Enhancing Design Research in the Context of Design Education

Research into design theory and methodology is central to postgraduate design education. It has been widely acknowledged in the literature that a key activity in ensuring the quality of research in the area of design theory and methodology is to put particular emphasis on addressing both technical and social aspects that underpin the socio-technical nature of design research. In addition, this is requisite in linking design theory to design practice. However, explicit research methodologies that take into consideration both of these aspects, as well as explicitly address the issue of linking design theory to design practice, are scarce. The overall aim of this paper is to increase the awareness of stakeholders involved in design research education (e.g., master and doctoral students, faculty, and education planners), of the need to safeguard and assure the credibility and validity of design research outputs. The paper reviews issues and challenges associated with the use of research methodologies in the context of design theory and methodology research. It reports findings from the development, application, and evaluation of a research methodology based on hypothesis testing, action research, and case study research methodologies. Application and evaluation of the methodology showed that the introduced concepts of basis-of-action and course-of-action proved key elements in establishing intellectual frameworks for design research. Conclusions are drawn on the effectiveness of the methodology to address issues and challenges associated with the nature of design research, and on pedagogical benefits that can be gained from its application in postgraduate design research education.

[1]  Walter Guido Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History by Walter G. Vincenti , 1992, Technology and Culture.

[2]  Donald A. Schön The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[3]  C. Argyris On organizational learning , 1993 .

[4]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  A Guide To Research For Educators And Trainers Of Adults , 1990 .

[5]  Shuang Song,et al.  IDENTIFYING SHARED UNDERSTANDING IN DESIGN USING DOCUMENT ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[6]  Ken Friedman,et al.  Creating design knowledge: from research into practice , 2000 .

[7]  Terence Love,et al.  Philosophy of design: a meta-theoretical structure for design theory , 2000 .

[8]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[9]  C. Mitcham,et al.  Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy by Carl Mitcham (review) , 1995, Technology and Culture.

[10]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests , 1972 .

[11]  John R. Dixon,et al.  On research methodology towards a scientific theory of engineering design , 1987, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[12]  Vassilis Agouridas,et al.  2.2.3 Combined Requirements Engineering (CRE): The quest for widening the applicability of requirements engineering practices in the emerging product‐service paradigm , 2007 .

[13]  K. Lewin Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[14]  Frank F. Land,et al.  Viewpoint: choosing appropriate information systems research methodologies , 1987, CACM.

[15]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Yoram Reich,et al.  The Study of Design Research Methodology , 1995 .

[17]  A. de Pennington,et al.  Using information structures to gain competitive advantage , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[18]  Vassilis Agouridas,et al.  Supporting Reflection Practice in Design Education , 2006 .

[19]  Per Galle,et al.  Philosophy of design: an editorial introduction , 2002 .

[20]  Frank Land,et al.  Choosing Appropriate Information Systems Research Methodologies , 2002 .

[21]  Karen E. Watkins,et al.  Action Research: Rethinking Lewin , 1999 .

[22]  N. Cross Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[23]  Vassilis Agouridas,et al.  Enhancing Knowledge Management in Design Education Through Systematic Reflection Practice , 2007, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[24]  S. Pizzocaro Learning design research: outlining a context Critical issues derived from the Politecnico di Milano Ph.D. research curricula in industrial design , 2004 .

[25]  A de Pennington,et al.  Early alignment of design requirements with stakeholder needs , 2006 .

[26]  Vasant Dhar,et al.  Supporting Systems Development by Capturing Deliberations During Requirements Engineering , 1992, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[27]  Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al.  Shared memory in design: A unifying theme for research and practice , 1992 .

[28]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Research methods in information systems , 1985 .

[29]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  An ethnographic perspective on engineering design , 1988 .

[30]  M. Manen Linking Ways of Knowing with Ways of Being Practical , 1977 .

[31]  I. Dey Grounding grounded theory : guidelines for qualitative inquiry , 1999 .

[32]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[33]  John R. Dixon,et al.  A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part I: Descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design processes , 1989 .

[34]  Olly Gotel,et al.  An analysis of the requirements traceability problem , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering.

[35]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Information, Systems, And Information Systems , 1997 .

[36]  Wolter J. Fabrycky,et al.  Systems engineering and analysis , 1981 .

[37]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[38]  John R. Dixon Recent Developments in Engineering Design Research , 1994 .

[39]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Risk Reduction of Jet Engine Product Development Using Technology Readiness Metrics , 2002 .

[40]  Alison McKay,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN DESIGN: AN APPLICATION OF AXIOMATIC DESIGN , 2002 .

[41]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  New Methodologies in Art and Design Research: The Object as Discourse , 1999 .

[42]  Bill Gillham,et al.  Case Study Research Methods , 2000 .

[43]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 1980 .

[44]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[45]  John R. Dixon,et al.  A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part II: Representations, analysis, and design for the life cycle , 1989 .

[46]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[47]  Erik K. Antonsson,et al.  Development and Testing of Hypotheses in Engineering Design Research , 1987 .

[48]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[49]  Paul T. Kidd,et al.  Agile Manufacturing: Forging New Frontiers , 1994 .

[50]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[51]  Loraine Blaxter,et al.  How to Research , 1996 .

[52]  J. Cunningham Action Research and Organizational Development , 1993 .

[53]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  Integrating case study and survey research methods: an example in information systems , 1994 .

[54]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications , 2001 .

[55]  Melvin Blumberg,et al.  How Control Groups Can Cause Loss of Control in Action Research: The Case of Rushton Coal Mine , 1983 .

[56]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[57]  Alison McKay,et al.  Establishing Stakeholder Needs for Medical Devices , 2006 .

[58]  Vassilis Agouridas,et al.  Methods and Tools for Requirements Engineering of Made-to-Order Mechanical Products , 2002 .

[59]  Alison McKay,et al.  11.2.1 Challenges in the application of systems engineering principles to the design of appealing consumer products , 2006 .

[60]  Daune West,et al.  Structuring Action and Reflection in Information Systems Action Research Studies Using Checkland's FMA Model , 2001 .

[61]  Vassilis Agouridas,et al.  3.3.1 Consumer product development: A systems engineering approach to the derivation of design requirements from stakeholder needs , 2004 .

[62]  Michael A. Rosenman,et al.  Purpose and function in design: from the socio-cultural to the techno-physical , 1998 .