Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality image registration techniques

All retrospective image registration methods have attached to them some intrinsic estimate of registration error. However, this estimate of accuracy may not always be a good indicator of the distance between actual and estimated positions of targets within the cranial cavity. This paper describes a project whose principal goal is to use a prospective method based on fiducial markers as a 'gold standard' to perform an objective, blinded evaluation of the accuracy of several retrospective image-to-image registration techniques. Image volumes of three modalities -- CT, MR, and PET -- were taken of patients undergoing neurosurgery at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. These volumes had all traces of the fiducial markers removed, and were provided to project collaborators outside Vanderbilt, who then performed retrospective registrations on the volumes, calculating transformations from CT to MR and/or from PET to MR, and communicated their transformations to Vanderbilt where the accuracy of each registration was evaluated. In this evaluation the accuracy is measured at multiple 'regions of interest,' i.e. areas in the brain which would commonly be areas of neurological interest. A region is defined in the MR image and its centroid C is determined. Then the prospective registration is used to obtain the corresponding point C' in CT or PET. To this point the retrospective registration is then applied, producing C' in MR. Statistics are gathered on the target registration error (TRE), which is the disparity between the original point C and its corresponding point C'. A second goal of the project is to evaluate the importance of correcting geometrical distortion in MR images, by comparing the retrospective TRE in the rectified images, i.e., those which have had the distortion correction applied, with that of the same images before rectification. This paper presents preliminary results of this study along with a brief description of each registration technique and an estimate of both preparation and execution time needed to perform the registration .

[1]  T. D. CRADDUCK,et al.  A standard protocol for the exchange of nuclear medicine image files , 1989, Nuclear medicine communications.

[2]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  Image registration of multimodality 3-D medical images by chamfer matching , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[4]  K. S. Arun,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  G. Marchal,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997 .

[6]  Christian Barillot,et al.  Multimodal registration system for the fusion of MRI, CT, MEG, and 3D or stereotactic angiographic data , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[7]  G. Malandain,et al.  Physically Based Rigid Registration of 3-D Free-Form Objects : application to Medical Imaging , 1994 .

[8]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Automated multi-modality image registration based on information theory , 1995 .

[9]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Accurate Three‐Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  Robert J. Maciunas,et al.  Registration of multimodal volume head images via attached markers , 1992, Medical Imaging.

[11]  Paul F. Hemler,et al.  Grey value correlation techniques used for automatic matching of CT and MR brain and spine images , 1994, Other Conferences.

[12]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  New approach to 3-D registration of multimodality medical images by surface matching , 1992, Other Conferences.

[13]  Colin Studholme,et al.  Automated 3D Registration of Truncated MR and CT Images of the Head , 1995, BMVC.

[14]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Effect of geometrical distortion correction in MR on image registration accuracy , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[15]  R.J. Maciunas,et al.  An automatic technique for finding and localizing externally attached markers in CT and MR volume images of the head , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Graphics applied to medical image registration , 1991, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[17]  Lewis E. Hitchner,et al.  A standard format for digital image exchange , 1982 .

[18]  G. Malandain,et al.  Rigid registration of 3-D objects by motion analysis , 1994, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[19]  Grégoire Malandain,et al.  Improving Registration of 3-D Medical Images Using a Mechanical Based Method , 1994, ECCV.

[20]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives , 1964, Comput. J..

[21]  J. Michael Fitzpatrick,et al.  A technique for accurate magnetic resonance imaging in the presence of field inhomogeneities , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[22]  P F Hemler,et al.  A versatile system for multimodality image fusion. , 1995, Journal of image guided surgery.