The facilitators of interagency working in the context of European public service reform

ABSTRACT This article provides an overview of key lessons about the governance and leadership of interagency working in multi-level contexts. The article is based on interviews with local and national leaders across Europe. This topic is timely given the complexity of European public sector governance which demands leadership, co-production, and styles of collaboration which promote partnership-working within local contexts. We highlight that localism is central but this still requires national political leadership for localism to be managed and delivered effectively. In other words, empowerment-heavy models of governance, without top-down support, risks interagency ineffectiveness or even failure. We argue that leadership at macro, meso and micro levels of the governance system is required in order for successful interagency working to be delivered. We find that removing the barriers to interagency working requires the identification of an interagency leader (and to even enshrine this within statute), clear roles and lines of accountability for professionals, a breakdown of disciplinary silos, non-tokenistic bottom-up approaches, national public service leadership which promotes capacity building, and the dovetailing of planning and evaluation. The article concludes by proposing strategies for developing effective multi-level interagency working.

[1]  C. McMullin Challenging the necessity of New Public Governance: Co‐production by third sector organizations under different models of public management , 2020, Public Administration.

[2]  Oli Williams,et al.  Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production , 2020, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[3]  J. Edelenbos,et al.  How do network characteristics influence network managers’ choice of strategies? , 2020, Public Money & Management.

[4]  S. McGillivray,et al.  How co-production and co-creation is understood, implemented and sustained as part of improvement programme delivery within the health and social care context in Scotland: final report , 2020 .

[5]  Luke Wolfenden,et al.  Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool: A decision support tool for health policy makers and implementers , 2020, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[6]  D. Waschbusch,et al.  Feasibility and effectiveness of implementing an integrated care model for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in primary care pediatrics , 2019, International Journal of Integrated Care.

[7]  W. N. Dunn,et al.  Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 2017 .

[8]  M. Mackenzie,et al.  Working-class discourses of politics, policy and health: ‘I don’t smoke; I don’t drink. The only thing wrong with me is my health’ , 2017 .

[9]  Luís Araújo,et al.  Modelos de análise das políticas públicas , 2016 .

[10]  J. Connolly Contribution analysis as an approach to enable public managers to demonstrate public value: The Scottish context , 2016 .

[11]  Zhuang Fengqing,et al.  Patients’ Responsibilities in Medical Ethics , 2016 .

[12]  E. Klijn,et al.  The Shift toward Network Governance : Drivers, Characteristics and Manifestations , 2016 .

[13]  T. Burns,et al.  Governing Education in a Complex World. Educational Research and Innovation. , 2016 .

[14]  R. Pyper Public administration, public management and governance , 2015 .

[15]  R. Klevit,et al.  One size does not fit all: The oligomeric states of αB crystallin , 2013, FEBS letters.

[16]  B. Peters,et al.  Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm , 2012 .

[17]  Jon Pierre,et al.  Interactive GovernanceAdvancing the Paradigm , 2012 .

[18]  Marian Kelley,et al.  One size does not fit all. , 2011, Bioanalysis.

[19]  W. Kickert Public Management Reform in Continental Europe: National Distinctiveness , 2010 .

[20]  A. Cheung NPM in Asian Countries , 2010 .

[21]  J. Halligan NPM in Anglo-Saxon Countries , 2010 .

[22]  H. F. Hansen NPM in Scandinavia , 2010 .

[23]  S. Maslin-Prothero,et al.  Integrated team working: a literature review , 2010, International journal of integrated care.

[24]  T. Macculloch Context is everything , 2008, Issues in mental health nursing.

[25]  Geraldine Macdonald,et al.  The challenges of joint working: lessons from the Supporting People Health Pilot evaluation , 2007, International journal of integrated care.

[26]  Louise Collie,et al.  Working Together for Children , 2007, Australian and International Journal of Rural Education.

[27]  M. Turner From commitment to consequences , 2006 .

[28]  C. Greve Public management reform in Denmark , 2006 .

[29]  S. Osborne Editorial: Public management reviewachieves ISI accreditation , 2006 .

[30]  D. Heenan,et al.  The Integration of Health and Social Care: The Lessons from Northern Ireland , 2006 .

[31]  M. Themessl-Huber,et al.  Professional perceptions of joint working in primary care and social care services for older people in Scotland , 2005, Journal of interprofessional care.

[32]  C. Pollitt The New Public Management in international perspective : An analysis of impacts and effects , 2005 .

[33]  United Kingdom Parliament,et al.  Children Act 2004 , 2004 .

[34]  H. Daniels,et al.  Interagency collaboration : a review of the literature : TLRPIII : learning in and for interagency working , 2004 .

[35]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  CLARIFYING CONVERGENCE. Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform , 2001 .

[36]  P. Robertson,et al.  Interorganizational collaboration in social service organizations: A study of the prerequisites to success , 2000 .

[37]  G. Vinten Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis , 2000 .

[38]  E. Rofes,et al.  Context is Everything: Thoughts on Effective HIV Prevention and Gay Men in the United States , 1998 .

[39]  G. Stoker Introduction: trends in Western European local government , 1991 .

[40]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[41]  F. Thompson Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services , 1983 .

[42]  D. Yates,et al.  Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services , 1981, Michigan Law Review.

[43]  Allan McConnell Rethinking wicked problems as political problems and policy problems , 2017 .

[44]  Johanna Kuhlmann,et al.  Opening Up Opportunities and Risks? Retrenchment, Activation and Targeting as Main Trends of Recent Welfare State Reforms Across Europe , 2016 .

[45]  L. Borghans,et al.  Governing education in a complex world , 2016 .

[46]  Tina Nabatchi,et al.  An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance , 2012 .

[47]  G. Davidson,et al.  Families experiencing multiple adversities: a review of the international literature , 2012 .

[48]  Catherine Needham,et al.  Co-production: an emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation , 2012 .

[49]  John Siraj-Blatchford,et al.  Improving development outcomes for children through effective practice in integrating early years services , 2009 .

[50]  S. Rose-Ackerman From Elections to Democracy: Preface , 2005 .

[51]  A. Massey,et al.  Public Management and Modernisation in Britain , 2005 .

[52]  Mark Bevir,et al.  Interpreting British Governance , 2003 .

[53]  Paul Williams,et al.  The Competent Boundary Spanner , 2002 .

[54]  R. Torstendahl,et al.  Public management and administrative reform in Western Europe , 1999 .

[55]  J. Hesse Administrative transformation in Central and Eastern Europe : towards public sector reform in post-communist societies , 1993 .