Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers' STEM engagement, learning, and teaching

We report a research project with a purpose of helping teachers learn how to design and implement science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) lessons using robotics. Specifically, pre-service teachers' STEM engagement, learning, and teaching via robotics were investigated in an elementary teacher preparation course. Data were collected from surveys, classroom observations, interviews, and lesson plans. Both quantitative and qualitative data analyses indicated that pre-service teachers engaged in robotics activities actively and mindfully. Their STEM engagement improved overall. Their emotional engagement (e.g., interest, enjoyment) in STEM significantly improved and in turn influenced their behavioral and cognitive engagement in STEM. Their lesson designs showed their STEM teaching was developing in productive directions although further work was needed. These findings suggest that robotics can be used as a technology in activities designed to enhance teachers' STEM engagement and teaching through improved attitudes toward STEM. Future research and teacher education recommendations are also presented. The preparation of elementary teachers to teach STEM via robotics was studied.Integrative STEM education was highlighted.The lens of engagement theory was used to examine teacher learning and performance.Productive struggles while learning to program were showcased.The potential of robotics to enhance teachers' STEM engagement and teaching is discussed.

[1]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective , 1998 .

[2]  J. Matjasko,et al.  Engagement Across Developmental Periods , 2012 .

[3]  Wendy McColskey,et al.  The Measurement of Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-report Instruments , 2012 .

[4]  Brant G. Miller,et al.  Supporting Elementary Pre-Service Teachers to Teach STEM Through Place-Based Teaching and Learning Experiences , 2014 .

[5]  Nancy Frey,et al.  Background Knowledge: The Missing Piece of the Comprehension Puzzle , 2009 .

[6]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Teaching Partnerships: Early Childhood and Engineering Students Teaching Math and Science Through Robotics , 2005 .

[7]  S. Christenson,et al.  Jingle, Jangle, 1 and Conceptual Haziness 2 : Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct , 2012 .

[8]  Bradley Barker,et al.  Examining fidelity of program implementation in a STEM-oriented out-of-school setting , 2014 .

[9]  Bradley S. Barker,et al.  Impact of Robotics and Geospatial Technology Interventions on Youth STEM Learning and Attitudes , 2010 .

[10]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Materials for Enabling Hands-On Robotics and STEM Education , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Semantic Scientific Knowledge Integration.

[11]  E. Deci,et al.  The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective , 2000 .

[12]  Michele Moro,et al.  A PBL approach using virtual and real robots (with BYOB and LEGO NXT) to teaching learning key competences and standard curricula in primary level , 2013, TEEM '13.

[13]  Adam V. Maltese,et al.  Eyeballs in the Fridge: Sources of early interest in science , 2010 .

[14]  Elizabeth Sklar,et al.  Using educational robotics to engage inner-city students with technology , 2004 .

[15]  D. Kagan.  Professional Growth Among Preservice and Beginning Teachers , 1992 .

[16]  Subhabrata Chakraborti,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Inference , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[17]  Jeannine E. Turner,et al.  Expectancy-Value Relationships of Shame Reactions and Shame Resiliency. , 2001 .

[18]  Andrzej Ordys,et al.  Technology-centred Teaching Methods to Introduce Programming and Robotic Concepts , 2013 .

[19]  Olga Kosheleva,et al.  Mathematical knowledge and practices resulting from access to digital technologies , 2009 .

[20]  Tandra Tyler-Wood,et al.  Instruments for Assessing Interest in STEM Content and Careers , 2010 .

[21]  Rebecca Brook Osborne,et al.  Teaching with robots: a service-learning approach to mentor training , 2010, SIGCSE.

[22]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[23]  Blaine A. Price,et al.  Using Robotics to Motivate ‘Back Door’ Learning , 2004, Education and Information Technologies.

[24]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  ‘Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’: primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations 1 , 2013 .

