The role of founder CEO and independent board in family firms' international growth: evidence from India and Italy

PurposeThis paper investigates the role of the founder CEO and board independence in shaping the way in which Indian and Italian family firms (FFs) pursue international growth via two modes, that is exports and FDI. This article claims that country's context matters in determining the relationship between the presence of the founder CEO and FFs' extent of exports and extent of FDI. Further, this article examines the moderating role of board independence on the above-mentioned founder CEO–FF's international growth relationship.Design/methodology/approachUsing a fixed-effect panel data method, this article tests the hypotheses on a sample of 1,275 Indian FF-year observations and 705 Italian FF-year observations over the period 2008–2015.FindingsThis article reveals that the presence of a founder CEO is positively associated with the extent of exports but negatively associated with the extent of FDI in Italian firms. However, in case of Indian firms, the presence of the founder CEO is negatively associated with the extent of exports as well as with the extent of FDI. This founder CEO's influence on the firm's international growth is mitigated by the presence of an independent board in Italian firms; however, this moderation is not significant in the case of Indian firms.Research limitations/implicationsIt is important to capture heterogeneity within family firms and across institutional contexts while studying family firms' international growth. Further, it is important for international business scholars to theorize for different modes of international growth because challenges faced in expansion via exports are different from the challenges faced in expansion via FDI (foreign subsidiaries). Therefore, family firms leadership might prefer a certain mode of international growth.Practical implicationsThe findings of the study imply that national culture and institutional context could play an important role in determining (a) Founder CEO's inclination towards FF's extent of exports and FDI as well as (b) the effectiveness of an independent board in mitigating founder CEO's influence on FF's international growth.Originality/valueThis work is one of the very few studies that examines the impact of FF's heterogeneity and country heterogeneity on two modes of international growth, namely exports and FDI, in the Indian and Italian contexts. Further, this work provides empirical evidence on the independent board's role in mitigating founder CEO's influence in decision making in the case of Italian firms. Extant literature expects an independent board to encourage FFs' international growth both via exports and FDI; this study shows that independent boards could reduce the founder CEO's inclination towards exports and mitigate founder CEO's influence on the decision making; however, this mitigation effect is highly context dependent.

[1]  B. Boyd,et al.  Board of director effectiveness and informal institutions: A meta‐analysis , 2022, Global Strategy Journal.

[2]  Vanessa Diaz-Moriana,et al.  Unveiling the global focus-performance relationship in family firms: The role of the board of directors , 2022, International Business Review.

[3]  F. Chirico,et al.  Family firm internationalization: Past research and an agenda for the future , 2021, Journal of International Business Studies.

[4]  Guoli Chen,et al.  Does Nepotism Run in the Family? CEO Pay and Pay-Performance Sensitivity in Indian Family Firms , 2020 .

[5]  L. Piscitello,et al.  The role of family firms’ generational heterogeneity in the entry mode choice in foreign markets , 2020 .

[6]  R. S. Upadhyayula,et al.  Limiting role of resource dependence: an examination of director interlocks, board meetings and family ownership , 2020 .

[7]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Behind the internationalization of family SMEs: A strategy tripod synthesis , 2020, Global Strategy Journal.

[8]  G. Probst,et al.  Opening the black box: Unpacking board involvement in innovation , 2019, Strategic Organization.

[9]  Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki,et al.  Riding the waves of family firm internationalization: A systematic literature review, integrative framework, and research agenda , 2020, Journal of World Business.

[10]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  Impact of informal institutions on the prevalence, strategy, and performance of family firms: A meta-analysis , 2020, Journal of International Business Studies.

[11]  Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki,et al.  Process in family business internationalisation: The state of the art and ways forward , 2020 .

[12]  Birgit Feldbauer-Durstmüller,et al.  Management control in multinational companies: a systematic literature review , 2019 .

[13]  S. Sciascia,et al.  Family CEO and board service: Turning the tide for export scope in family SMEs , 2019, International Business Review.

