a-tDCS Differential Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: The Effects of Electrode Size

BACKGROUND Novel noninvasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been developed in recent years. tDCS-induced corticospinal excitability changes depend on two important factors: current density and electrodes size. Despite clinical success with existing tDCS parameters; optimal protocols are still not entirely set. OBJECTIVE The current study aimed to investigate the effects of anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) with three electrode sizes on corticospinal excitability. METHODS a-tDCS was applied with three active electrode sizes of 12, 24 and 35 cm(2) with a constant current density of 0.029 mA/cm(2) on twelve right handed healthy individuals (mean age: 34.5 ± 10.32 years) in different sessions at least 48 h apart. a-tDCS was applied continuously for 10 min, with a constant reference electrode size of 35 cm(2). The corticospinal excitability of extensor carpi radialis muscle (ECR) was measured before and immediately after the intervention and at 10, 20 and 30 min thereafter. RESULTS We found that smaller electrode may produce more focal current density and could lead to more effective and localized neural modulation than the larger ones. Post hoc comparisons showed that active electrode of 12 cm(2) size induces the biggest increase in the corticospinal excitability compared to bigger electrode sizes, 24 cm(2) (P = 0.002) and 35 cm(2) (P = 0.000). There was no significant difference between two larger electrode sizes (24 cm(2) and 35 cm(2)) (P = 0.177). a-tDCS resulted in significant excitability enhancement lasting for 30 min after the end of stimulation in the 12 and 24 cm(2) electrode size conditions (P < 0.005). However, in 35 cm(2) electrode size condition, the MEP amplitudes of the ECR did not differ significantly from baseline value in 20 and 30 min post stimulation (P > 0.005). CONCLUSION Reducing stimulation electrode size to one third of the conventional one results in spatially more focused stimulation and increases the efficacy of a-tDCS for induction of larger corticospinal excitability. This may be due to the fact that larger electrodes stimulate nearby cortical functional areas which can have inhibitory effects on primary motor cortex.

[1]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[2]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Treatment of major depression with transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2006, Bipolar disorders.

[3]  Shapour Jaberzadeh,et al.  A Higher Number of TMS-Elicited MEP from a Combined Hotspot Improves Intra- and Inter-Session Reliability of the Upper Limb Muscles in Healthy Individuals , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  F. P. Kendall,et al.  Muscles: Testing and Function, with Posture and Pain , 1993 .

[5]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[8]  G. Aston-Jones,et al.  Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , 2010, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[9]  E. Wassermann,et al.  A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Modulation of moving phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation of V1 in human , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Katsuya Ogata,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor association cortex induces plastic changes in ipsilateral primary motor and somatosensory cortices , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Facilitation of probabilistic classification learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the human , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  K L Gilmore,et al.  Using surface electromyography in physiotherapy research. , 1983, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[15]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Bio-heat transfer model of transcranial DC stimulation: Comparison of conventional pad versus ring electrode , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Comparing Cortical Plasticity Induced by Conventional and High-Definition 4 × 1 Ring tDCS: A Neurophysiological Study , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[17]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Anticonvulsant Effects of Transcranial Direct‐current Stimulation (tDCS) in the Rat Cortical Ramp Model of Focal Epilepsy , 2006, Epilepsia.

[21]  M. Hallett.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool for clinical neurophysiology , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[22]  Jack W. Tsao,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Transcranial Stimulation, E.M. Wassermann (Ed.). Oxford University Press (2008), 747, ISBN 13: 978-0-19-856892-6, $115.00 , 2009 .

[23]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[24]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri – precise head model of transcranial DC stimulation : Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2010 .

[25]  M. A. Nitsche,et al.  Modulation kortikaler Erregbarkeit beim Menschen durch transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation , 2002, Der Nervenarzt.

[26]  M. Hallett,et al.  A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[27]  M G Marciani,et al.  Nervous propagation along 'central' motor pathways in intact man: characteristics of motor responses to 'bifocal' and 'unifocal' spine and scalp non-invasive stimulation. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  A. Antal,et al.  Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[29]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  Premotor transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects primary motor excitability in humans , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[30]  M. Ridding,et al.  Increased cortical excitability induced by transcranial DC and peripheral nerve stimulation , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[31]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Go-no-go task performance improvement after anodal transcranial DC stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression. , 2007, Journal of affective disorders.

[32]  Mark S. Schwartz,et al.  Biofeedback: A Practitioner's Guide , 1987 .

[33]  E. Delagi,et al.  Anatomical guide for the electromyographer : the limbs and trunk /by Edward F. Delagi [et al.] ; illustrated by Phyllis B. Hammond, Aldo O. Perotto, and Hugh Thomas , 2005 .

[34]  D. A. Driscoll,et al.  Current Distribution in the Brain From Surface Electrodes , 1968, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[35]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  A Controlled Clinical Trial of Cathodal DC Polarization in Patients with Refractory Epilepsy , 2006, Epilepsia.

[36]  Alberto Leal,et al.  Comparing different electrode configurations using the 10-10 international system in tDCS: A finite element model analysis , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[37]  Christian Ethier,et al.  The comparable size and overlapping nature of upper limb distal and proximal muscle representations in the human motor cortex , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[38]  N. Thakor,et al.  Determination of current density distributions generated by electrical stimulation of the human cerebral cortex. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[39]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neuroreport.

[40]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[41]  R. Buschbacher.  Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk , 2007 .

[42]  M. Nitsche,et al.  [Modulation of cortical excitability by transcranial direct current stimulation]. , 2002, Der Nervenarzt.

[43]  Glenn Gamst,et al.  Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation , 2005 .

[44]  V. Robertson,et al.  Electrotherapy Explained: Principles and Practice , 1990 .

[45]  M. Bikson,et al.  Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[46]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[47]  Shin J. Oh.  Clinical Electromyography: Nerve Conduction Studies , 1984 .

[48]  D. Purpura,et al.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  Won Hee Lee,et al.  Reduced spatial focality of electrical field in tDCS with ring electrodes due to tissue anisotropy , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[50]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[52]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson's disease , 2006, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.