Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds.

The performance on a conversation-following task by 24 hearing-impaired persons was compared with that of 24 matched controls with normal hearing in the presence of three background noises: (a) speech-spectrum random noise, (b) a male voice, and (c) the male voice played in reverse. The subjects' task was to readjust the sound level of a female voice (signal), every time the signal voice was attenuated, to the subjective level at which it was just possible to understand what was being said. To assess the benefit of lipreading, half of the material was presented audiovisually and half auditorily only. It was predicted that background speech would have a greater masking effect than reversed speech, which would in turn have a lesser masking effect than random noise. It was predicted that hearing-impaired subjects would perform more poorly than the normal-hearing controls in a background of speech. The influence of lipreading was expected to be constant across groups and conditions. The results showed that the hearing-impaired subjects were equally affected by the three background noises and that normal-hearing persons were less affected by the background speech than by noise. The performance of the normal-hearing persons was superior to that of the hearing-impaired subjects. The prediction about lipreading was confirmed. The results were explained in terms of the reduced temporal resolution by the hearing-impaired subjects.

[1]  D. Broadbent.  Perception and communication , 1958 .

[2]  C Speaks,et al.  Effect of a competing message on synthetic sentence identification. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  T W Tillman,et al.  Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  D D Dirks,et al.  Masking effects of speech competing messages. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  D. Dirks,et al.  Effect of pulsed masking on selected speech materials. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  T W Tillman,et al.  Release from multiple maskers: effects of interaural time disparities. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[8]  A. Moffitt,et al.  Consonant cue perception by twenty- to twenty-four-week-old infants. , 1971, Child development.

[9]  C Speaks,et al.  Intelligibility of connected discourse. , 1972, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  Peter D. Eimas,et al.  Auditory and linguistic processing of cues for place of articulation by infants , 1974 .

[11]  J. Goodman,et al.  Perceptual masking of spondees by combinations of talkers , 1975 .

[12]  The effect of vowel consonant ratio and sentence length on lipreading ability. , 1976, American annals of the deaf.

[13]  Ability of hearing-impaired listeners to understand connected discourse. , 1977 .

[14]  R Conrad,et al.  Lip-reading by deaf and hearing children. , 1977, The British journal of educational psychology.

[15]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  J. L. Danhauer,et al.  Effects of four noise competitors on the California Consonant Test. , 1979, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[17]  Herbert A. Colle,et al.  Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: effects of noise intensity and spatial location , 1980 .

[18]  Rehabilitative procedures in sensorineural hearing loss. Studies on the routine used. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[19]  A. Liberman.  On Finding That Speech Is Special , 1982 .

[20]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Hearing deficiency, speechreading and memory functions. , 1982, Scandinavian Audiology.

[21]  M Studdert-Kennedy.  On learning to speak. , 1983, Human neurobiology.

[22]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[23]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Speechreading performance evaluated by means of TV and real-life presentation. A comparison between a normally hearing, moderately and profoundly hearing-impaired group. , 1983, Scandinavian audiology.

[24]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Speech competition effects on synthetic stop-vowel perception by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  B Hagerman,et al.  Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.

[26]  R M Cox,et al.  Intelligibility ratings of continuous discourse: application to hearing aid selection. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  P C Doyle,et al.  Effects of Noise on NST and NU 6 Stimuli , 1985, Ear and hearing.

[28]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[29]  A. Macleod,et al.  Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. , 1987, British journal of audiology.

[30]  Guessing and speechreading. , 1987, British journal of audiology.

[31]  J. Richard Jennings,et al.  Editorial Policy on Analyses of Variance With Repeated Measures , 1987 .

[32]  J. Thayer,et al.  The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[33]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music , 1988 .

[34]  J. Rönnberg,et al.  Information-processing skill and speech-reading. , 1989, British journal of audiology.

[35]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Effects of Background Music on Phonological Short-Term Memory , 1989 .

[36]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  G F Smoorenburg,et al.  Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.