[14]  A. Calabrò,et al.  Family firms' international make-or-buy decisions: Captive offshoring, offshore outsourcing, and the role of home region focus , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[15]  M. Hitt,et al.  A missing link in family firms’ internationalization research: Family structures , 2019, Journal of International Business Studies.

[16]  K. Eddleston,et al.  When a high-quality niche strategy is not enough to spur family-firm internationalization: The role of external and internal contexts , 2019, Journal of International Business Studies.

[17]  F. Kellermanns,et al.  How family firm characteristics affect internationalization of Chinese family SMEs , 2018, Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

[18]  Josip Kotlar,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation in family SMEs: Unveiling the (actual) impact of the Board of Directors , 2018, Journal of Business Venturing.

[19]  F. Kellermanns,et al.  More Than Meets the Eye: A Review and Future Directions for the Social Psychology of Socioemotional Wealth , 2018 .

[20]  Allison W. Pearson,et al.  Governance as a Source of Family Firm Heterogeneity , 2018 .

[21]  Todd M. Alessandri,et al.  The Mixed Gamble of Internationalization in Family and Nonfamily Firms: The Moderating Role of Organizational Slack , 2018 .

[22]  Peng-Yu Li.  Top management team characteristics and firm internationalization: The moderating role of the size of middle managers , 2018 .

[23]  F. Frattini,et al.  Family firms in the global economy: Toward a deeper understanding of internationalization determinants, processes, and outcomes , 2018 .

[24]  S. Ray,et al.  How does family involvement affect a firm's internationalization? An investigation of Indian family firms , 2018 .

[25]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  The pursuit of international opportunities in family firms: Generational differences and the role of knowledge‐based resources , 2018 .

[26]  G. Békés,et al.  The ladder of internationalization modes: evidence from European firms , 2018 .

[27]  R. Veliyath,et al.  Ownership Structure and Internationalization of Indian Firms , 2017 .

[28]  L. A. Hill,et al.  The Board's New Innovation Imperative , 2017 .

[29]  A. Calabrò,et al.  Principal-principal conflicts and family firm growth: The moderating role of business family identity , 2017 .

[30]  Jonas Gabrielsson,et al.  Does board independence influence financial performance in IPO firms? The moderating role of the national business system , 2017 .

[31]  A. Delios,et al.  Corporate governance, board networks and growth in domestic and international markets: Evidence from India , 2017 .

[32]  M. Hitt,et al.  Why is Family Firms’ Internationalization Unique? A Meta–Analysis , 2017 .

[33]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  Multilatinas and the Internationalization of Latin American Firms , 2017 .

[34]  A. Yousaf,et al.  Family and state ownership, internationalization and corporate board-gender diversity: Evidence from China and India , 2017 .

[35]  Sarah A. Humphries,et al.  National culture and corporate governance codes , 2017 .

[36]  Gabriel R. G. Benito,et al.  The Benefits of Internationalization for State‐Owned Enterprises , 2016 .

[37]  Cheng-Feng Cheng,et al.  Family firm internationalization: A configurational approach , 2016 .

[38]  Thomas Hutzschenreuter,et al.  Speed of Internationalization of New Business Units: The Impact of Direct and Indirect Learning , 2016 .

[39]  Orhun Guldiken,et al.  Too much of a good thing: Board monitoring and R&D investments , 2016 .

[40]  L. Piscitello,et al.  Family involvement and firms’ establishment mode choice in foreign markets , 2016 .

[41]  Hernan Herrera-Echeverry,et al.  Export Behavior and Board Independence in Colombian Family Firms: The Reverse Causality Relationship , 2016 .

[42]  B. Nielsen,et al.  Home country institutions and the internationalization of state owned enterprises: A cross-country analysis , 2016 .

[43]  Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra.  Multilatinas as Sources of New Research Insights: The Learning and Escape Drivers of International Expansion , 2015 .

