Optimized maximum voluntary exertion protocol for normalizing shoulder muscle activity

Abstract Muscle activity is typically normalized to maximal activation from isometric maximum voluntary exertions (MVE) in posture and direction specific exertions for each muscle. This is challenging for the shoulder complex due to the large number of muscles. The objective of this investigation was to compare maximum shoulder muscle activity elicited from a multi-muscle MVE test protocol versus individual muscle MVE tests and determine their reliability. Ten healthy males had muscle activity recorded from 12 trunk and upper extremity muscles while performing 3 repetitions of 12 individual and 4 multi-muscle MVEs. Peak surface EMG (sEMG) amplitudes were compared using paired sample t-tests between the two protocols for each muscle. Individual muscle test maximum sEMG amplitudes differed significantly from the multi-muscle test protocol in 3 of 12 muscles (p < 0.05). In muscles that did not attain statistical significance, maximum amplitude differences of 6–15% were found. There was high reliability (Interclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC = 0.831–0.986) and no significant differences between the second and third repetitions of the protocol. Since differences of 6–15% could have functional significance, 8 MVE tests (3 multi-muscle, 5 individual muscle) were selected for future use. Using two repetitions of the reduced MVE protocol will reduce time, risk of pain and injury during experiments.

[1]  Tommy Öberg,et al.  Electromyogram mean power frequency in non-fatigued trapezius muscle , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[2]  S. Fischer,et al.  Effect of bilateral versus unilateral exertion tests on maximum voluntary activity and within-participant reproducibility in the shoulder. , 2011, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[3]  Clark R Dickerson,et al.  On the suitability of using surface electrode placements to estimate muscle activity of the rotator cuff as recorded by intramuscular electrodes. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[4]  J. F. Yang,et al.  Electromyography reliability in maximal and submaximal isometric contractions. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  G M Hägg,et al.  Normalization of surface EMG amplitude from the upper trapezius muscle in ergonomic studies - A review. , 1995, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[6]  R Kadefors,et al.  Subjective and objective evaluation of shoulder muscle fatigue. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[7]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[8]  Mark Halaki,et al.  Shoulder Muscle Recruitment Patterns During Commonly Used Rotator Cuff Exercises: An Electromyographic Study , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[9]  Peter J Keir,et al.  Obtaining maximum muscle excitation for normalizing shoulder electromyography in dynamic contractions. , 2013, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[10]  I. Cathers,et al.  Standard maximum isometric voluntary contraction tests for normalizing shoulder muscle EMG , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  S. Mathiassen,et al.  Normalizing upper trapezius EMG amplitude: Comparison of different procedures. , 1995, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[12]  B. Jonsson Kinesiology: with special reference to electromyographic kinesiology. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[13]  Clark R Dickerson,et al.  On the feasibility of obtaining multiple muscular maximal voluntary excitation levels from test exertions: a shoulder example. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[14]  E. Viikari-Juntura,et al.  Normalization of electromyogram in the neck-shoulder region , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[15]  Isabelle Rogowski,et al.  Reliability of EMG normalisation methods for upper-limb muscles , 2013, Journal of sports sciences.

[16]  Peter J Keir,et al.  Effects of posture, movement and hand load on shoulder muscle activity. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[17]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[18]  D. Kirkendall,et al.  Optimal normalization tests for shoulder muscle activation: An electromyographic study , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  G. L. Soderberg,et al.  Normalization procedures using maximum voluntary isometric contractions for the serratus anterior and trapezius muscles during surface EMG analysis. , 2005, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[20]  K. B. Veiersted The reproducibility of test contractions for calibration of electromyographic measurements , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.