Procedures and the professional: the case of the British NHS.

The introduction of procedures to guide medical practice is a growing phenomenon in the British National Health Service. It is thought to be a useful way of managing risk, standardising practice and ensuring that research evidence is incorporated into patient care. However, the mere development and introduction of procedures does not ensure that they are actually followed. In the research reported here focus group methodology was used to investigate the perceptions and opinions of doctors, nurses, midwives and health service managers. Twenty-four focus groups were convened across three hospitals, with discussion focusing on the purpose, development and implementation of clinical protocols. The effect of proceduralisation on professional autonomy and on the working relationships among professional groups also emerged as important themes. The paper concludes that successful implementation of protocols or guidelines in the NHS depends on achieving the right balance between standardising practice and allowing professionals to use clinical judgement. Successful implementation of clinical guidelines also requires that the culture of the health service and the beliefs, attitudes and norms of its employees are taken into account.

[1]  N. Graves,et al.  Hospital Acquired Infection , 1997 .

[2]  N Freemantle,et al.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. , 1995, Quality in health care : QHC.

[3]  J. Knodel,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Focus Group Studies: A Practical Approach , 1993 .

[4]  P. Caper Solving the medical care dilemma. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  M. Enkin,et al.  Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  David L. Morgan,et al.  Successful Focus Groups. , 1994 .

[7]  J Lomas,et al.  Evaluating the Message: The Relationship Between Compliance Rate and the Subject of a Practice Guideline , 1994, Medical care.

[8]  R. Grol,et al.  National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards. , 1990, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[9]  M. Chassin,et al.  Practice guidelines: best hope for quality improvement in the 1990s. , 1990, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[10]  H. Hearnshaw,et al.  Changing the clinical behavior of doctors: a psychological framework. , 1996, Quality in health care : QHC.

[11]  Thomas L. Greenbaum The practical handbook and guide to focus group research , 1987 .

[12]  C. Perrow A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[13]  J. M. Eaton,et al.  Anaesthetic machine checking practices , 1992, Anaesthesia.

[14]  H. Rubin,et al.  Internists' Attitudes about Clinical Practice Guidelines , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.