The Sudbury Structure' Controversial or Misunderstood?

The origins of the Sudbury Structure and associated Igneous Complex have been controversial. Most models call for a major impact event followed by impact-induced igneous activity, although totally igneous models are still being proposed. Much of the controversy is due, in our opinion, to a misunderstanding of the size of the original Sudbury Structure. By analogy with other terrestrial impact structures, the spatial distribution of shock features and Huronian cover rocks at the Sudbury Structure suggest that the transient cavity was ∼100 km in diameter, which places the original final structural rim diameter in the range of 150–200 km. Theoretical calculations and empirical relationships indicate that the formation of an impact structure of this size will result in ∼104 km3 of impact melt, more than sufficient to produce a melt body the size of the Igneous Complex (present volume 4–8 × 103 km3). For the Igneous Complex to be an impact melt sheet it must have a composition similar to that of the target rocks. Evidence for this has been presented previously for Sr and Nd isotopic data, which suggest a crustal origin. Here, we also present new evidence from least squares mixing models that the average composition of the Igneous Complex corresponds to a mix of Archean granite-greenstone terrain, with possibly a small component of Huronian cover rocks. This is a geologically reasonable mix, based on the interpreted target rock geology and the geometry of melt formation in an impact event of this size. The Igneous Complex is differentiated, which is not a characteristic of previously studied terrestrial impact melt sheets. This can be ascribed, however, to its great thickness and slower cooling. That large impact melt sheets can differentiate has important implications for how the lunar samples and the early geologic history of the lunar highlands are interpreted. If this working hypothesis is accepted, namely, that both the Sudbury Structure and the Igneous Complex are impact in origin, then previous hybrid impact-igneous hypotheses can be discarded and the Sudbury Structure can be studied specifically for the constraints it provides to large-scale cratering and the formation of basin-sized (multiring?) impact structures.

[1]  V. Müller-Mohr Breccias in the basement of a deeply eroded impact Structure, Sudbury, Canada , 1992 .

[2]  F. Langenhorst,et al.  On the significance of crater ages : new ages for Dellen (Sweden) and Araguainha (Brazil) , 1992 .

[3]  M. Avermann,et al.  The Onaping Formation of the Sudbury Structure (Canada): an example of allochthonous impact breccias , 1992 .

[4]  Lauri J. Pesonen,et al.  The terrestrial impact cratering record , 1992 .

[5]  J. D. Fassett,et al.  Re-Os isotope systematics of Ni-Cu sulfide ores, Sudbury Igneous Complex, Ontario: evidence for a major crustal component , 1991 .

[6]  W. M. Schwerdtner,et al.  Structural analysis of the central and southwestern Sudbury Structure, Southern Province, Canadian Shield , 1991 .

[7]  R. Grieve,et al.  Shocked minerals and the K/T controversy , 1990 .

[8]  R. Lakomy Implications for cratering mechanics from a study of the Footwall Breccia of the Sudbury impact structure, Canada , 1990 .

[9]  R. Grieve,et al.  Geochemistry of the melt and country rocks of the Lake St. Martin impact structure, Manitoba, Canada , 1990 .

[10]  B. French 25 years of the impact-volcanic controversy: Is there anything new under the Sun or inside the Earth? , 1990 .

[11]  G. Ryder Lunar samples, lunar accretion and the early bombardment of the Moon , 1990 .

[12]  A. M. Killick Pseudotachylite generated as a result of a drilling “burn-in” , 1990 .

[13]  B. Dressler Shock metamorphic features and their zoning and orientation in the Precambrian rocks of the Manicouagan Structure, Quebec, Canada , 1990 .

[14]  C. Koeberl,et al.  Fission Track Evidence for Multiple Source Components of Zhamanshin Impactites, and New Fission Track Ages , 1989 .

[15]  W. Reimold,et al.  The HMX mixing calculation program , 1989 .

[16]  A. Deutsch,et al.  Strontium- and neodymium-isotopic characteristics of a heterolithic breccia in the basement of the Sudbury impact structure, Canada , 1989 .

[17]  K. Mccartney,et al.  Shocked quartz found at the K/T boundary , 1988 .

[18]  D. Stöffler,et al.  The Allochthonous Polymict Breccia Layer of the Haughton Impact Crater, Devon Island, Canada , 1988 .

[19]  R. Grieve The Haughton Impact Structure: Summary and Synthesis of the Results of the HISS Project* , 1988 .

[20]  D. Stöffler,et al.  Structural Deformation, Breccia Formation, and Shock Metamorphism in the Basement of Complex Terrestrial Impact Craters: Implications for the Cratering Process , 1988 .

[21]  D. Stöffler,et al.  Rb-Sr-analyses of Apollo 16 melt rocks and a new age estimate for the Imbrium basin: Lunar basin chronology and the early heavy bombardment of the moon , 1987 .

[22]  R. Grieve,et al.  Terrestrial Impact Structures , 1987 .

