Comparative antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan: comparison with other angiotensin II receptor antagonists

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Effective control of elevated blood pressure (BP) has been shown to reduce this risk. Early studies of risk reduction assumed that the mechanism by which BP was lowered had little impact on the benefit obtained. Recent evidence, however, suggests that agents that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system may be particularly beneficial. The results of the recent Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) trial suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have a greater impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality than would be anticipated from their antihypertensive effects alone. Angiotensin receptor blockers, the other major class of antihypertensive drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system, have not been widely tested in outcomes trials, but early results suggest that they are beneficial for controlling target organ damage that is related to hypertension. Furthermore, unlike ACE inhibitors, these agents have a side-effect profile that is similar to that of placebo. Based on their efficacy in controlling hypertension and their wider health benefits, together with minimal side effects, angiotensin II (A II) receptor blockers should be considered as first-line agents for the treatment of hypertension, particularly in patients with other cardiovascular risk factors. Preliminary evidence suggests that olmesartan, an A II receptor blocker currently being evaluated for approval for clinical use, may provide antihypertensive efficacy that is superior to other members of the class.

[1]  B. Dahlöf,et al.  Morbidity and mortality in the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension (STOP-Hypertension) , 1991, The Lancet.

[2]  J. Flack,et al.  Effects and tolerability of irbesartan versus enalapril in patients with severe hypertension. Irbesartan Multicenter Investigators. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  S. Oparil,et al.  An elective-titration study of the comparative effectiveness of two angiotensin II-receptor blockers, irbesartan and losartan. Irbesartan/Losartan Study Investigators. , 1998, Clinical therapeutics.

[4]  J. Staessen Treatment of isolated systolic hypertension , 1998 .

[5]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2000;342:145-53. , 2000 .

[6]  C. Ferrario,et al.  Inhibition of early atherogenesis by losartan in monkeys with diet-induced hypercholesterolemia. , 2000, Circulation.

[7]  C. Held,et al.  Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in human hypertension with irbesartan , 2001, Journal of hypertension.

[8]  H. Koike,et al.  New pharmacologic aspects of CS-866, the newest angiotensin II receptor antagonist. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  E. J. Brown,et al.  Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  S. Oparil,et al.  A comparison of the angiotensin II antagonists valsartan and losartan in the treatment of essential hypertension. , 1999, American journal of hypertension.

[11]  M. Burnier,et al.  Angiotensin II receptor antagonists , 2000, The Lancet.

[12]  Y. Lacourciére,et al.  A comparison of the efficacies and duration of action of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan and amlodipine. , 1998, Blood pressure monitoring.

[13]  G. Bakris,et al.  Preserving renal function in adults with hypertension and diabetes: a consensus approach. National Kidney Foundation Hypertension and Diabetes Executive Committees Working Group. , 2000, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[14]  Y. Lacourciére,et al.  The antihypertensive efficacy of losartan and amlodipine assessed with office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Canadian Cozaar Hyzaar Amlodipine Trial Study Group. , 1998, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[15]  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group. , 1991, JAMA.

[16]  E. Schiffrin,et al.  System Journal of Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone Journal of Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone System Essential Hypertension Reduction of Resistance Artery Stiffness by Treatment with the At1-receptor Antagonist Losartan in Journal of Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone System Additional Services and Informatio , 2022 .

[17]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  P. Thürmann,et al.  Influence of the angiotensin II antagonist valsartan on left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with essential hypertension. , 1998, Circulation.

[19]  L. Ruilope,et al.  Renoprotection and renin-angiotensin system blockade in diabetes mellitus. , 1997, American journal of hypertension.

[20]  W. Kannel,et al.  Fifty years of Framingham Study contributions to understanding hypertension , 2000, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[21]  D. Henry,et al.  Valsartan, a New Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist: A Double‐Blind Study Comparing the Incidence of Cough with Lisinopril and Hydrochlorothiazide , 1997, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[22]  G. Bakris,et al.  SPECIAL REPORT Preserving Renal Function in Adults With Hypertension and Diabetes: A Consensus Approach , 2000 .

[23]  L. Passman,et al.  The treatment of mild hypertension study. , 1993, JAMA.

[24]  J. Neaton,et al.  Blood pressure, systolic and diastolic, and cardiovascular risks. US population data. , 1993, Archives of internal medicine.

