Applying high frame-rate digital radiography and dual-energy distributed-sources for advanced tomosynthesis

Conventional radiography uses a single point x-ray source with a fan or cone beam to visualize various areas of the human body. An imager records the transmitted photons—historically film and now increasingly digital radiography (DR) flat panel detectors—followed by optional image post-processing. Some post-processing techniques of particular interest are tomosynthesis, and dual energy subtraction. Tomosynthesis adds the ability to recreate quasi-3D images from a series of 2D projections. These exposures are typically taken along an arc or other path; and, tomosynthesis reconstruction is used to form a three-dimensional representation of the area of interest. Dual-energy radiography adds the ability to enhance or “eliminate” structures based on their different attenuation of well-separated end-point energies in two exposures. These advanced capabilities come at a high cost in terms of complexity, imaging time, capital equipment, space, and potentially reduced image quality due to motion blur if acquired sequentially. Recently, the prospect of creating x-ray sources, which are composed of arrays of micro-emitters, has been put forward. These arrays offer a flat-panel geometry and may afford advantages in fabrication methodology, size and cost. They also facilitate the use of the dual energy technology. Here we examine the possibility of using such an array of x-ray sources combined with high frame-rate (~kHz) DR detectors to produce advanced medical images without the need for moving gantries or other complex motion systems. Combining the advantages of dual energy imaging with the ability to determine the relative depth location of anatomical structures or pathological findings from imaging procedures should prove to be a powerful diagnostic tool. We also present use cases that would benefit from the capabilities of this modality.

[1]  Natalie N. Braun,et al.  Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[2]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Long bone panoramas from fluoroscopic X-ray images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Otto Zhou,et al.  Stationary scanning x-ray source based on carbon nanotube field emitters , 2005 .

[4]  Hany Kashani,et al.  Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[5]  Mark R. Pickering,et al.  Novel algebraic reconstruction technique for faster and finer CT reconstruction , 2013, Other Conferences.

[6]  S. Ramaswami,et al.  Characterization of Pixel Response Time and Image Lag in CMOS Sensors , 2001 .

[7]  M. Karçaaltıncaba,et al.  Dual-energy CT revisited with multidetector CT: review of principles and clinical applications. , 2011, Diagnostic and interventional radiology.

[8]  J. Goo,et al.  Dual-energy CT: clinical applications in various pulmonary diseases. , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  R. Shack,et al.  History and principles of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing. , 2001, Journal of refractive surgery.

[10]  Kyung Soo Lee,et al.  Pulmonary mycobacterial disease: diagnostic performance of low-dose digital tomosynthesis as compared with chest radiography. , 2010, Radiology.

[11]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography: Image Reconstruction from Projections , 2009, Advances in Pattern Recognition.

[12]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Dual- and multi-energy CT: approach to functional imaging , 2011, Insights into imaging.

[13]  Peter B Sachs,et al.  Dual energy subtraction digital radiography: technical considerations, clinical applications, and imaging pitfalls. , 2006, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[14]  B. Trotman-Dickenson,et al.  Radiology in the Intensive Care Unit (Part I) , 2003, Journal of intensive care medicine.