Facilitated Event-Related Power Modulations during Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Revealed by Concurrent tACS-MEG

Non-invasive approaches to modulate oscillatory activity in the brain receive growing popularity in the scientific community. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has been shown to modulate neural oscillations in a frequency specific manner. Due to a massive stimulation artifact at the targeted frequency, only little is known about effects of tACS during stimulation. I.e. it remains unclear how the continuous application of tACS affects event-related oscillations during cognitive tasks. Depending on whether tACS merely affects pre‐ or post-stimulus oscillations or both, stimulation can alter patterns of event-related oscillatory dynamics in various directions or may not affect them at all. Thus, knowledge about these directions is crucial to plan, predict and understand outcomes of solely behavioral tACS experiments. Here, a recently proposed procedure to suppress tACS artifacts by projecting MEG data into source space using spatial filtering was utilized to recover event-related power modulations in the alpha band during a mental rotation task. MEG of twenty-five volunteers was continuously recorded. After 10 minutes of baseline measurement, they received either 20 minutes of tACS at individual alpha frequency or sham stimulation. Another 40 minutes of MEG were acquired thereafter. Data were projected into source space and carefully examined for residual artifacts. Results revealed strong facilitation of event-related power modulations in the alpha band during tACS application. Data provide first direct evidence, that tACS does not counteract top-down suppression of intrinsic oscillations, but rather enhances pre-existent power modulations within the range of the individual alpha (=stimulation) frequency. Significance Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is increasingly used in cognitive neuroscience to study the causal role of brain oscillations and cognition. However, online effects of tACS so far largely remain a ‘black box’ due to an intense electromagnetic artifact encountered during stimulation. The current study is the first to employ a spatial filtering approach to recover and systematically study event-related oscillatory dynamics during tACS, which can potentially be altered in various directions. TACS facilitated pre-existing patterns of oscillatory dynamics during the employed mental rotation task, but does not counteract or overwrite them. In addition, control analysis and a measure to quantify tACS artifact suppression are provided that can enrich future studies investigating tACS online effects.

[1]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  Kohitij Kar,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Attenuates Neuronal Adaptation , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Christoph S. Herrmann,et al.  BOLD signal effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in the alpha range: A concurrent tACS–fMRI study , 2016, NeuroImage.

[4]  A. Antal,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates spontaneous low frequency fluctuations as measured with fMRI , 2016, NeuroImage.

[6]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Enhances Individual Alpha Activity in Human EEG , 2010, PloS one.

[7]  C. Gerloff,et al.  Enhancing cognitive performance with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at human individual alpha frequency , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  Roberta Sellaro,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2017 .

[9]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Sustained Aftereffect of α-tACS Lasts Up to 70 min after Stimulation , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[10]  C. Koch,et al.  Transcranial Electric Stimulation Entrains Cortical Neuronal Populations in Rats , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  F. Fröhlich,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Modulates Large-Scale Cortical Network Activity by Network Resonance , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  W. Klimesch,et al.  EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[13]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[14]  A. Engel,et al.  Entrainment of Brain Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2014, Current Biology.

[15]  E. Basar,et al.  Brain oscillations in perception and memory. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[16]  S. Taulu,et al.  Applications of the signal space separation method , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  Markus Siegel,et al.  Phase properties of transcranial electrical stimulation artifacts in electrophysiological recordings , 2017, NeuroImage.

[18]  Christoph S. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Enhances Mental Rotation Performance during and after Stimulation , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[19]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial electrical stimulation of the occipital cortex during visual perception modifies the magnitude of BOLD activity: A combined tES–fMRI approach , 2016, NeuroImage.

[20]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Ten Minutes of α-tACS and Ambient Illumination Independently Modulate EEG α-Power , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[21]  D. McCormick,et al.  Endogenous Electric Fields May Guide Neocortical Network Activity , 2010, Neuron.

[22]  B. Krekelberg,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Attenuates Visual Motion Adaptation , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Induction of self awareness in dreams through frontal low current stimulation of gamma activity , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Toralf Neuling,et al.  Faith and oscillations recovered: On analyzing EEG/MEG signals during tACS , 2017, NeuroImage.

[25]  F. Fregni,et al.  A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2011, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[26]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  J. Born,et al.  Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory , 2006, Nature.

[28]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[29]  Jukka Sarvas,et al.  Proceedings #17. A simple reason why beamformer may (not) remove the tACS-induced artifact in MEG , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[30]  M. Murray,et al.  Shaping Intrinsic Neural Oscillations with Periodic Stimulation , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Sarah Harrison,et al.  Eyes wide shut. , 2003, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[32]  C. Herrmann Human EEG responses to 1–100 Hz flicker: resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  G. Nolte The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Lasting EEG/MEG Aftereffects of Rhythmic Transcranial Brain Stimulation: Level of Control Over Oscillatory Network Activity , 2015, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[35]  Caroline Szymanski,et al.  Frequency-Unspecific Effects of θ-tACS Related to a Visuospatial Working Memory Task , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[36]  A. Pérez-Villalba Rhythms of the Brain, G. Buzsáki. Oxford University Press, Madison Avenue, New York (2006), Price: GB £42.00, p. 448, ISBN: 0-19-530106-4 , 2008 .

[37]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Effects of 10Hz and 20Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on motor functions and motor cortical excitability , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[38]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Eyes wide shut: Transcranial alternating current stimulation drives alpha rhythm in a state dependent manner , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Duration of EEG and MEG Suppression Increases with Angle in a Mental Rotation Task , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[41]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Alpha Power Increase After Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Alpha Frequency (α-tACS) Reflects Plastic Changes Rather Than Entrainment , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[42]  Juliann M. Mellin,et al.  Functional role of frontal alpha oscillations in creativity , 2015, Cortex.

[43]  Toralf Neuling,et al.  Friends, not foes: Magnetoencephalography as a tool to uncover brain dynamics during transcranial alternating current stimulation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[44]  Christoph Braun,et al.  Mapping entrained brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2016, NeuroImage.

[45]  H H Donaldson,et al.  LOCALIZATION IN THE BRAIN. , 1884, Science.

[46]  Robert Leech,et al.  Externally induced frontoparietal synchronization modulates network dynamics and enhances working memory performance , 2017, eLife.

[47]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[49]  G. Ganis,et al.  A New Set of Three-Dimensional Shapes for Investigating Mental Rotation Processes: Validation Data and Stimulus Set , 2015 .

[50]  L. Parra,et al.  Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation Affects Network Dynamics by Modulating Population Rate and Spike Timing , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  A. Engel,et al.  EEG oscillations: From correlation to causality. , 2016, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[52]  L. Cohen,et al.  In vivo assessment of human brain oscillations during application of transcranial electric currents , 2013, Nature Communications.

[53]  Joerg F. Hipp,et al.  Physiological processes non-linearly affect electrophysiological recordings during transcranial electric stimulation , 2016, NeuroImage.