[25]  D. Brian Larkins,et al.  Application of the cognitive apprenticeship framework to a middle school robotics camp , 2013, SIGCSE '13.

[26]  Belén Curto,et al.  Resources and features of robotics learning environments (RLEs) in Spain and Latin America , 2013, TEEM '13.

[27]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[28]  Adem Karahoca,et al.  Robotics teaching in primary school education by project based learning for supporting science and technology courses , 2011, WCIT.

[29]  Tom McKlin,et al.  Sneaking in through the back door: introducing k-12 teachers to robot programming , 2014, SIGCSE.

[30]  Xiaoyu Qian,et al.  The Science Semester: Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry for Prospective Elementary Teachers , 2013 .

[31]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Analyzing Qualitative Data , 2014 .

[32]  Elizabeth R. Kazakoff,et al.  The Effect of a Classroom-Based Intensive Robotics and Programming Workshop on Sequencing Ability in Early Childhood , 2013 .

[33]  Maureen A. Conard,et al.  Interest level improves learning but does not moderate the effects of interruptions: An experiment using simultaneous multitasking , 2014 .

[34]  Erkki Sutinen,et al.  Pedagogical Agents for Teacher Intervention in Educational Robotics Classes: Implementation Issues , 2007, 2007 First IEEE International Workshop on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (DIGITEL'07).

[35]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  Folk theories of “inquiry:” How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method , 2004 .

[36]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[37]  Shihkuan Hsu.  Using case discussion on the web to develop student teacher problem solving skills , 2004 .

[38]  R. Pekrun,et al.  Emotions and Motivation in Learning and Performance , 2014 .

[39]  Louis S. Nadelson,et al.  Perceptions, Engagement, and Practices of Teachers Seeking Professional Development in Place-Based Integrated STEM. , 2013 .

[40]  Sergei Abramovich,et al.  Collateral learning and mathematical education of teachers , 2012 .

[41]  Tony P. Murphy,et al.  Graduating STEM Competent and Confident Teachers: The Creation of a STEM Certificate for Elementary Education Majors. , 2012 .

[42]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[43]  Ian T. Cameron,et al.  Development and deployment of a library of industrially focused advanced immersive VR learning environments , 2008 .

[44]  Berit Eika,et al.  Effects of modelling examples in complex procedural skills training: a randomised study , 2013, Medical education.

[45]  J. Finn,et al.  Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? , 2012 .

[46]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[47]  Yu. Pogoreltsev,et al.  The Application , 2020, How to Succeed in the Academic Clinical Interview.

[48]  J. Gross.  Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[49]  Alessandro Araujo,et al.  Methodology for Qualification of Future Teachers in Physics' Degree Course Using Low Cost Robotics , 2013, 2013 Latin American Robotics Symposium and Competition.

[50]  Yuxin Ma,et al.  Acquisition of Physics Content Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry Skills in a Robotics Summer Camp , 2007 .

[51]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) as a Bridge Between Engineering Education Research and Mathematics Education Research , 2008 .

[52]  J. Dewey.  How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[53]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Analyzing Qualitative Data , 2017, ISS.

[54]  E. Deci,et al.  Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: a test of self-determination theory. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  M. Bers.  The TangibleK Robotics Program: Applied Computational Thinking for Young Children. , 2010 .

[56]  Monica McGill,et al.  Learning to Program with Personal Robots: Influences on Student Motivation , 2012, TOCE.

[57]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Toward an Instructionally Oriented Theory of Example-Based Learning , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[58]  Daniel Tocháček,et al.  The Project of Integration the Educational Robotics into the Training Programme of Future ICT Teachers , 2012 .

[59]  Steve V. Coxon,et al.  The Malleability of Spatial Ability Under Treatment of a FIRST LEGO League-Based Robotics Simulation , 2012 .

[60]  Viacheslav I. Adamchuk,et al.  Robots, GPS/GIS, and programming technologies: The power of "digital manipulatives" in youth Extension experiences , 2010 .

