You Are Who Your Friends Are: An Experiment on Trust and Homophily in Friendship Networks

We study the existence of homophily (i.e. the tendency for people to make friends with people who are similar to themselves) with respect to trustworthiness. We ask whether two friends show similarly trustworthy behavior towards strangers, and whether this is anticipated by outsiders. We develop a simple model of bayesian learning in trust games and test the derived hypotheses in a controlled laboratory environment. In the experiment, two trustees sequentially play a trust game with the same trustor, where the trustees depending on treatmen are either friends or strangers to each other. We affirm the existence of homophily with re- spect to trustworthiness. Trustors' beliefs about the trustees' trustfulness are not affected by the knowledge about the (non-)existent friendship between the trustees. Behaviorally, however, they indirectly reciprocate the (un-)trustworthy behavior of one trustee towards his/her friends in later interactions.

[1]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  The strategy method lowers measured trustworthy behavior , 2009 .

[2]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[3]  P. Dasgupta.  Trust as a commodity , 1988 .

[4]  Stephen Leider,et al.  What Do We Expect From Our Friends , 2009 .

[5]  Leeat Yariv,et al.  Homophily in Peer Groups , 2012 .

[6]  M. Mobius,et al.  How Much is a Friend Worth? Directed Altruism and Enforced Reciprocity in Social Networks , 2007 .

[7]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  F. Strack,et al.  Culture, trust, and social networks , 2008 .

[9]  Ben Greiner,et al.  An Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments , 2004 .

[10]  Brian W. Rogers,et al.  Meeting Strangers and Friends of Friends: How Random are Social Networks? , 2007 .

[11]  Gerard Delanty.  The Foundations of Social Theory , 2009 .

[12]  A. Schotter,et al.  An Experimental Study of Belief Learning Using Elicited Beliefs , 2002 .

[13]  Fabian Winter,et al.  A sociological perspective on measuring social norms by means of strategy method experiments , 2009 .

[14]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[15]  R. Brandis.  The Limits of Organization , 1975 .

[16]  Elaine Hatfield,et al.  EPILOGUE – The Dangers of Intimacy , 1984 .

[17]  Third Party Assessments in Trust Problems with Conflict of Interest: An Experiment on the Effects of Promises , 2013 .

[18]  Leeat Yariv,et al.  The 1/d Law of Giving , 2010 .

[19]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  The Evolution of Social and Economic Networks , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[20]  Georg Weizsäcker,et al.  Beliefs and Actions in the Trust Game: Creating Instrumental Variables to Estimate the Causal Effect , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[21]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .

[22]  C. Loomis.  Political and occupational cleavages in a Hanoverian village, Germany : a sociometric study , 1946 .

[23]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[24]  Huan Liu,et al.  Exploiting homophily effect for trust prediction , 2013, WSDM.

[25]  Tian Zheng,et al.  Segregation in Social Networks Based on Acquaintanceship and Trust , 2011, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Trust and nuanced profile similarity in online social networks , 2009, TWEB.