Analysis of bacterial migration: I. Numerical solution of balance equation

Chemotaxis describes the ability of motile bacteria to bias their motion in the direction of increasing gradients of chemicals, usually energy sources, known as attractants. In experimental studies of the migration of chemotactic bacteria, 1-D phenomenological cell balance equations (Rivero et al., 1989) have been used to quantitatively analyze experimental observations (Ford et al., 1991; Ford and Lauffenburger, 1991). While attractive for their simplicity and the ease of solution, they are limited in the strict mathematical sense to the situation in which individual bacteria are confined to motion in one dimension and respond to attractant gradients in one dimension only. Recently, Ford and Cummings (1992) reduced the general 3-D cell balance equation of Alt (1980) to obtain an equation describing the migration of a bacterial population in response to a 1-D attractant gradient. Solutions of this equation for single gradients of attractants are compared to those of 1-D balance equations, results from cellular dynamics simulations (Frymier et al., 1993), and experimental data from our laboratory for E. coli responding to α-methylaspartate. We also investigate two aspects of the experimentally derived expression for the tumbling probability: the effect of different models for the down-gradient swimming behavior of the bacteria and the validity of ignoring the temporal derivative of the attractant concentration.

[1]  W. Alt Biased random walk models for chemotaxis and related diffusion approximations , 1980, Journal of mathematical biology.

[2]  R. M. Ford,et al.  CELLULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS OF BACTERIAL CHEMOTAXIS , 1993 .

[3]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by Three-dimensional Tracking , 1972, Nature.

[4]  R. M. Ford,et al.  Measurement of bacterial random motility and chemotaxis coefficients: I. Stopped‐flow diffusion chamber assay , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  J. A. Quinn,et al.  Diffusion-induced banding of colloid particles via diffusiophoresis , 1989 .

[6]  J. Susan Milton,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Principles and Applications for Engineering and the Computing Sciences , 1990 .

[7]  Douglas A. Lauffenburger,et al.  Transport models for chemotactic cell populations based on individual cell behavior , 1989 .

[8]  R. M. Ford,et al.  Measurement of bacterial random motility and chemotaxis coefficients: II. Application of single‐cell‐based mathematical model , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[9]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  Statistical measures of bacterial motility and chemotaxis. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  D. Brown,et al.  Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  H. Berg Random Walks in Biology , 2018 .

[12]  Peter T. Cummings,et al.  On the relationship between cell balance equations for chemotactic cell populations , 1992 .

[13]  Lee A. Segel,et al.  A Theoretical Study of Receptor Mechanisms in Bacterial Chemotaxis , 1977 .

[14]  R. Macnab,et al.  The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  R. W. Douglass,et al.  Book review: Basics of the finite element method , 1986 .

[16]  L. Segel,et al.  Model for chemotaxis. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  R. Macnab,et al.  Sensing the Environment , 1980 .

[18]  C. Bradbeer,et al.  Growth rate effects on fundamental transport properties of bacterial populations , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[19]  R. B. Bird,et al.  Transport Properties of Polymeric Liquids , 1992 .