A secure cloud-edges computing architecture for metagenomics analysis

Abstract Portable sequencing machines, such as the Oxford Nanopore MinION, are making the genome sequencing ubiquitous. Consequently, metagenomic studies are becoming increasingly popular, yielding important insights into microbial communities covering diverse environments from terrestrial to aquatic ecosystems. Furthermore, the adoption of low-power IoT computing devices represents a feasible way of distributing and managing those machines on the field. However, a key issue is represented by the huge amount of data produced during operations, whose management is actually challenging considering the resources required for an efficient data transfer and processing. In order to deal with such a challenge, this paper put forward a novel architecture based on the coupling of Edge and Cloud computing paradigms. The focus of the paper is the Edge layer, responsible for the dynamic management of the full analysis pipeline of IoT devices producing large datasets like the MinION ones while adopting proper security mechanisms that handle the authentication of on-field devices and the confidentiality of the transmitted data.

[1]  Lida Xu,et al.  An Integrated System for Regional Environmental Monitoring and Management Based on Internet of Things , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[2]  Jingfa Xiao,et al.  Bioinformatics clouds for big data manipulation , 2012, Biology Direct.

[3]  Mahmoud Al-Ayyoub,et al.  The future of mobile cloud computing: Integrating cloudlets and Mobile Edge Computing , 2016, 2016 23rd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT).

[4]  Mathias C. Walter,et al.  MinION as part of a biomedical rapidly deployable laboratory. , 2017, Journal of biotechnology.

[5]  Derrick E. Wood,et al.  Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments , 2014, Genome Biology.

[6]  Naixue Xiong,et al.  Post-cloud computing paradigms: a survey and comparison , 2017 .

[7]  Ivan Merelli,et al.  Low-power portable devices for metagenomics analysis: Fog computing makes bioinformatics ready for the Internet of Things , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[8]  Anton Y Peleg,et al.  Hospital-acquired infections due to gram-negative bacteria. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Partha Pratim Ray A survey on Internet of Things architectures , 2018, J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Chunlei Du,et al.  Nanopore-based Fourth-generation DNA Sequencing Technology , 2015, Genom. Proteom. Bioinform..

[11]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Fog Computing: Helping the Internet of Things Realize Its Potential , 2016, Computer.

[12]  Ivan Merelli,et al.  Managing, Analysing, and Integrating Big Data in Medical Bioinformatics: Open Problems and Future Perspectives , 2014, BioMed research international.

[13]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Internet of Things for Smart Cities , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[14]  T Laver,et al.  Assessing the performance of the Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION , 2015, Biomolecular detection and quantification.

[15]  Tarik Taleb,et al.  UAV-Based IoT Platform: A Crowd Surveillance Use Case , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Yacine Challal,et al.  A roadmap for security challenges in the Internet of Things , 2017, Digit. Commun. Networks.

[17]  R. Franklin,et al.  MinION TM nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach , 2017 .

[18]  Dick de Ridder,et al.  A sequencer coming of age: de novo genome assembly using MinION reads , 2017, bioRxiv.

[19]  Andrea Berton,et al.  IEEE 802.15.4 Air-Ground UAV Communications in Smart Farming Scenarios , 2018, IEEE Communications Letters.

[20]  Alessio Merlo,et al.  Measuring and estimating power consumption in Android to support energy-based intrusion detection , 2015, J. Comput. Secur..

[21]  Sadouanouan MALO,et al.  Low cost IoT solutions for agricultures fish farmers in Afirca:a case study from Burkina Faso , 2018, 2018 1st International Conference on Smart Cities and Communities (SCCIC).

[22]  Arwyn Edwards,et al.  Extreme metagenomics using nanopore DNA sequencing : a field report from Svalbard , 78 ° N , 2016 .

[23]  Sateesh Addepalli,et al.  Fog computing and its role in the internet of things , 2012, MCC '12.

[24]  Douglas J. Botkin,et al.  Nanopore DNA Sequencing and Genome Assembly on the International Space Station , 2016 .

[25]  Abdur Rahim,et al.  WAZIUP: A Low-Cost Infrastructure for Deploying IoT in Developing Countries , 2016, AFRICOMM.

[26]  Valery V. Korotaev,et al.  A Reference Model for Internet of Things Middleware , 2018, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[27]  Siobhán Clarke,et al.  Middleware for Internet of Things: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[28]  Xinyu Yang,et al.  A Survey on the Edge Computing for the Internet of Things , 2018, IEEE Access.

