Optimization of Perturbative PV MPPT Methods Through Online System Identification

The maximum power point (MPP) tracking function allows one to extract the maximum power from the photovoltaic (PV) system in any operating condition. The perturb and observe technique is one of the mainly used algorithms aimed at this function. Its performances depend on the values of the two design parameters, which are the amplitude and the frequency of the perturbations that it applies in identifying the position of the MPP. In this paper, a method for the online optimization of the perturbation period is presented. It is based on the identification of the whole system, including the PV source and the dc/dc converter controlling it. The system impulse and frequency responses are evaluated by using the cross-correlation method. Such a technique, as well as the tracking algorithm, is effectively implemented by using a field-programmable gate array, and it is validated by means of simulation and experimental results.

[1]  Robert W. Erickson,et al.  Fundamentals of Power Electronics , 2001 .

[2]  Fang Lin Luo,et al.  Small Signal Analysis of Energy Factor and Mathematical Modeling for Power DC–DC Converters , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[3]  D. Maksimovic,et al.  An Autotuning Digital Controller for DC–DC Power Converters Based on Online Frequency-Response Measurement , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[4]  Luigi Piegari,et al.  Adaptive perturb and observe algorithm for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking , 2010 .

[5]  Eric Monmasson,et al.  FPGAs in Industrial Control Applications , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[6]  Saad Mekhilef,et al.  Simulation and Hardware Implementation of Incremental Conductance MPPT With Direct Control Method Using Cuk Converter , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[7]  Jean-Paul Gaubert,et al.  An Improved Maximum Power Point Tracking for Photovoltaic Grid-Connected Inverter Based on Voltage-Oriented Control , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[8]  Marko Topič,et al.  Comparison of direct maximum power point tracking algorithms using EN 50530 dynamic test procedure , 2011 .

[9]  Josep M. Guerrero,et al.  A Novel Improved Variable Step-Size Incremental-Resistance MPPT Method for PV Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  M. Vitelli,et al.  Power Electronics and Control Techniques for Maximum Energy Harvesting in Photovoltaic Systems , 2012 .

[11]  Rached Dhaouadi,et al.  Efficiency Optimization of a DSP-Based Standalone PV System Using Fuzzy Logic and Dual-MPPT Control , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[12]  Eric Monmasson,et al.  On-line optimization of the P&O MPPT method by means of the system identification , 2013, IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[13]  Enrique Romero-Cadaval,et al.  Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Generation Plants: Components and Operation , 2013, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[14]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Adaptive Hybrid Maximum Power Point Tracking Method for a Photovoltaic System , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[15]  S. Bacha,et al.  Adaptive MPPT Applied to Variable-Speed Microhydropower Plant , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[16]  Barry W. Williams,et al.  Wind Turbine Power Coefficient Analysis of a New Maximum Power Point Tracking Technique , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[17]  Antonios G. Kladas,et al.  Fast Photovoltaic-System Voltage- or Current-Oriented MPPT Employing a Predictive Digital Current-Controlled Converter , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[18]  Yuncong Jiang,et al.  Adaptive Step Size With Adaptive-Perturbation-Frequency Digital MPPT Controller for a Single-Sensor Photovoltaic Solar System , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.