What We Know About the Saga of Land Degradation and How to Deal with It

The 5th International Conference on Land Degradation held at the Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari, Italy in September 2008 brought together some 100 people from 37 countries worldwide. A number of international organisations, like FAO, IAEA, EC, and CIHEAM were also present. The conference was split into 8 sessions where 83 papers (43 oral) were presented. In total 235 abstracts were received. The main outcome was that the fight against land degradation and desertification could be successful if the right policy instruments are put in place and most importantly when local people are both authors and actors of the development process. Moreover, soil conservation and restoration should be one component of an integrated ecosystem management strategy that should include also water, biodiversity, livelihoods and human impacts on ecosystems. There are numerous positive results when dealing with land degradation worldwide. They should be used to emphasise the urgent needs for further actions to accelerate and scale up progress and not to induce complacency. Improved land resources management measures should build on scientific evidence, local innovation and knowledge and be locally tested and validated before being applied at larger scale. Natural resource base conservation should continue to be a priority for national governments and international organisations but Africa requires particular attention. The recent financial, economic and food global crisis should not overshadow the urgent needs to deal with natural resource management and conservation and mitigate climate change impacts.

[1]  M. Stocking,et al.  Tropical Soils and Food Security: The Next 50 Years , 2003, Science.

[2]  Ward Chesworth,et al.  Encyclopedia of soil science. , 2008 .

[3]  D. Dent,et al.  How good is GLASOD? , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  K. Wiebe Land quality, agricultural productivity, and food security: biophysical processes and economic choices at local, regional, and global levels. , 2003 .

[5]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Proxy global assessment of land degradation , 2008 .

[6]  Michael L. Roderick,et al.  The use of time-integrated NOAA NDVI data and rainfall to assess landscape degradation in the arid shrubland of Western Australia , 2003 .

[7]  Mannava V. K. Sivakumar,et al.  Climate and Land Degradation , 2007 .

[8]  Hanspeter Liniger,et al.  Where the land is greener : case studies and analysis of soil and water conservation initiatives worldwide , 2007 .

[9]  T. Downing,et al.  Global Desertification: Building a Science for Dryland Development , 2007, Science.

[10]  H. Eswaran,et al.  Soil Quality and Soil Productivity in Africa , 1997 .

[11]  H. Eswaran,et al.  An Assessment of Land Resource Consumption in Relation to Land Degradation in Turkey , 2000 .

[12]  N. Lamaddalena,et al.  The EU-Funded Medcoastland Thematic Network and its Findings in Combating Land Degradation in the Mediterranean Region , 2007 .

[13]  A. J. Thomasson World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation: L.R. Oldeman, R.T.A. Hakkeling and W.G. Sombroek, Published by the International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC) and funded by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 1990. Price US$25.- (unfolded US$20.-) , 1992 .

[14]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Environmental and Economic Costs of Soil Erosion and Conservation Benefits , 1995, Science.

[15]  R. Thomas 10th anniversary review: addressing land degradation and climate change in dryland agroecosystems through sustainable land management. , 2008, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[16]  Jocelyn Kaiser,et al.  Wounding Earth's Fragile Skin , 2004, Science.

[17]  C. Tucker,et al.  Desertification in the Sahel: a reinterpretation of a reinterpretation , 2007 .

[18]  U. Safriel,et al.  The Assessment of Global Trends in Land Degradation , 2007 .