Abstract The networking of 464 venture capital firms is analyzed by examining their joint investments in a sample of 1501 portfolio companies for the period 1966–1982. Some of the factors that influence the amount of networking are the innovativeness, technology, stage, and industry of the portfolio company. Using the resource exchange model, we reason that the relative amount of networking is explained primarily by the degree of uncertainty associated with an investment rather than by the sum of money invested. Among the findings of our study about venture capitalists are the following: The top 61 venture capital firms that managed 57% of the pool of venture capital in 1982 had an extensive network. Three out of four portfolio companies had at least one of the top 61 venture capital firms as an investor. Those top 61 firms network among themselves and with other venture capital firms. Hence they have considerable influence. Sharing of information seems to be more important than spreading of financial risk as a reason for networking. There is no difference in the degree of co-investing of large venture capital firms—those with the deep pockets—and small firms. Furthermore, where there is more uncertainty, there is more co-investing, even though the average amount invested per portfolio company is less. That, we argue, is evidence that the primary reason for co-investing is sharing of knowledge rather than spreading of financial risk. Venture capital firms gain access to the network by having knowledge that other firms need. It is likely that there will be increasing specialization by venture capital firms. Knowledge is an important distinctive competence of venture capital firms. That knowledge includes information such as innovations, technology, and people in specific industry segments. Among the portfolios of the top 61 venture capital firms are ones with a concentration of low innovative companies, others with a concentration of high innovative technology companies, and others with a no particular concentration. As technology changes rapidly and grows more and more complex, we expect that venture capitalists will increasingly specialize according to type of companies in which they invest. Only the largest firms with many venture capitalists will be like “department stores,” which invest in all types of companies. The smaller firms with only a few venture capitalists will tend to be more like “boutiques” which invest in specific types of companies, or in specific geographical regions around the world. We think that the networking of venture capital firms has the following implications for entrepreneurs: Entrepreneurs should seek funds from venture firms that are known to invest in their type of product. It speeds the screening process. If the venture capital firm decides to invest, it can syndicate the investment through its network of similar firms. And after the investment has been made, the venture capital firms can bring substantial expertise to the entrepreneur's company. Entrepreneurs should not hawk their business plans indiscriminately. Through their networks, venture firms become aware of plans that have been rejected by other firms. A plan that gets turned down several times is unlikely to be funded. Thus it is better to approach venture capital firms selectively. The extensive network of the leading venture capital firms probably facilitates the setting of a “market rate” for the funds they invest. The going rate for venture capital is not posted daily. Nevertheless, details of the most recent deals are rapidly disseminated through venture capitalists' networks. Hence, that helps to set an industry-wide rate for the funds being sought by entrepreneurs. Lastly, we give the following advice to strategic planners: Venture capital firms share strategic information that is valuable to others outside their network. Since they often invest in companies with emerging products and services, venture capitalists gather valuable strategic information about future innovations and technological trends. Thus, strategic planners should tap into venture capitalists' networks, and thereby gain access to that information. It is sometimes information of the sort that can revolutionize an industry.
[1]
G. Baty.
Entrepreneurship for the Eighties
,
1981
.
[2]
Michael J. Roberts,et al.
New business ventures and the entrepreneur
,
1974
.
[3]
Everett M. Rogers,et al.
Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research
,
1980
.
[4]
F. Tönnies.
Community and Association
,
1956
.
[5]
Mark S. Granovetter.
T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED
,
1983
.
[6]
E. Herman.
Corporate Control, Corporate Power
,
1982
.
[7]
William D. Bygrave,et al.
Venture capital's role in financing innovation for economic growth
,
1986
.
[8]
J. Pfeffer,et al.
The External Control of Organizations.
,
1978
.
[9]
William D. Bygrave,et al.
The structure of the investment networks of venture capital firms
,
1988
.
[10]
Howard H. Stevenson,et al.
Capital market myopia
,
1985
.
[11]
M. Shubik,et al.
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm.
,
1964
.
[12]
Rolf T. Wigand,et al.
Book reviewCommunication networks: Towards a new paradigm for research: Everett M. ROGERS and D. Lawrence KINCAID, (Free Press, New York, 1981) pp.xiv + 386, $19.95
,
1983
.
[13]
Shorey Peterson,et al.
The Modern Corporation and Private Property.
,
1933
.
[14]
George Kozmetsky,et al.
Financing and Managing Fast-Growth Companies: The Venture Capital Process
,
1985
.
[15]
Robert K. Kazanjian.
The organizational evolution of high technology ventures : the impact of stage of growth on the nature of structure and planning processes
,
1983
.