[44]  Hsin-Hsien Liu,et al.  A rational normative model of international expansion: Strategic intent perspective, market positions, and founder CEOs/family-successor CEOs , 2015 .

[45]  Wim Voordeckers,et al.  The relationship between the board of directors and firm performance in private family firms: A test of the demographic versus behavioral approach , 2015, Journal of Management & Organization.

[46]  L. Gnan,et al.  Does Family Involvement Influence Firm Performance? Exploring the Mediating Effects of Board Processes and Tasks , 2015 .

[47]  Martin Johanson,et al.  Speed of internationalization: Conceptualization, measurement and validation , 2014 .

[48]  Belén Usero,et al.  How may the nature of family firms explain the decisions concerning international diversification , 2014 .

[49]  Lihua Wang,et al.  Chinese Private Firms and Internationalization , 2014 .

[50]  A. Calabrò,et al.  The Internationalization of Family Firms , 2014 .

[51]  R. Veliyath,et al.  Family firms and internationalization‐governance relationships: Evidence of secondary agency issues , 2014 .

[52]  Rejie George,et al.  Internationalization and performance: A contextual analysis of Indian firms , 2013 .

[53]  Carmelo Cennamo,et al.  Preserving Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms: Asset or Liability? The Moderating Role of Business Context , 2013 .

[54]  A. Calabrò,et al.  How do boards of directors contribute to family SME export intensity? The role of formal and informal governance mechanisms , 2013 .

[55]  Guido Corbetta,et al.  Is family leadership always beneficial , 2013 .

[56]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Institutions, Resources, and Internationalization of Emerging Economy Firms , 2013 .

[57]  M. Hitt,et al.  Internationalization of Family–Controlled Firms: A Study of the Effects of External Involvement in Governance , 2012 .

[58]  Daniel T. Holt.  Article Commentary: Strategic Decisions within Family Firms: Understanding the Controlling Family's Receptivity to Internationalization , 2012 .

[59]  Pingli Li.  Is There an Expectations Gap in the Roles of Independent Directors? An Explorative Study of Listed Chinese Companies , 2012 .

[60]  M. Hitt,et al.  Why Can’t a Family Business Be More Like a Nonfamily Business? , 2012 .

[61]  Luis R. Gomez-Mejia,et al.  Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms , 2012 .

[62]  Wen-Ting Lin.  Family ownership and internationalization processes: Internationalization pace, internationalization scope, and internationalization rhythm , 2012 .

[63]  K. Eddleston,et al.  Home-region focus and performance of family firms: The role of family vs non-family leaders , 2011 .

[64]  Julio O. De Castro,et al.  The Bind that Ties: Socioemotional Wealth Preservation in Family Firms , 2011 .

[65]  Hsiang‐Lan Chen,et al.  Does Board Independence Influence the Top Management Team? Evidence from Strategic Decisions Toward Internationalization , 2011 .

[66]  C. Barroso,et al.  Board Influence on a Firm's Internationalization , 2011 .

[67]  Cristina Bettinelli.  Boards of Directors in Family Firms: An Exploratory Study of Structure and Group Process , 2011 .

[68]  L. Uhlaner,et al.  Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship , 2010 .

[69]  W. Powell,et al.  Institutions , 2010 .

[70]  Kimberly A. Eddleston,et al.  Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity , 2010 .

[71]  Marianna Makri,et al.  Diversification Decisions in Family-Controlled Firms , 2010 .

[72]  A. Verbeke,et al.  The end of the opportunism vs trust debate: Bounded reliability as a new envelope concept in research on MNE governance , 2009 .

[73]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership , 2009 .

[74]  Danny Miller,et al.  Agency vs. Stewardship in Public Family Firms: A Social Embeddedness Reconciliation , 2009 .

[75]  T. Pedersen,et al.  The Performance of Group‐affiliated Firms during Institutional Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Indian Firms , 2009 .

[76]  James D. Westphal,et al.  What do they know? The effects of outside director acquisition experience on firm acquisition performance , 2008 .

