Switching to carbon-free production processes: Implications for carbon leakage and border carbon adjustment

Climate policy under partial global compliance raises concerns regarding carbon leakage. While border carbon adjustment (BCA) measures are a potential remedy, they have also been criticised on various grounds. This paper therefore investigates whether a policy fostering the switch to carbon-free technologies can substitute for BCAs. A reason for the effectiveness of a targeted technology policy is that major leakage prone sectors (such as iron and steel), have two main sources of carbon emissions, combustion of fossil fuels and industrial processes. While combustion emissions can be reduced relatively easy by increasing energy efficiency, reducing process emissions requires a switch to low-carbon production processes, e.g. in steel production by deploying electrolysis based on large-scale solar electricity. We show by means of a multi-regional computable general equilibrium analysis that such a switch in steel production technology can eliminate a significant fraction of carbon leakage and also increase sectoral output and welfare. Since the necessary technologies are not available at large scale yet (however, are likely to be by 2020), a transitional BCA scheme may be a crucial supportive instrument to foster such technology switches. Yet, in the long run BCA should be phased out to preserve the incentive for carbon-free innovation.

[1]  A. Gerlach,et al.  Global Overview on Grid-Parity Event Dynamics , 2010 .

[2]  Antoine Allanore,et al.  Optimized Design of an Iron Electrowinning Cell , 2009 .

[3]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C , 2009, Nature.

[4]  Aijun Li,et al.  Will carbon motivated border tax adjustments function as a threat , 2012 .

[5]  Iris Grossmann,et al.  Distributed solar electricity generation across large geographic areas, Part I: A method to optimize site selection, generation and storage , 2013 .

[6]  V. Kulmer,et al.  The effectiveness of anti-leakage policies in the European Union: results for Austria , 2012 .

[7]  Edward J. Balistreri,et al.  Subglobal carbon policy and the competitive selection of heterogeneous firms , 2012 .

[8]  Karl W. Steininger,et al.  Justice and cost effectiveness of consumption-based versus production-based approaches in the case of unilateral climate policies , 2014 .

[9]  Angel Aguiar,et al.  Initial Preparation of Energy Volume Data for GTAP 7 , 2007 .

[10]  Michael Hübler,et al.  Fair, optimal or detrimental? Environmental vs. strategic use of border carbon adjustment , 2012 .

[11]  Richard Loulou,et al.  Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme , 2005 .

[12]  M. Babiker Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage , 2005 .

[13]  Paul S. Armington A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production (Une théorie de la demande de produits différenciés d'après leur origine) (Una teoría de la demanda de productos distinguiéndolos según el lugar de producción) , 1969 .

[14]  Andreas Lange,et al.  Optimal Emission Pricing in the Presence of International Spillovers: Decomposing Leakage and Terms-of-Trade Motives , 2010 .

[15]  Karl W. Steininger,et al.  The relevance of process emissions for carbon leakage: A comparison of unilateral climate policy options with and without border carbon adjustment , 2012 .

[16]  J. Burniaux,et al.  Carbon leakages: a general equilibrium view , 2012 .

[17]  Huey-Lin Lee,et al.  Modeling Land-use Related Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks and their Mitigation Potential , 2008, GTAP Working Paper.

[18]  Edward J. Balistreri,et al.  The role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy: Overview of an Energy Modeling Forum study (EMF 29) , 2012 .

[19]  Sandra Poncet The Long Term Growth Prospects of the World Economy: Horizon 2050 , 2006 .

[20]  J. D. Beer FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY-EFFICIENT IRON AND STEEL MAKING , 1998 .

[21]  D. H. Bradhurst,et al.  HYDROGEN PRODUCTION AND STORAGE , 1981 .

[22]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol: Regional and Sectoral Contributions to the Carbon Leakage , 2001 .

[23]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Will Border Carbon Adjustments Work? , 2011 .

[24]  T. Fæhn,et al.  Richer and cleaner : At others' expense? , 2009 .

[25]  S. Licht,et al.  High solubility pathway for the carbon dioxide free production of iron. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[26]  Susanne Droege,et al.  Using border measures to address carbon flows , 2011 .

[27]  Donald R. Sadoway,et al.  Electrolysis of Molten Iron Oxide with an Iridium Anode: The Role of Electrolyte Basicity , 2011 .

[28]  W. Nordhaus Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change , 1994 .

[29]  Cooling Down Hot Air: A Global CGE Analysis of Post-Kyoto Carbon Abatement Strategies , 2000 .

[30]  Truong Truong,et al.  An Energy Data Base for GTAP , 1999 .

[31]  Alan K. Fox,et al.  Comparing Policies to Combat Emissions Leakage: Border Carbon Adjustments versus Rebates , 2011 .

[32]  F. Lapicque,et al.  Iron Metal Production by Bulk Electrolysis of Iron Ore Particles in Aqueous Media , 2008 .

[33]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[34]  Lutz Weischer,et al.  A Guide for the Concerned: Guidance on the Elaboration and Implementation of Border Carbon Adjustment , 2012 .

[35]  Marjan W. Hofkes,et al.  Border adjustment for European emissions trading: Competitiveness and carbon leakage , 2010 .

[36]  Damien Ernst,et al.  The Global Grid , 2012, ArXiv.

[37]  Ulf Bossel,et al.  Does a Hydrogen Economy Make Sense? , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[38]  S. Reichelstein,et al.  The Prospects for Cost Competitive Solar PV Power , 2012 .

[39]  Global Energy Assessment Writing Team Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future , 2012 .

[40]  C. Breyer,et al.  Global overview on grid‐parity , 2013 .

[41]  J. Rollo,et al.  Border carbon adjustments and the potential for protectionism , 2011 .

[42]  Alan K. Fox,et al.  Output-Based Allocation of Emissions Permits for Mitigating Tax and Trade Interactions , 2007, Land Economics.

[43]  Onno Kuik,et al.  Trade Liberalization and Carbon Leakage , 2003 .

[44]  Taran Fæhn,et al.  Alternative Designs for Tariffs on Embodied Carbon: A Global Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 2012 .

[45]  Christian Breyer,et al.  Grid-Parity Analysis for EU and US Regions and Market Segments - Dynamics of Grid-Parity and Dependence on Solar Irradiance, Local Electricity Prices and PV Progress Ratio , 2009 .

[46]  Donald R. Sadoway,et al.  Molten Oxide Electrolysis for Iron Production: Identification of Key Process Parameters for Largescale Development , 2011 .

[47]  J. Burniaux,et al.  Carbon Emission Leakages: A General Equilibrium View , 2000 .

[48]  A. Manne,et al.  Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO2 Emission Limits , 1992 .