Combined geophysical surveys for the characterization of a reconstructed river embankment

Abstract The managing and monitoring of natural and artificial river levees are crucial in order to reduce the hydrological risk. As these hydraulic structures are very extensive, the typically applied techniques (e.g. geotechnical soundings and visual inspections) provide only punctual information that are generally focused on areas already recognized as troublesome. To overcome these well-known issues, non-invasive and cost-effective geophysical measurements have been proposed (and used) to supply spatially extensive data that should be integrated with direct investigations. Therefore, in this paper we present the joint use of multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW), electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), and ground penetrating radar (GPR) to characterize a reconstructed river embankment (made of concrete and tout-venant) prone to serious leakages. We compare common lengthwise ERT profiles, performed from the levee crest, with cross-embankment and cross-river profiles, showing how relying only on the first type of surveys may lead to misinterpretations. Furthermore, we take advantage of a land-streamer for the MASW surveys and of a trans-illumination approach to improve the GPR application. The comparison between geophysical and geotechnical data helps identify the spatial extent of the volume actually invaded by grouting injections, which appears as a highly electrically conductive mean. The lack of homogeneity within this domain, highlighted by the cross-embankment ERT profiles, can be related to the seepage phenomena affecting this artificial levee. Therefore, this case study demonstrates the effectiveness of combining direct and non-invasive investigations for the characterization of river embankments.

[1]  N. T. Vu,et al.  Multi-electrode measurements at Thai Binh dikes (Vietnam) , 2003 .

[2]  Sebastiano Foti,et al.  Surface Wave Testing for Geotechnical Characterization , 2005 .

[3]  Richard D. Miller,et al.  Multichannel analysis of surface waves , 1999 .

[4]  E. Cardarelli,et al.  Characterization of an earth-filled dam through the combined use of electrical resistivity tomography, P- and SH-wave seismic tomography and surface wave data , 2014 .

[5]  Adam Szynkiewicz GPR monitoring of earthen flood banks/levees , 2000, International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[6]  H. Komine Evaluation of chemical grouted soil by electrical resistivity , 1997 .

[7]  Andreas Weller,et al.  The effect of dike geometry on different resistivity configurations , 2005 .

[8]  A. Binley,et al.  DC Resistivity and Induced Polarization Methods , 2005 .

[9]  G. Vignoli,et al.  The Influence of Subsoil Structure and Acquisition Parameters in MASW Mode Mis-identification , 2014 .

[10]  A. P. Annan GPR Methods for Hydrogeological Studies , 2005 .

[11]  A. Neville Properties of Concrete , 1968 .

[12]  W. R. Dearman,et al.  Assessment of grouting efficiency in a rock mass in terms of seismic velocities , 1987 .

[13]  George Stavrakakis,et al.  Geophysical methods contributing to the testing of concrete dams. Application at the Marathon Dam , 2002 .

[14]  C. Andrade,et al.  A new method forin-situ measurement of electrical resistivity of reinforced concrete , 1996 .

[15]  In-Ky Cho,et al.  Crossline resistivity tomography for the delineation of anomalous seepage pathways in an embankment dam , 2007 .

[16]  Time‐lapse seismic study of levees in southern Texas , 2005 .

[17]  J. Kaipio,et al.  Electrical Resistance Tomography Imaging of Concrete , 2010 .

[18]  P. Dietrich,et al.  Noninvasive Monitoring of Soil Static Characteristics and Dynamic States: A Case Study Highlighting Vegetation Effects on Agricultural Land , 2012 .

[19]  Alberto Villa,et al.  Calibration of a Vadose Zone Model Using Water Injection Monitored by GPR and Electrical Resistance Tomography , 2008 .

[20]  H. W. Whittington,et al.  The conduction of electricity through concrete , 1981 .

[21]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Electrical resistance tomography. , 2000 .

[22]  Attilio Castellarin,et al.  Application of GPR to the monitoring of river embankments , 2010 .

[23]  G. Cassiani,et al.  River embankment characterization: The joint use of geophysical and geotechnical techniques , 2014 .

[24]  Krishna R. Reddy,et al.  Geoenvironmental Engineering: Site Remediation, Waste Containment, and Emerging Waste Management Technologies , 2004 .

[25]  A. Fontana,et al.  Alluvial megafans in the Venetian-Friulian Plain (north-eastern Italy): Evidence of sedimentary and erosive phases during Late Pleistocene and Holocene , 2008 .

[26]  Richard D. Miller,et al.  Levee evaluation using MASW: Preliminary findings from the Citrus Lakefront Levee, New Orleans, Louisiana , 2008 .

[27]  Sam Johansson,et al.  Embankment dam seepage evaluation from resistivity monitoring data , 2009 .

[28]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[29]  M. Schevenels,et al.  Geotechnical characterization of a river dyke by surface waves surface waves , 2011 .

[30]  Seokhoon Oh Safety assessment of dams by analysis of the electrical properties of the embankment material , 2012 .

[31]  Michael Raupach,et al.  Test methods for on site measurement of resistivity of concrete , 2000 .

[32]  Laura Socco,et al.  Surface-wave method for near-surface characterization: a tutorial , 2004 .