Abstraction and Insight: Building Better Conceptual Systems to Support More Effective Social Change

When creating theory to understand or implement change at the social and/or organizational level, it is generally accepted that part of the theory building process includes a process of abstraction. While the process of abstraction is well understood, it is not so well understood how abstractions “fit” together to enable the creation of better theory. Starting with a few simple ideas, this paper explores one way we work with abstractions. This exploration challenges the traditionally held importance of abstracting concepts from experience. That traditional focus has been one-sided—pushing science toward the discovery of data without the balancing process that occurs with the integration of the data. Without such balance, the sciences have been pushed toward fragmentation. Instead, in the present paper, new emphasis is placed on the relationship between abstract concepts. Specifically, this paper suggests that a better theory is one that is constructed of concepts that exist on a similar level of abstraction. Suggestions are made for quantifying this claim and using the insights to enable scholars and practitioners to create more effective theory.

[1]  Luc Bernier,et al.  The Changing Nature of Public Entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[2]  W. James A Pluralistic Universe: Hibbert Lectures at Manchester College on the Present Situation in Philosophy , 2010 .

[3]  T. Fuller,et al.  Moving beyond metaphor , 2000 .

[4]  Robert MacIntosh,et al.  Conditioned emergence: a dissipative structures approach to transformation , 1999 .

[5]  Sandra Schruijer,et al.  The use of cognitive mapping in eliciting and evaluating group cognitions , 2010 .

[6]  L. Feuer Varieties of Scientific Experience: Emotive Aims in Scientific Hypotheses , 1995 .

[7]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  From a Logical Point of View , 1955 .

[8]  R. Stacey Complexity and Creativity in Organizations , 1996 .

[9]  Richard P. Appelbaum,et al.  Theories of social change , 1970 .

[10]  Steven E. Wallis Seeking the robust core of organisational learning theory , 2009 .

[11]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[12]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[13]  B. Kuipers The "Map in the Head" Metaphor , 1982 .

[14]  G. Daneke FROM METAPHOR TO METHOD: NONLINEAR SCIENCE AND PRACTICAL MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[15]  Patricia J. Rogers,et al.  Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of Interventions , 2008 .

[16]  Dvora Yanow,et al.  Methodology by Metaphor: Ways of Seeing in Painting and Research , 2008 .

[17]  S. Ghoshal Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices , 2005 .

[18]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier , 2000 .

[19]  R. Dekkers Adapting organizations: the instance of business process re‐engineering , 2008 .

[20]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[21]  Lawrence Fedigan Conceptual Systems Theory and Teaching , 1973 .

[22]  Don Ambrose Unifying theories of creativity: Metaphorical thought and the unification process , 1996 .

[23]  Steven E. Wallis Toward a Science of Metatheory , 2010 .

[24]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Integrative complexity of American and Soviet foreign policy rhetoric: A time-series analysis. , 1985 .

[25]  Steven E. Wallis Validation of Theory: Exploring and Reframing Popper's Worlds , 2008 .

[26]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Steven E. Wallis How to Choose between Policy Proposals: A Simple Tool Based on Systems Thinking and Complexity Theory , 2013 .

[28]  G. Morgan Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organizational Theory. , 1980 .

[29]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  Moving HR to a higher level: HR practices and organizational effectiveness. , 2000 .

[30]  Steven E. Wallis Developing effective ethics for effective behavior , 2010 .

[31]  Ken Friedman,et al.  Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods , 2003 .

[32]  D. Robbins,et al.  Vygotsky's psychology-philosophy : a metaphor for language theory and learning , 2001 .

[33]  Martin E. Smith Changing an organisation’s culture: correlates of success and failure , 2003 .

[34]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  The Idols of Organizational Theory , 2001 .

[35]  Steven E. Wallis The Structure of Theory and the Structure of Scientific Revolutions: What Constitutes an Advance in Theory? , 2010 .

[36]  Steven E. Wallis A Systems Approach to Understanding Theory: Finding the Core, Identifying Opportunities for Improvement, and Integrating Fragmented Fields , 2014 .

[37]  H. Letiche,et al.  Answers to a Discussion Note: On the 'Metaphor of the Metaphor' , 1998 .

[38]  Debora R. Hammond,et al.  The Science of Synthesis: Exploring the Social Implications of General Systems Theory , 2010 .

[39]  Marcia Seabury Critical Thinking via the Abstraction Ladder , 1991, English Journal.

[40]  D. Hung Metaphorical Ideas as Mediating Artifacts for the Social Construction of Knowledge: Implications from the Writings of Dewey and Vygotsky , 2002 .

[41]  John Shotter,et al.  ‘Inside the Moment of Managing’: Wittgenstein and the Everyday Dynamics of Our Expressive-Responsive Activities , 2005 .

[42]  Paul Thagard,et al.  The AHA! Experience: Creativity Through Emergent Binding in Neural Networks , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development , 1999 .

[44]  Stephen A. Bernhardt,et al.  Metaphor and Knowledge: The Challenges of Writing Science , 2003 .

[45]  P. Morrison,et al.  The development of the concept of electric charge : electricity from the Greeks to Coulomb , 1955 .

[46]  Gregory A. Daneke,et al.  Systemic Choices: Nonlinear Dynamics and Practical Management , 1999 .

[47]  Gibson Burrell,et al.  Antonio Haro, pandemonium. Towards a retro-organizational theory, Londres, sage publications, 1997 , 2000 .