DESIGN AND USE CRITERIA OF NETTING SYSTEMS FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN ITALY

At the moment, there is a large number of agricultural net typologies on the market characterised by different texture features such as threads, texture, dimensions of fibres and meshing, physical properties such as weight, colours, shading factor, durability, porosity, air permeability and mechanical characteristics such as stress, strength at break and elongation. Protection from hail, wind, snow, or strong rainfall in fruit-farming and ornamentals, shading nets for greenhouses, or nets for moderately modifying the microenvironment are the most common applications. A systematic review of the current state-of-the-art of structural parameters, standard and regulations, most common agricultural applications of nets and their supporting structures has been developed by means of a literature study, technical investigations, interviews with permeable covering producers, specialised greenhouse builders and growers, who are familiar with permeable cladding applications. The interviews were based on questionnaires concerning characteristics, use and disposal of nets. As a result, the survey highlighted that in many cases different, not even similar, net typologies were adopted for the same application and the same cultivations by various growers. Results show that neither growers nor net producers have clear ideas about the relationship between the net typology optimisation for a specific function and the construction parameters of the net. The choice still depends often on empirical or economic criteria and not on scientific considerations. Moreover, it appears that scientifically justified technical requirements for nets used in specific agricultural applications have not been established yet.

[1]  Ada Nissim-Levi,et al.  Coloured shade nets can improve the yield and quality of green decorative branches of Pittosporum variegatum , 2001 .

[2]  B. Alain,et al.  GREENHOUSE MICROCLIMATE AND ITS MANAGEMENT IN MILD WINTER CLIMATES , 1989 .

[3]  G. Murphy,et al.  Experiences with insect exclusion screening of greenhouse vents in Ontario, Canada , 1999 .

[4]  G. la Malfa,et al.  Comparative response of Solanacea to maximum temperature levels in the greenhouse , 1993 .

[5]  Peter Richards,et al.  Full-scale measurements of the effect of a porous windbreak on wind spectra , 1995 .

[6]  S. Shalhevet,et al.  Efficiency of insect exclusion screens for preventing whitefly transmission of tomato yellow leaf curl virus of tomatoes in Israel , 2002, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[7]  Francesco Giuffrida,et al.  EFFECT OF GREENHOUSE COVERING MATERIALS ON TOMATO GROWN DURING HOT MONTHS , 2004 .

[8]  G. M. Richardson A permeable windbreak: its micro-environment and its effect on structural loads , 1987 .

[9]  Giuliano Vox,et al.  Effects of Solar Radiation on the Radiometric Properties of Biodegradable Films for Agricultural Applications , 2004 .

[10]  G. M. Richardson Wind loads on a full-scale film-plastic clad greenhouse: With and without shelter from a windbreak , 1986 .

[11]  Shabtai Cohen,et al.  Measuring and predicting Radiometric Properties of Reflective Shade Nets and Thermal Screens , 1999 .

[12]  G.P.A. Bot,et al.  Analysis of the airflow characteristics of greenhouse screening materials , 1997 .