Reliability Engineering.

[36]  Kash Barker,et al.  A Bayesian network model for resilience-based supplier selection , 2016 .

[37]  Ivanov,et al.  Handbook of Ripple Effects in the Supply Chain , 2019, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science.

[38]  N. Carbonara,et al.  How do supply chain risk management flexibility-driven strategies perform in mitigating supply disruption risks? , 2017 .

[39]  Norman E. Fenton,et al.  Improved reliability modeling using Bayesian networks and dynamic discretization , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[40]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Integrated analysis of supply chain structure design and adaptation potential in an agile environment , 2011 .

[41]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Low-Certainty-Need (LCN) supply chains: a new perspective in managing disruption risks and resilience , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[42]  Kash Barker,et al.  Modeling infrastructure resilience using Bayesian networks: A case study of inland waterway ports , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[43]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment: empirical evidence from the Indian auto components industry , 2018 .

[44]  Daniel Traian Pele,et al.  Information Entropy and Measures of Market Risk , 2017, Entropy.

[45]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Understanding industrial safety: Comparing Fault tree, Bayesian network, and FRAM approaches , 2017 .

[46]  Jennifer Blackhurst,et al.  The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[47]  S. Talluri,et al.  Assessing the Efficiency of Risk Mitigation Strategies in Supply Chains , 2013 .

[48]  Boris V. Sokolov,et al.  Control and system-theoretic identification of the supply chain dynamics domain for planning, analysis and adaptation of performance under uncertainty , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[49]  John Yen,et al.  Analyzing the Resilience of Complex Supply Network Topologies Against Random and Targeted Disruptions , 2011, IEEE Systems Journal.

[50]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions , 2015 .

[51]  Enzo Morosini Frazzon,et al.  A supervised machine learning approach to data-driven simulation of resilient supplier selection in digital manufacturing , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[52]  Denise R. Aberle,et al.  Prediction of lung cancer incidence on the low-dose computed tomography arm of the National Lung Screening Trial: A dynamic Bayesian network , 2016, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[53]  Q. Wang Probability distribution and entropy as a measure of uncertainty , 2006, cond-mat/0612076.

[54]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[55]  Pankaj Dutta,et al.  Humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future directions of research , 2018, Annals of Operations Research.

[56]  Seyed Ali Torabi,et al.  Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks , 2015 .

[57]  Eugene Levner,et al.  Entropy-based model for the ripple effect: managing environmental risks in supply chains , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[58]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Big data analytics in operations and supply chain management , 2018, Ann. Oper. Res..

[59]  Finn V. Jensen,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[60]  David Simchi-Levi,et al.  Disruption Risk Mitigation in Supply Chains - The Risk Exposure Index Revisited , 2016, Oper. Res..

[61]  Kevin P. Scheibe,et al.  Supply chain vulnerability assessment: A network based visualization and clustering analysis approach , 2018 .

[62]  Maruf Hossan Chowdhury,et al.  Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory , 2017 .

[63]  Norman Fenton,et al.  Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis with Bayesian Networks , 2012 .

[64]  Luigi Portinale,et al.  Bayesian networks in reliability , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[65]  M. Parast,et al.  An assessment of supply chain disruption mitigation strategies , 2017 .

[66]  Christoph Teller,et al.  Supply chain capabilities, risks, and resilience , 2017 .

[67]  Zhimin Xi,et al.  A Unified Framework for Evaluating Supply Chain Reliability and Resilience , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[68]  Navid Sahebjamnia,et al.  Building organizational resilience in the face of multiple disruptions , 2018 .

[69]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory , 2010 .

[70]  Nezih Altay,et al.  Application of project management to disaster resilience , 2019, Annals of Operations Research.

[71]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  A real-option approach to mitigate disruption risk in the supply chain , 2019, Omega.

[72]  Bernardo Spagnolo,et al.  Nonlinear Relaxation Phenomena in Metastable Condensed Matter Systems , 2016, Entropy.

[73]  Benjamin B. M. Shao,et al.  A data-analytics approach to identifying hidden critical suppliers in supply networks: Development of nexus supplier index , 2018, Decis. Support Syst..

[74]  Ken R. McNaught,et al.  Using Bayesian Networks to forecast spares demand from equipment failures in a changing service logistics context , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[75]  Rameshwar Dubey,et al.  Swift trust and commitment: The missing links for humanitarian supply chain coordination? , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[76]  John Quigley,et al.  Exploring dependency based probabilistic supply chain risk measures for prioritising interdependent risks and strategies , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[77]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Simulation-based ripple effect modelling in the supply chain , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[78]  Christopher S. Tang Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions , 2006 .

[79]  Hossein Baharmand,et al.  Defining and measuring the network flexibility of humanitarian supply chains: insights from the 2015 Nepal earthquake , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[80]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Hybrid Fuzzy-Probabilistic Approach to Supply Chain Resilience Assessment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[81]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Does the ripple effect influence the bullwhip effect? An integrated analysis of structural and operational dynamics in the supply chain† , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[82]  Abdullah Al Khaled,et al.  A general framework for assessing system resilience using Bayesian networks: A case study of sulfuric acid manufacturer , 2016 .

[83]  Víctor Yepes,et al.  Bayesian network method for decision-making about the social sustainability of infrastructure projects , 2018 .

[84]  Y. Sheffi,et al.  A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise , 2005 .

[85]  Harpreet Kaur,et al.  Proactive and reactive models for disaster resilient supply chain , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[86]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  The Ripple effect in supply chains: trade-off ‘efficiency-flexibility-resilience’ in disruption management , 2014 .

[87]  Jie Sun,et al.  Risk analysis of emergent water pollution accidents based on a Bayesian Network. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[88]  Tsan-Ming Choi,et al.  Optimal Bi-Objective Redundancy Allocation for Systems Reliability and Risk Management , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[89]  G. Kovács,et al.  Responding to Disruptions in the Supply Network – From Dormant to Action , 2009 .

[90]  José M. Vidal,et al.  Supply network topology and robustness against disruptions – an investigation using multi-agent model , 2011 .

[91]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study , 2015 .

[92]  Abroon Qazi,et al.  Supply chain risk network management : a Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks , 2018 .

[93]  David Simchi-Levi,et al.  Identifying Risks and Mitigating Disruptions in the Automotive Supply Chain , 2015, Interfaces.

[94]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Dynamic recovery policies for time-critical supply chains under conditions of ripple effect , 2016 .