Three-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion using the Zero-profile implant system

Owing to the complications and limitations associated with anterior plating, a new zero-profile, standalone device (Zero-P, Synthes GmbH, Switzerland) for ACDF has been designed in an attempt to overcome the adverse effects associated with traditional cervical anterior plating. Even the excellent outcomes showed in single or two-level ACDF, however, the safety and efficacy of the Zero-P implant applied in three-level ACDF has been little explored. Results from previous biomechanical studies showed that segmental stability decreases with the number of instrumented segments regardless of the used implant but the locking plate and cage construct was stiffer in all test modes than the Zero-P devices in multilevel constructs. However, whether this difference will affect the clinical outcomes still remains unclear. By presenting the clinical and radiographic outcomes of six cases with a short follow-up of 24 months, we are hoping to clarify the safety and effectiveness of three-level ACDF with the zero-profile implant system. The overall results of our study were good. Postoperative complications such as hoarseness, dysphagia, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, malposition of the prosthesis and screw loosening or pull-out were not observed. The patients’ clinical symptoms were relieved 6 months after surgery. All the patients reached bony fusion at the sixth month follow-up according to the standard definition. The preliminary clinical and radiographic outcomes from this case series study demonstrated that the Zero-P implant system may be a safe and efficacious device in ACDF surgery. However, as this is just a case series study, larger randomized controlled studies of longer duration are warranted.

[1]  Wei-jun Liu,et al.  Comparison of zero-profile anchored spacer versus plate-cage construct in treatment of cervical spondylosis with regard to clinical outcomes and incidence of major complications: a meta-analysis , 2015, Therapeutics and clinical risk management.

[2]  E. Benzel,et al.  Pseudoarthrosis rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[3]  Haopeng Li,et al.  Meta-Analysis Comparing Zero-Profile Spacer and Anterior Plate in Anterior Cervical Fusion , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  S. Pabst,et al.  A Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer in Multilevel Cervical Anterior Interbody Fusion: Biomechanical Comparison to Established Fixation Techniques , 2015, Spine.

[5]  F. Certo,et al.  Zero-P: a new zero-profile cage-plate device for single and multilevel ACDF. A single Institution series with four years maximum follow-up and review of the literature on zero-profile devices , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[6]  F. Geisler,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Investigation Comparing PCM Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: 2-Year Results From the US FDA IDE Clinical Trial , 2013, Spine.

[7]  W. Yuan,et al.  The use of a zero-profile device compared with an anterior plate and cage in the treatment of patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis: A preliminary clinical investigation. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[8]  O. Bradáč,et al.  [Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with a zero-p spacer: radiographic results with a minimum follow-up of one year in a prospective study]. , 2011, Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca.

[9]  K. Song,et al.  The Efficacy of Plate Construct Augmentation Versus Cage Alone in Anterior Cervical Fusion , 2009, Spine.

[10]  M. Fernández-Fairen,et al.  Anterior Cervical Fusion With Tantalum Implant: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study , 2008, Spine.

[11]  S. Howng,et al.  Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[12]  Jan Goffin,et al.  Long-Term Follow-Up After Interbody Fusion of the Cervical Spine , 2004, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[13]  B. Sandén,et al.  The significance of radiolucent zones surrounding pedicle screws. Definition of screw loosening in spinal instrumentation. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  B. Subach,et al.  Anterior Cervical Plating Enhances Arthrodesis after Discectomy and Fusion with Cortical Allograft , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[15]  Huilin Yang,et al.  The application of zero-profile anchored spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[16]  W. Azab,et al.  Outcome evaluation of a zero-profile implant for anterior cervical diskectomy with fusion. , 2012, Turkish neurosurgery.

[17]  J L Fox,et al.  Anterior cervical decompression and fusion for cervical spondylosis. , 1968, The Medical annals of the District of Columbia.