Corporate social responsibility or cause‐related marketing? The role of cause specificity of CSR

Purpose – As cause‐related marketing (CRM) is usually subsumed under corporate social responsibility (CSR), in practice CSR and CRM can serve as different public relations tools. This study aims to compare the effect of CRS and CRM on customer attitude.Design/methodology/approach – In order to overcome various measurement problems, an experiment is conducted in a country characterized by a significant diversity of attitudes towards a cause.Findings – The result indicates that both CSR and CRM have similar positive effects on customers' attitudes. However, while CRM might be more cost‐efficient, its positive effect is limited to customers with high cause affinity. In contrast, CRM has a negative effect on customers with low cause affinity, or who oppose the cause. A major finding is that CRM can compensate for negative CSR to a high degree in the cause affinity segment of the market. Therefore, a high degree of cause specificity of CSR might only be preferable if the market is characterized by broad cause ...

[1]  G. Lantos.  The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility , 2001 .

[2]  Sangeeta Singh,et al.  Overcoming skepticism towards cause related claims: the case of Norway , 2009 .

[3]  Roy William John Endacott.  Consumers and CRM: a national and global perspective , 2004 .

[4]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  How Social-Cause Marketing Affects Consumer Perceptions , 2006 .

[5]  F. Kohlbacher,et al.  The effects of brand‐cause fit and campaign duration on consumer perception of cause‐related marketing in Japan , 2012 .

[6]  Wi-Suk Kwon,et al.  A model of antecedents of consumers' post brand attitude upon exposure to a cause–brand alliance , 2013 .

[7]  Valérie Swaen,et al.  Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Trust , 2008 .

[8]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[9]  Isabelle Maignan,et al.  Consumers' Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibilities: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2001 .

[10]  A. Amran.  Exploring Online Sustainability Disclosure among Malaysian Company , 2012 .

[11]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  The importance of non-linear relationships between attitude and behaviour in policy research , 2007 .

[12]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies , 2003 .

[13]  Elisa Yuholin.  For Business or the Good of All? A Finnish Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2005 .

[14]  Donald R. Lichtenstein,et al.  The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-Supported Nonprofits , 2004 .

[15]  N. Dawar,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and consumers' attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis , 2004 .

[16]  Salvador Ruiz,et al.  The Role of Identity Salience in the Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior , 2009 .

[17]  Minette E. Drumwright,et al.  Company Advertising with a Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria , 1996 .

[18]  G. Odekerken-Schröder,et al.  The effect of strategic and tactical cause‐related marketing on consumers' brand loyalty , 2006 .

[19]  L. Moir.  What do we mean by corporate social responsibility , 2001 .

[20]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Anil Menon,et al.  Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy , 1988 .

[22]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  A Typology of Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing: From Skeptics to Socially Concerned , 1998 .

[23]  Peter Langford,et al.  Evaluating the impact of corporate social responsibility programs on consumers , 2009, Journal of Management & Organization.

[24]  Xueming Luo,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value , 2006 .

[25]  S. Idowu,et al.  Are the corporate social responsibility matters based on good intentions or false pretences? An empirical study of the motivations behind the issuing of CSR reports by UK companies , 2007 .

[26]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  Do Consumers Expect Companies to Be Socially Responsible? the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior , 2001 .

[27]  Ulf H. Richter,et al.  CSR Business as Usual? The Case of the Tobacco Industry , 2005 .

[28]  R. Hill,et al.  The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior , 2006 .

[29]  Amy L. Kristof.  PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS , 1996 .

[30]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2001 .

[31]  Angus Laing,et al.  Linking products to a cause or affinity group:Does this really make them more attractive to consumers? , 2008 .

[32]  Samuel O. Idowu,et al.  A comparative study of the contents of corporate social responsibility reports of UK companies , 2004 .

[33]  R. Chumpitaz,et al.  L'impact de la responsabilité sociétale de l'entreprise sur la confiance des consommateurs , 2008 .

[34]  Xiaoli Nan,et al.  Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Initiatives: Examining the Role of Brand-Cause Fit in Cause-Related Marketing , 2007 .

[35]  Barbara A. Lafferty.  The relevance of fit in a cause-brand alliance when consumers evaluate corporate credibility , 2007 .

[36]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs , 2006 .

[37]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  Identity and the Economics of Organizations , 2005 .

[38]  M. Polonsky,et al.  Understanding issue complexity when building a socially responsible brand , 2006 .

[39]  Anthony D. Miyazaki,et al.  Consumer response to retailer use of cause-related marketing: Is more fit better? , 2007 .

[40]  For business or the good of all? A Finnish approach to corporate social responsibility , 2004 .

[41]  Anne Ellerup Nielsen,et al.  Reporting CSR – what and how to say it? , 2007 .

[42]  Duygu Turker.  Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: A Scale Development Study , 2009 .

[43]  Walter Wymer,et al.  The effect of fit and dominance in cause marketing communications , 2009 .

[44]  Philip Kotler,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause , 2004 .

[45]  John W. Pracejus,et al.  The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns , 2003 .

[46]  Michael Jay Polonsky,et al.  Linking sponsorship and cause related marketing , 2001 .

[47]  Shruti Gupta,et al.  The company‐cause‐customer fit decision in cause‐related marketing , 2006 .

[48]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses , 2005 .