R&D collaborations: Is diversity enhancing innovation performance?

The diversity of external knowledge sourced via collaboration is associated to search, monitoring, coordination and transaction costs, but also to the firms’ resources invested in internal innovation efforts. These costs and investments are of major importance especially for firms of small size, financially constrained, with low absorptive capacity and technological capabilities which, in addition, operate in economies of low innovation dynamism. Considering an endogenous relationship of the internal innovation efforts and the diversity of external knowledge sources, allowing for feedback loops, we develop a theoretical framework which allows direct and indirect effects on innovation performance to be identified and estimated. The model is estimated employing a unique dataset of 300 Greek R&D active manufacturing firms drawn from a nationwide survey conducted in 2010. Empirical findings confirm the expected feedback loop relationship and also show that internal innovation efforts positively influence firm...

[1]  Stijn Viaene,et al.  Linking technology intelligence to open innovation , 2010 .

[2]  A. Salter,et al.  The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration , 2014 .

[3]  Hanna Hottenrott,et al.  R&D Partnerships and Innovation Performance: Can There Be Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2014 .

[4]  Lionel Nesta,et al.  The moderating role of the complementary nature of technological resources in the diversification–performance relationship , 2014 .

[5]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[6]  J. Rochet,et al.  Two-sided markets: a progress report , 2006 .

[7]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[8]  Boris Durisin,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization , 2007 .

[9]  G. Dosi,et al.  The Evolution of Technologies: An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art , 2013, Eurasian Business Review.

[10]  Evan Rawley,et al.  Diversification, Coordination Costs and Organizational Rigidity: Evidence from Microdata , 2010 .

[11]  David J. Collis,et al.  Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? , 1994 .

[12]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[13]  Shantanu Dutta,et al.  Benefiting From Alliance Portfolio Diversity , 2014 .

[14]  L. Bengtsson,et al.  Match and manage: the use of knowledge matching and project management to integrate knowledge in collaborative inbound open innovation , 2016 .

[15]  P. Aghion,et al.  Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth , 2002 .

[16]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[17]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[18]  P. Kale.  Managing strategic alliances: what do we know now, and where do we go from here? , 2010 .

[19]  Naqeeb ur Rehman,et al.  Network alliances and firms’ performance: a panel data analysis of Pakistani SMEs , 2016 .

[20]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[21]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[22]  J. D. Jong,et al.  Remote collaboration and innovative performance: the moderating role of R&D intensity , 2016 .

[23]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[24]  J. Marshall.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[25]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[26]  A. D. Malva,et al.  Intellectual property rights, distance to the frontier, and R&D: evidence from microdata , 2016 .

[27]  Bing-Sheng Teng,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2000 .

[28]  Carmen Weigelt,et al.  The impact of outsourcing new technologies on integrative capabilities and performance , 2009 .

[29]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[30]  R. Veugelers,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY MAKE AND BUY IN INNOVATION STRATEGIES : EVIDENCE FROM BELGIAN MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 1998 .

[31]  Tjg Thijs Peeters,et al.  Strategies for Knowledge Use in R&D and Their Implications for Innovative Performance , 2017 .

[32]  E. Carayannis,et al.  Is technological learning a firm core competence, when, how and why? A longitudinal, multi-industry study of firm technological learning and market performance , 2002 .

[33]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Technology Alliance Portfolios and Financial Performance: Value-Enhancing and Cost-Increasing Effects of Open Innovation* , 2010 .

[34]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[35]  Sanjay Mishra,et al.  Factors affecting new product success: Cross-country comparisons☆ , 1996 .

[36]  U. Wassmer,et al.  Alliance Portfolios: A Review and Research Agenda , 2010 .

[37]  Mark Armstrong,et al.  Competition in two-sided markets (2002 version) , 2002 .

[38]  Francisco Lima,et al.  Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners , 2010 .

[39]  Boris Lokshin,et al.  The Productivity Effects of Internal and External R&D: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Data Model , 2008 .

[40]  Chinho Lin,et al.  The alliance innovation performance of R&D alliances—the absorptive capacity perspective , 2012 .

[41]  Alberto López,et al.  Understanding co-operative innovative activity: evidence from four European countries , 2009 .

[42]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[43]  Helfried Moosbrugger,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method , 2000 .

[44]  Arie Y. Lewin,et al.  Microfoundations of Internal and External Absorptive Capacity Routines , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[46]  A. Salter,et al.  Toward an aspiration-level theory of open innovation , 2016 .

[47]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[48]  Marcus Wagner,et al.  The effect of alliances on innovation patterns: an analysis of the biotechnology industry , 2013 .

[49]  R. Handfield,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in Interorganizational Product Development Teams: The Effect of Formal and Informal Socialization Mechanisms* , 2009 .

[50]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[51]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[52]  M. Vivarelli,et al.  Succeeding in innovation: key insights on the role of R&D and technological acquisition drawn from company data , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[53]  Ulrich Kaiser,et al.  Balancing Internal and External Knowledge Acquisition: The Gains and Pains from R&D Outsourcing , 2010 .

[54]  Ammon Salter,et al.  The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms , 2004 .

[55]  K. Tsekouras,et al.  Productive performance based on R&D activities of low-tech firms: an antecedent of the decision to export? , 2015 .

[56]  Ning Wang,et al.  Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies? , 2012 .

[57]  Steven White,et al.  Distinguishing costs of cooperation and control in alliances , 2005 .

[58]  Robert W. Rycroft,et al.  Does cooperation absorb complexity? Innovation networks and the speed and spread of complex technological innovation , 2007 .

[59]  K. Yuan,et al.  5. Three Likelihood-Based Methods for Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis with Nonnormal Missing Data , 2000 .

[60]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[61]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[62]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  Vangelis Souitaris,et al.  Firm-Specific Competencies Determining Technological Innovation: A Survey in Greece , 2002 .