A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Universal Filtered Multi-Carrier Technique

The Internet of Things (IoT) and machine-to-machine (M2M) communication will play an important role in future communications, but there is currently no ultra-reliable low-latency wireless communication theory that guides its design. For highly mobile vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) wireless communication scenarios, asynchronous transmission should also be accepted. Therefore, it is particularly urgent to study ultra-reliable low-latency wireless transmission technology that satisfies asynchronous transmission. Universal Filter Multi-Carrier (UFMC) is a new type of filtering wireless transmission mechanism that meets this character. Although some of its properties have been explored in recent years, there are few articles that systematically evaluate its performance. In this paper, firstly, the performance of the UFMC system is fully evaluated in terms of spectral efficiency (SE), bit error rate (BER), peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR), carrier frequency offset (CFO), as well as various multipath fading channels, effects of time delay (TD), etc. Meanwhile, a mathematical analysis model is established for the BER of UFMC system, and some exact closed-loop expressions of bit error probabilities for UFMC are derived. Moreover, the equivalent form of the transmitter in the frequency domain is derived. Finally, the Monte Carlo simulation results related to UFMC are presented. The results reveal that UFMC suffers from the same problems as other multi-carrier system, including higher PAPR, affected by CFO, but it has its own inherent advantages such as insensitivity to time delay or energy-efficient, and the main negative factor of UFMC is inter-carrier interference (ICI) not inter-symbol interference (ISI), which may play an important role in future M2M and V2V communication.

[1]  Frank Schaich,et al.  Universal-filtered multi-carrier technique for wireless systems beyond LTE , 2013, 2013 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[2]  N. Cassiau,et al.  Comparative study of 5 G waveform candidates for below 6 GHz air interface , 2016 .

[3]  Taoka Hidekazu,et al.  Scenarios for 5G mobile and wireless communications: the vision of the METIS project , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Markus Rupp,et al.  Filter Bank Multicarrier Modulation Schemes for Future Mobile Communications , 2017, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  Xi Zhang,et al.  On the Waveform for 5G , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Luca Rugini,et al.  BER of OFDM systems impaired by carrier frequency offset in multipath fading channels , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  Amer Baghdadi,et al.  Novel UF-OFDM Transmitter: Significant Complexity Reduction Without Signal Approximation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[8]  Nelson Sollenberger,et al.  Peak-to-average power ratio reduction of an OFDM signal using partial transmit sequences , 2000, IEEE Communications Letters.

[9]  Charalampos Tsimenidis,et al.  Selected mapping without side information for PAPR reduction in OFDM , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  GFDM - Generalized Frequency Division Multiplexing , 2009, VTC Spring 2009 - IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[11]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Five disruptive technology directions for 5G , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  Bin Tian,et al.  A Novel Hybrid CFO Estimation Scheme for UFMC-Based Systems , 2017, IEEE Communications Letters.

[13]  Woongsup Lee,et al.  A Novel PAPR Reduction Scheme for OFDM System Based on Deep Learning , 2018, IEEE Communications Letters.

[14]  Dimitri Ktenas,et al.  Waveform contenders for 5G: Description, analysis and comparison , 2017, Phys. Commun..

[15]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  High Resolution Carrier Frequency Offset Estimation in Time-Reversal Wideband Communications , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[16]  Thorsten Wild,et al.  Waveform contenders for 5G — OFDM vs. FBMC vs. UFMC , 2014, 2014 6th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing (ISCCSP).

[17]  Muhammad Ali Imran,et al.  Optimal Filter Length and Zero Padding Length Design for Universal Filtered Multi-Carrier (UFMC) System , 2019, IEEE Access.

[18]  Chao-Kai Wen,et al.  PAPR Reduction of OFDM Signals Using Cross-Entropy-Based Tone Injection Schemes , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[19]  Mohsen Kavehrad,et al.  Effects of time selective multipath fading on OFDM systems for broadband mobile applications , 1999, IEEE Communications Letters.

[20]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  5G: A Tutorial Overview of Standards, Trials, Challenges, Deployment, and Practice , 2017, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[21]  Liang Wu,et al.  An Advanced Receiver for Universal Filtered Multicarrier , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[22]  Frank Schaich,et al.  Waveform Contenders for 5G - Suitability for Short Packet and Low Latency Transmissions , 2014, 2014 IEEE 79th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[23]  Agrawal Mitalee,et al.  BER Analysis of MIMO OFDM System for AWGN & Rayleigh Fading Channel , 2011 .

[24]  Rahim Tafazolli,et al.  Multi-Service System: An Enabler of Flexible 5G Air Interface , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[25]  A. Lozano,et al.  What Will 5 G Be ? , 2014 .

[26]  D. Kténas,et al.  Waveform contenders for 5G: Description, analysis and comparison , 2017, Phys. Commun..

[27]  Tao Jiang,et al.  An Overview: Peak-to-Average Power Ratio Reduction Techniques for OFDM Signals , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[28]  Yue Xiao,et al.  Error Probability Analysis of OFDM-IM With Carrier Frequency Offset , 2016, IEEE Communications Letters.

[29]  Shin-Lin Shieh,et al.  5G New Radio: Waveform, Frame Structure, Multiple Access, and Initial Access , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[30]  R. Kalbasi,et al.  Single-carrier frequency domain equalization , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.