[77]  J. Harrison,et al.  National Culture and the Composition and Leadership Structure of Boards of Directors , 2008 .

[78]  Bruce A. Walters,et al.  CEO ownership and effective boards: impacts on firm outcomes , 2008 .

[79]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies , 2008 .

[80]  H. P. Bowen,et al.  Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort , 2008 .

[81]  Bruce A. Walters,et al.  Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes , 2008 .

[82]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  International Diversification, Business Group Affiliation and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from India , 2008 .

[83]  G. Markarian,et al.  Earnings Management in Family Firms: Evidence From R&D Cost Capitalization in Italy , 2008 .

[84]  B. Elango,et al.  Building capabilities for international operations through networks: a study of Indian firms , 2007 .

[85]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills , 2007 .

[86]  Thomas Zellweger,et al.  Time Horizon, Costs of Equity Capital, and Generic Investment Strategies of Firms , 2007 .

[87]  W. Ng,et al.  ‘Helping the family’: The mediating role of outside directors in ethnic Chinese family firms , 2007 .

[88]  Yasemin Y. Kor,et al.  Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy , 2006 .

[89]  Anita Van gils,et al.  Board Roles in Small and Medium-Sized Family Businesses: Performance and Importance , 2006 .

[90]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Ownership and the Internationalization of Small Firms , 2005 .

[91]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms , 2005 .

[92]  Eric Gedajlovic,et al.  Crossing the Threshold from Founder Management to Professional Management: A Governance Perspective , 2004 .

[93]  C. Salvato,et al.  Self–Serving or Self–Actualizing? Models of Man and Agency Costs in Different Types of Family Firms: A Commentary on “Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non–family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence” , 2004 .

[94]  Teresa Nelson,et al.  The persistence of founder influence: management, ownership, and performance effects at initial public offering , 2003 .

[95]  S. Zahra.  International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses: the effect of ownership and involvement , 2003 .

[96]  A. Hillman,et al.  Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives , 2003 .

[97]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family Firms , 2003 .

[98]  H. Barkema,et al.  Pace, rhythm and scope: Process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation , 2002 .

[99]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  The internationalization and performance of SMEs , 2001 .

[100]  Alan E. Ellstrand,et al.  Composition of the Top Management Team and Firm International Diversification , 2000 .

[101]  O. Williamson.  The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead , 2000 .

[102]  Hildy Teegen,et al.  Export Strategies and Performance of Firms from Emerging Economies: Evidence from Brazil, Chile, and Mexico , 2000 .

[103]  Ramona L. Paetzold,et al.  The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change , 2000 .

[104]  M. Joshi,et al.  The effect of the board and executive committee characteristics on the degree of internationalization , 1998 .

[105]  H. Barkema,et al.  International Expansion Through Start-Up or Acquisition: A Learning Perspective , 1998 .

[106]  Pramodita Sharma,et al.  Strategic Management of the Family Business: Past Research and Future Challenges , 1997 .

[107]  Kannan Ramaswamy,et al.  Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a firm: A Comment , 1996 .

[108]  Fred Luthans,et al.  U.S. Multinationals' Compensation Strategies for Local Management: Cross-Cultural Implications , 1993 .

[109]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  BOARD COMPOSITION FROM A STRATEGIC CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE , 1992 .

[110]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Golden Parachutes: CEOs and the Exercise of Social Influence , 1990 .

[111]  Douglass C. North,et al.  A Transaction Cost Theory of Politics , 1990 .

[112]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.

[113]  G. Hofstede.  Culture and Organizations , 1980 .

[114]  Sabine B. Rau,et al.  Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship , 2015 .

[115]  Sougata Ray,et al.  Third-World Copycats to Emerging Multinationals: Institutional Changes and Organizational Transformation in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[116]  T. Kostova,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise , 1999 .

[117]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  CEO AND DIRECTOR TURNOVER IN FAILING FIRMS: AN ILLUSION OF CHANGE? , 1995 .