Comparison and Evaluation of the T-Lohi MAC for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks

This paper introduces T-Lohi, a new class of distributed and energy-efficient media-access protocols (MAC) for underwater acoustic sensor networks (UWSN). MAC design for UWSN faces significant challenges. For example, acoustic communication suffers from latencies five orders-of-magnitude larger than radio communication, so a naive CSMA MAC would require very long listen time resulting in low throughput and poor energy efficiency. In this paper, we first identify unique characteristics in underwater networking that may affect all MACs, such as space-time uncertainty and deafness conditions. We then develop T-Lohi employing a novel tone-based contention resolution mechanism that exploits space-time uncertainty and high latency to detect collisions and count contenders, achieving good throughput across all offered loads. T-Lohi exploits a low-power wake-up receiver to significantly reduce energy consumption. We evaluate design choices and protocol performance through extensive simulation. Finally, we compare T-Lohi against a few canonical MAC protocols. The results show that the energy cost of packet transmission is within 3-9% of optimal, and that Lohi achieves good channel utilization, within 30% utilization of the theoretical maximum. We also show that Lohi is stable and fair under both low and very high offered loads. Finally, we compare Lohi with other alternatives, including TDMA, CSMA, and ALOHA. Except for TDMA under heavy load, Lohi provides the best utilization in all cases, and it is always the most energy efficient.

[1]  J. Heidemann,et al.  Underwater Sensor Networking : Research Challenges and Potential Applications , 2006 .

[2]  V. Rodoplu,et al.  An energy-efficient MAC protocol for underwater wireless acoustic networks , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.

[3]  L. Kleinrock,et al.  Packet Switching in Radio Channels : Part Il-The Hidden Terminal Problem in Carrier Sense Multiple-Access and the Busy-Tone Solution , 2022 .

[4]  John S. Heidemann,et al.  T-Lohi: A New Class of MAC Protocols for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[5]  Jing Deng,et al.  Dual busy tone multiple access (DBTMA)-a multiple access control scheme for ad hoc networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[6]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  A MAC protocol for ad-hoc underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[7]  Prasant Mohapatra,et al.  Medium access control in wireless sensor networks , 2007, Comput. Networks.

[8]  John S. Heidemann,et al.  Time Synchronization for High Latency Acoustic Networks , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[9]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Optimization of a data link protocol for an underwater acoustic channel , 2005, Europe Oceans 2005.

[10]  John S. Heidemann,et al.  Low-power acoustic modem for dense underwater sensor networks , 2006, WUWNet '06.

[11]  H. Bigelow Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution , 1930, Nature.

[12]  Joseph Rice,et al.  Seaweb Acoustic Communication and Navigation Networks , 2005 .

[13]  Lijun Chen,et al.  Random Access Game and Medium Access Control Design , 2010, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[14]  Elizabeth M. Belding-Royer,et al.  Determining intra-flow contention along multihop paths in wireless networks , 2004, First International Conference on Broadband Networks.

[15]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Slotted FAMA: a MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks , 2006, OCEANS 2006 - Asia Pacific.

[16]  Hassan Peyravi,et al.  Medium access control protocols performance in satellite communications , 1999, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[17]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  Understanding spatio-temporal uncertainty in medium access with ALOHA protocols , 2007, Underwater Networks.

[18]  Geoffrey G. Xie,et al.  A Networking Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2000 .

[19]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor network , 2005, SenSys '05.

[20]  Jia Wang,et al.  Efficient and accurate Ethernet simulation , 1999, Proceedings 24th Conference on Local Computer Networks. LCN'99.

[21]  Vaduvur Bharghavan,et al.  MACAW: a media access protocol for wireless LAN's , 1994, SIGCOMM 1994.

[22]  Brian Neil Levine,et al.  A survey of practical issues in underwater networks , 2006, MOCO.