[29]  Alessandro Armando,et al.  Securing the "Bring Your Own Device" Paradigm , 2014, Computer.

[30]  Andrea Clematis,et al.  SoC-based computing infrastructures for scientific applications and commercial services: Performance and economic evaluations , 2019, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[31]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  Towards fog-driven IoT eHealth: Promises and challenges of IoT in medicine and healthcare , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[32]  O. Barbosa,et al.  Metagenomic analysis exploring taxonomic and functional diversity of soil microbial communities in Chilean vineyards and surrounding native forests , 2017, PeerJ.

[33]  A. Di Guardo,et al.  A new methodology to identify surface water bodies at risk by using pesticide monitoring data: The glyphosate case study in Lombardy Region (Italy). , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  Dan Schonfeld,et al.  Real-time wireless multisensory smart surveillance with 3D-HEVC streams for internet-of-things (IoT) , 2017, The Journal of Supercomputing.

[35]  José Luis Vázquez-Poletti,et al.  A performance/cost model for a CUDA drug discovery application on physical and public cloud infrastructures , 2014, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[36]  Angela M Yu,et al.  Nanopore sequencing in microgravity , 2015, npj Microgravity.

[37]  Prem Prakash Jayaraman,et al.  OpenIoT: Open Source Internet-of-Things in the Cloud , 2014, OpenIoT@SoftCOM.

[38]  Ynte H. Schukken,et al.  Longitudinal metagenomic profiling of bovine milk to assess the impact of intramammary treatment using a third-generation cephalosporin , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Prem Prakash Jayaraman,et al.  Data Ingestion and Storage Performance of IoT Platforms: Study of OpenIoT , 2016, InterOSS@IoT.

[40]  Enis Afgan,et al.  Using Cloud Computing Infrastructure with CloudBioLinux, CloudMan, and Galaxy , 2012, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[41]  Pier Stanislao Paolucci,et al.  Power-Efficient Computing: Experiences from the COSA Project , 2017, Sci. Program..

[42]  Michael Klompas,et al.  Acinetobacter baumannii: An Emerging and Important Pathogen. , 2010, Journal of clinical outcomes management : JCOM.

[43]  Xiaoping Ma,et al.  Performance evaluation of MQTT and CoAP via a common middleware , 2014, 2014 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP).

[44]  Ibrar Yaqoob,et al.  Big IoT Data Analytics: Architecture, Opportunities, and Open Research Challenges , 2017, IEEE Access.

[45]  Vladimir Vujovic,et al.  Internet of Things Based E-health Systems: Ideas, Expectations and Concerns , 2017, Handbook of Large-Scale Distributed Computing in Smart Healthcare.

[46]  R. Daniel The metagenomics of soil , 2005, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[47]  Ivan Beschastnikh,et al.  SPRUCE: A System for Supporting Urgent High-Performance Computing , 2006, Grid-Based Problem Solving Environments.

[48]  Ivan Merelli,et al.  Combining Edge and Cloud computing for low-power, cost-effective metagenomics analysis , 2019, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[49]  Andrea Clematis,et al.  Cloud Infrastructures for In Silico Drug Discovery: Economic and Practical Aspects , 2013, BioMed research international.

[50]  Matthew B. Kerby,et al.  Landscape of next-generation sequencing technologies. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[51]  Alessandro Armando,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the Android Security Framework , 2013, SEC.

[52]  Tie Qiu,et al.  Fog Computing Based Face Identification and Resolution Scheme in Internet of Things , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[53]  Nitin Naik,et al.  Choice of effective messaging protocols for IoT systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE).

[54]  Benedict Paten,et al.  Improved data analysis for the MinION nanopore sequencer , 2015, Nature Methods.

[55]  Jackson Phiri,et al.  A Remote Sensor Network using Android Things and Cloud Computing for the Food Reserve Agency in Zambia , 2017 .

[56]  Tomáš Vinař,et al.  DeepNano: Deep recurrent neural networks for base calling in MinION nanopore reads , 2016, PloS one.

[57]  Jean Pierre Nshimyimana,et al.  Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for assessment of microbial water quality: current progress, challenges, and future opportunities , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[58]  Liang Tong,et al.  A hierarchical edge cloud architecture for mobile computing , 2016, IEEE INFOCOM 2016 - The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[59]  Konstantinos Krampis,et al.  Cloud BioLinux: pre-configured and on-demand bioinformatics computing for the genomics community , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[60]  Hugh E. Olsen,et al.  The Oxford Nanopore MinION: delivery of nanopore sequencing to the genomics community , 2016, Genome Biology.