[61]  Ellen McIntyre,et al.  Where Is the "E" in STEM for Young Children? Engineering Design Education in an Elementary Teacher Preparation Program. , 2014 .

[62]  Georgios D. Sideridis,et al.  Vitality and Interest-Enjoyment as a Function of Class-to-Class Variation in Need-Supportive Teaching and Pupils' Autonomous Motivation. , 2011 .

[63]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[64]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[65]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Collaborative robotic instruction: A graph teaching experience , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[66]  Margus Pedaste,et al.  LEARNING APPROACHES TO APPLYING ROBOTICS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION , 2013, Journal of Baltic Science Education.

[67]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Designing Technology Activities that Teach Mathematics , 2010 .

[68]  Angie Marie Bucher.  A Survey of Instruments to Assess Teacher Content Knowledge in Science , 2009 .

[69]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[70]  M. Bers.  Blocks to Robots: Learning with Technology in the Early Childhood Classroom , 2008 .

[71]  Brian R. Belland,et al.  Using the theory of habitus to move beyond the study of barriers to technology integration , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[72]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[73]  M. Moro,et al.  Robotics & Constructivism in Education : the TERECoP project , 2007 .

[74]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Exploring Children's Data Modeling , 1996 .

[75]  Jörgen Lindh,et al.  Does lego training stimulate pupils' ability to solve logical problems? , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[76]  S. Blanchard,et al.  Strategies used by elementary schoolchildren solving robotics-based complex tasks: innovative potential of technology , 2010 .

[77]  Steve V. Coxon,et al.  The Malleability of Spatial Ability under Treatment of a FIRST LEGO League-Based Robotics Unit. , 2012 .

[78]  C. Cunningham.  Engineering is Elementary , 2017, 2017 EDI Proceedings.

[79]  湯淺 太一,et al.  20世紀の名著名論:Seymour Papert: Mindstorms:Children Computers and Powerful Ideas Basic Books New York 1980 , 2005 .

[80]  Kurt Becker,et al.  Integrative Approaches among Science,Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects on Students' Learning: AMeta-Analysis , 2009 .

[81]  D. Watson,et al.  Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development , 1995 .

[82]  Md. Mokter Hossain,et al.  How to Motivate US Students to Pursue STEM （Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics） Careers , 2012 .

[83]  Florence R. Sullivan,et al.  Robotics and Discovery Learning: Pedagogical Beliefs, Teacher Practice, and Technology Integration , 2009 .

[84]  Dimitris Alimisis,et al.  Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges , 2013 .

[85]  Bradley Barker,et al.  Examining 4-H Robotics and Geospatial Technologies in the Learning of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Topics , 2008 .

[86]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  Using autonomous robotics to teach science and engineering , 1999, Commun. ACM.

[87]  Marilyn P. Carlson,et al.  Students' Images of Problem Contexts when Solving Applied Problems. , 2012 .

[88]  Chanmin Kim,et al.  Design and implementation of volitional control support in mathematics courses , 2013 .

[89]  Carol A. Carrier,et al.  The Effects of Facilitative and Debilitative Achievement Anxiety on Notetaking , 1984 .

[90]  Chia-Jung Lee,et al.  An implementation study of a TPACK-based instructional design model in a technology integration course , 2014, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[91]  S. Helme,et al.  Identifying cognitive engagement in the mathematics classroom , 2001 .

[92]  Jose Maria Cortina.  What is coefficient alpha , 1993 .

[93]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[94]  T. Kindermann,et al.  A Motivational Perspective on Engagement and Disaffection , 2009 .

[95]  Louis S. Nadelson,et al.  Teacher STEM Perception and Preparation: Inquiry-Based STEM Professional Development for Elementary Teachers , 2013 .

[96]  Andrew J. Martin.  Part II Commentary: Motivation and Engagement: Conceptual, Operational, and Empirical Clarity , 2012 .