Applying the decision moving window to risky choice: Comparison of eye-tracking and mouse-tracing methods

Currently, a disparity exists between the process-level models decision researchers use to describe and predict decision behavior and the methods implemented and metrics collected to test these models. The current work seeks to remedy this disparity by combining the advantages of work in decision research (mouse-tracing paradigms with contingent information display) and cognitive psychology (eye-tracking paradigms from reading and scene perception). In particular, we introduce a new decision moving-window paradigm that presents stimulus information contingent on eye fixations. We provide data from the first application of this method to risky decision making, and show how it compares to basic eye-tracking and mouse-tracing methods. We also enumerate the practical, theoretical, and analytic advantages this method offers above and beyond both mouse-tracing with occlusion and basic eye tracking of information without occlusion. We include the use of new metrics that offer more precision than those typically calculated on mouse-tracing data as well as those not possible or feasible within the mouse-tracing paradigm.

[1]  Rong-Fuh Day,et al.  Examining the validity of the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm in identifying decision strategy with eye-movement data , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  Visual perception and sequences of eye movement fixations: a stochastic modeling approach , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[3]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  How Distinct are Intuition and Deliberation? An Eye-Tracking Analysis of Instruction-Induced Decision Modes , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[4]  Andrew J. Stewart,et al.  Integrating text and pictorial information: eye movements when looking at print advertisements. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  Christopher T. Ball,et al.  A Comparison of Single-Step and Multiple-Step Transition Analyses of Multiattribute Decision Strategies , 1997 .

[6]  D Kahneman,et al.  Perceptual Deficit during a Mental Task , 1967, Science.

[7]  J. Beatty,et al.  Pupillometric signs of brain activation vary with level of cognitive processing. , 1978, Science.

[8]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck,et al.  A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods for Decision Research. A Critical Review and User's Guide , 2011 .

[10]  Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck,et al.  Process Models Deserve Process Data: Comment on Brandstatter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006) , 2008, Psychological review.

[11]  D. Ballard,et al.  Memory Representations in Natural Tasks , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes a Comparison of Two Process Tracing Methods for Choice Tasks , 2022 .

[13]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Pupillary changes in two memory tasks , 1966 .

[14]  A. Glöckner,et al.  Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  John M. Gottman,et al.  Sequential Analysis: A Guide for Behavorial Researchers , 1990 .

[16]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  An eye‐tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes , 2011 .

[17]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  Soft constraints in interactive behavior: the case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[20]  Kang Chen,et al.  Visual Attention and Eye Movements , 2008 .

[21]  Hongyu Sun,et al.  Appendix Figure S1 , 2012 .

[22]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[23]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Eye Fixations on Advertisements and Memory for Brands: A Model and Findings , 2000 .

[24]  J. Beatty.  Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982 .

[25]  Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck,et al.  The role of process data in the development and testing of process models of judgment and decision making , 2011 .

[26]  E. N. A. M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck.  Take a quick click at that! Mouselab and eye-tracking as tools to measure intuition , 2009 .

[27]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  Decision moving window: using interactive eye tracking to examine decision processes , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[28]  A. Glöckner,et al.  Do People Make Decisions Under Risk Based on Ignorance? An Empirical Test of the Priority Heuristic Against Cumulative Prospect Theory , 2008 .