[25]  F. Leenen,et al.  Patterns of compliance with once versus twice daily antihypertensive drug therapy in primary care: a randomized clinical trial using electronic monitoring. , 1997, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[26]  E. Schiffrin,et al.  Correction of arterial structure and endothelial dysfunction in human essential hypertension by the angiotensin receptor antagonist losartan. , 2000, Circulation.

[27]  G. Hitzenberger,et al.  Use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to compare antihypertensive efficacy and safety of two angiotensin II receptor antagonists, losartan and valsartan , 2000, Advances in therapy.

[28]  ECiM 6BQ,et al.  Medical Research Council trial of treatment of hypertension in older adults: principal results. MRC Working Party. , 1992, BMJ.

[29]  R. Asmar,et al.  A comparison of the efficacy and duration of action of candesartan cilexetil and losartan as assessed by clinic and ambulatory blood pressure after a missed dose, in truly hypertensive patients: a placebo-controlled, forced titration study. Candesartan/Losartan study investigators. , 1999, American journal of hypertension.

[30]  W. Elliott Double-blind comparison of eprosartan and enalapril on cough and blood pressure in unselected hypertensive patients , 1999, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[31]  R. Fogari,et al.  Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: A comparative study of the efficacy and safety against amlodipine , 1996, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[32]  R. Asmar,et al.  A comparison of the efficacy and duration of action of candesartan cilexetil and losartan as assessed by clinic and ambulatory blood pressure after a missed dose, in truly hypertensive patients: a placebo-controlled, forced titration study. Candesartan/Losartan study investigators. , 1999, American journal of hypertension.

[33]  J. Flack,et al.  Effects and Tolerability of Irbesartan Versus Enalapril in Patients With Severe Hypertension fn1 , 1997 .

[34]  T. Bunt An elective-titration study of the comparative effectiveness of two angiotensin II-receptor blockers, irbesartan and losartan. , 1999, Clinical therapeutics.

[35]  Jan A Staessen,et al.  Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension , 1997, The Lancet.

[36]  R. Weinshilboum,et al.  The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[37]  J. Mehta,et al.  Oxidized LDL Upregulates Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Expression in Cultured Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells: The Potential Role of Transcription Factor NF-&kgr;B , 2000, Circulation.

[38]  E. Michelson,et al.  Comparative effects of candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine in patients with mild systemic hypertension. Comparison of Candesartan and Amlodipine for Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy (CASTLE) Study Investigators. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[39]  S G Chrysant,et al.  Comparative Efficacy of Olmesartan, Losartan, Valsartan, and Irbesartan in the Control of Essential Hypertension , 2001, Journal of clinical hypertension.

[40]  W. Kannel Blood pressure as a cardiovascular risk factor: prevention and treatment. , 1996, JAMA.

[41]  A. Levey,et al.  Achievement and safety of a low blood pressure goal in chronic renal disease. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. , 1997, Hypertension.

[42]  Ward Hj,et al.  Inadequate management of blood pressure in a hypertensive population. , 1999 .

[43]  R. Collins,et al.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease Part 2, short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context , 1990, The Lancet.

[44]  R. Collins,et al.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias , 1990, The Lancet.

[45]  R. Cífková,et al.  A randomized, double-blind comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of once-daily losartan compared to twice-daily captopril in mild to moderate essential hypertension. , 1997, Acta cardiologica.

[46]  J. S. Cohen,et al.  Adverse drug effects, compliance, and initial doses of antihypertensive drugs recommended by the Joint National Committee vs the Physicians' Desk Reference. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[47]  G. Limongelli,et al.  Effects of losartan on hypertension and left ventricular mass: a long-term study , 1998, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[48]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. , 2000 .

[49]  D J Reda,et al.  Single-Drug Therapy for Hypertension in Men -- A Comparison of Six Antihypertensive Agents with Placebo , 1993 .

[50]  Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  R. Holman,et al.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. , 1998 .

[52]  B. Davis,et al.  Effect of treating isolated systolic hypertension on the risk of developing various types and subtypes of stroke: the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). , 2000, JAMA.

[53]  T. Kahan,et al.  Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockade in hypertensive women: benefits of candesartan cilexetil versus enalapril or hydrochlorothiazide. , 2000, American journal of hypertension.

[54]  Kannel Wb,et al.  Fifty years of Framingham Study contributions to understanding hypertension. , 2000 .