Summaries of recent phlebological abstracts

BACKGROUND Endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy are recommended alternatives to surgery for the treatment of primary varicose veins, but their long-term comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. METHODS In a randomized, controlled trial involving 798 participants with primary varicose veins at 11 centers in the United Kingdom, we compared the outcomes of laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and surgery. Primary outcomes at 5 years were disease-specific quality of life and generic quality of life, as well as cost-effectiveness based on models of expected costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained that used data on participants' treatment costs and scores on the EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaire. RESULTS Quality-of-life questionnaires were completed by 595 (75%) of the 798 trial participants. After adjustment for baseline scores and other covariates, scores on the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (on which scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating a better quality of life) were lower among patients who underwent laser ablation or surgery than among those who underwent foam sclerotherapy (effect size [adjusted differences between groups] for laser ablation vs. foam sclerotherapy, -2.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.49 to -1.22; P<0.001; and for surgery vs. foam sclerotherapy, -2.60; 95% CI, -3.99 to -1.22; P<0.001). Generic quality-of-life measures did not differ among treatment groups. At a threshold willingness-to-pay ratio of £20,000 ($28,433 in U.S. dollars) per QALY, 77.2% of the cost-effectiveness model iterations favored laser ablation. In a two-way comparison between foam sclerotherapy and surgery, 54.5% of the model iterations favored surgery. CONCLUSIONS In a randomized trial of treatments for varicose veins, disease-specific quality of life 5 years after treatment was better after laser ablation or surgery than after foam sclerotherapy. The majority of the probabilistic cost-effectiveness model iterations favored laser ablation at a willingness-to-pay ratio of £20,000 ($28,433) per QALY. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research; CLASS Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN51995477.).

[1]  M. Venermo,et al.  Five‐year follow‐up of a randomized clinical trial comparing open surgery, foam sclerotherapy and endovenous laser ablation for great saphenous varicose veins , 2018, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  B. Eklof,et al.  Comparison of endovenous ablation techniques, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Extended 5-year follow-up of a RCT. , 2017, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[3]  S. Gauw,et al.  Five-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial comparing saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anesthesia. , 2016, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  A. Davies,et al.  A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Surgery, Endothermal Ablation, Ultrasound-guided Foam Sclerotherapy and Compression Stockings for Symptomatic Varicose Veins. , 2015, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[5]  T. Vogt,et al.  Same Site Recurrence is More Frequent After Endovenous Laser Ablation Compared with High Ligation and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein: 5 year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial (RELACS Study). , 2015, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[6]  T. Nijsten,et al.  Five‐year results of a randomized clinical trial of conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound‐guided foam sclerotherapy in patients with great saphenous varicose veins , 2015, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  Sara A Baker,et al.  Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser ablation and surgery for varicose veins: results from the Comparison of LAser, Surgery and foam Sclerotherapy (CLASS) randomised controlled trial. , 2015, Health technology assessment.

[8]  I. Chetter,et al.  Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovenous Laser Ablation Versus Conventional Surgery for Small Saphenous Varicose Veins , 2013, Annals of surgery.

[9]  C. Ramsay,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness of ultrasound‐guided foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser ablation or surgery as treatment for primary varicose veins from the randomized CLASS trial , 2014, The British journal of surgery.

[10]  Sara A Baker,et al.  A randomized trial comparing treatments for varicose veins. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  B. Eklof,et al.  Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins with 3-year follow-up. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders.

[12]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive techniques to manage varicose veins: a systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2013, Health technology assessment.

[13]  T. Stijnen,et al.  Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[14]  B. Eklof,et al.  Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with clinical and duplex outcome after 5 years. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[15]  G. Geroulakos,et al.  Cost and effectiveness of laser with phlebectomies compared with foam sclerotherapy in superficial venous insufficiency. Early results of a randomised controlled trial. , 2012, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[16]  Stefan Gräber,et al.  Comparable effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation and high ligation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial (RELACS study). , 2012, Archives of dermatology.

[17]  B. Eklof,et al.  Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins , 2011, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  F. Mazari,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins , 2011, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  Ian R White,et al.  Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  A. Davies,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness of traditional and endovenous treatments for varicose veins , 2010, The British journal of surgery.

[21]  M. Lawaetz,et al.  Randomised clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: clinical outcome and recurrence after 2 years. , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[22]  T. Klem,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Dutch translated Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire. , 2009, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[23]  D. Dellagrammaticas,et al.  Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with surgery for the treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins , 2008, The British journal of surgery.

[24]  M. Abdalla,et al.  Responsiveness of the SF-36 and a condition-specific measure of health for patients with varicose veins , 1996, Quality of Life Research.

[25]  A. Davies,et al.  A comparison of health-related quality of life of patients with primary and recurrent varicose veins , 2003 .

[26]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 Health Survey Update , 2000, Spine.

[27]  A. Davies,et al.  Evaluating and improving health-related quality of life in patients with varicose veins. , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  J. Buckingham,et al.  Towards measurement of outcome for patients with varicose veins. , 1993, Quality in health care : QHC.