[23]  B. Dressler,et al.  The Sudbury Structure, Ontario, Canada — A Review , 1987 .

[24]  H. Melosh Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process , 1986 .

[25]  A. Basu,et al.  Origin of the Sudbury Complex by Meteoritic Impact: Neodymium Isotopic Evidence , 1985, Science.

[26]  C. Officer,et al.  Terminal Cretaceous Environmental Events , 1985, Science.

[27]  S. Croft Scaling of Complex Craters , 1985 .

[28]  H. Schwarcz,et al.  Oxygen isotopic and chemical compositions of rocks of the Sudbury Basin, Ontario , 1984 .

[29]  A. J. Naldrett,et al.  The Geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury structure , 1984 .

[30]  J. Head,et al.  The Manicouagan Impact Structure: An analysis of its original dimensions and form , 1983 .

[31]  W. Reimold The Lappajärvi meteorite crater, Finland: petrography, Rb-Sr, major and trace element geochemistry of the impact melt and basement rocks , 1982 .

[32]  S. Croft The Modification Stage of Basin Formation: Conditions of Ring Formation , 1981 .

[33]  R. Grieve,et al.  Constraints on the formation of ring impact structures, based on terrestrial data , 1981 .

[34]  S. Kieffer,et al.  The role of volatiles and lithology in the impact cratering process. , 1980 .

[35]  W. Hartmann Dropping stones in magma oceans - Effects of early lunar cratering , 1980 .

[36]  A. J. Naldrett Partitioning of Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu between sulfide liquid and basaltic melts and the composition of Ni-Cu sulfide deposits; reply and further discussion , 1979 .

[37]  E. Pattison The Sudbury sublayer , 1979 .

[38]  J. Crocket,et al.  Rare earth elements in the Sudbury Nickel Irruptive; comparison with layered gabbros and implications for nickel irruptive petrogenesis , 1979 .

[39]  T. Ahrens,et al.  Impact melting early in lunar history , 1979 .

[40]  D. Uhlmann,et al.  The thermal history of the Manicouagan Impact Melt Sheet, Quebec , 1978 .

[41]  R. J. Floran,et al.  Manicouagan Impact Melt, Quebec, 1, Stratigraphy, petrology, and chemistry , 1978 .

[42]  R. J. Floran,et al.  Manicouagan Impact Melt, Quebec 2. Chemical interrelations with basement and formational processes , 1978 .

[43]  R. J. Floran,et al.  Rb-Sr isochron age of the Manicouagan Melt Sheet, Quebec, Canada , 1978 .

[44]  C. Simonds,et al.  West Clearwater, Quebec impact structure, Part I: Field geology, structure and bulk chemistry. , 1978 .

[45]  C. Simonds,et al.  West Clearwater, Quebec impact structure. I - Field geology, structure and bulk chemistry. II - Petrology , 1978 .

[46]  D. J. Milton Shatter cones - An outstanding problem in shock mechanics , 1977 .

[47]  R. Hurst,et al.  Geochronologic investigations of the Sudbury Nickel Irruptive and the Superior Province granites north of Sudbury , 1977 .

[48]  R. Grieve,et al.  Cratering processes: as interpreted from the occurrence of impact melts. , 1977 .

[49]  C. Simonds,et al.  Dynamical implications of the petrology and distribution of impact melt rocks , 1977 .

[50]  D. Roddy,et al.  Shatter cones formed in large-scale experimental explosion craters , 1977 .

[51]  James W. Head,et al.  Comparison of impact basins on Mercury, Mars and the moon , 1976 .

[52]  R. Grieve Petrology and chemistry of the impact melt at Mistastin Lake crater, Labrador , 1975 .

[53]  P. Robertson Zones of shock metamorphism at the Charlevoix impact structure, Quebec , 1975 .

[54]  R. McNutt,et al.  The Age of the Sudbury Nickel Irruptive and the Murray Granite , 1975 .

[55]  K. Currie Geology and petrology of the Manicouagan Resurgent Caldera, Quebec , 1972 .

[56]  T. L. Wright,et al.  A Linear Programming and Least Squares Computer Method for Solving Petrologic Mixing Problems , 1970 .

[57]  B. French Possible relations between meteorite impact and igneous petrogenesis, as indicated by the Sudbury structure, Ontario, Canada , 1970 .

[58]  A. M. Goodwin Archean protocontinental growth and early crustal history of the Canadian Shield , 1968 .

[59]  B. French Sudbury Structure, Ontario: Some Petrographic Evidence for Origin by Meteorite Impact , 1967, Science.

[60]  R. Dietz Sudbury Structure as an Astrobleme , 1964, The Journal of Geology.

[61]  J. Stevenson THE UPPER CONTACT PHASE OF THE SUDBURY MICROPEGMATITE , 1963 .

[62]  E. R. Rose Manicouagan lake-mushalagan lake area, Quebec , 1955 .

[63]  C. Fenner Life-History of the Sudbury Nickel Irruptive , 1935, Geological Magazine.