The active FMR1 promoter is associated with a large domain of altered chromatin conformation with embedded local histone modifications

We have analyzed the effects of gene activation on chromatin conformation throughout an ≈170-kb region comprising the human fragile X locus, which includes a single expressed gene, FMR1 (fragile X mental retardation 1). We have applied three approaches: (i) chromosome conformation capture, which assesses relative interaction frequencies of chromatin segments; (ii) an extension of this approach that identifies domains whose conformation differs from the average, which we developed and named chromosome conformation profiling; and (iii) ChIP analysis of histone modifications. We find that, in normal cells where FMR1 is active, the FMR1 promoter is at the center of a large (≈50 kb) domain of reduced intersegment interactions. In contrast, in fragile X cells where FMR1 is inactive, chromatin conformation is uniform across the entire region. We also find that histone modifications that are characteristic of active genes occur tightly localized around the FMR1 promoter in normal cells and are absent in fragile X cells. Therefore, the expression-correlated change in conformation affects a significantly larger domain than that marked by histone modifications. Domain-wide changes in interaction probability could reflect increased chromatin expansion and may also be related to an altered spatial disposition that results in increased intermingling with unrelated loci. The described approaches are widely applicable to the study of conformational changes of any locus of interest.

[1]  A. Pombo,et al.  Intermingling of Chromosome Territories in Interphase Suggests Role in Translocations and Transcription-Dependent Associations , 2006, PLoS biology.

[2]  M. Pazin,et al.  Histone H4-K16 Acetylation Controls Chromatin Structure and Protein Interactions , 2006, Science.

[3]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[4]  Keji Zhao,et al.  Active chromatin domains are defined by acetylation islands revealed by genome-wide mapping. , 2005, Genes & development.

[5]  M. Groudine,et al.  Proximity among distant regulatory elements at the beta-globin locus requires GATA-1 and FOG-1. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[6]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Genomic Maps and Comparative Analysis of Histone Modifications in Human and Mouse , 2005, Cell.

[7]  B. Oostra,et al.  Molecular dissection of the events leading to inactivation of the FMR1 gene. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[8]  Job Dekker,et al.  The three 'C' s of chromosome conformation capture: controls, controls, controls , 2005, Nature Methods.

[9]  J. Stamatoyannopoulos,et al.  Discovery of functional noncoding elements by digital analysis of chromatin structure. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Richard A Flavell,et al.  Long-range intrachromosomal interactions in the T helper type 2 cytokine locus , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[11]  Wolf Reik,et al.  Interaction between differentially methylated regions partitions the imprinted genes Igf2 and H19 into parent-specific chromatin loops , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[12]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon induction of transcription. , 2004, Genes & development.

[13]  F. Grosveld,et al.  3C technology: analyzing the spatial organization of genomic loci in vivo. , 2004, Methods in enzymology.

[14]  M. Groudine,et al.  A Complex Chromatin Landscape Revealed by Patterns of Nuclease Sensitivity and Histone Modification within the Mouse β-Globin Locus , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[15]  J. Dekker A closer look at long-range chromosomal interactions. , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[16]  T. Richmond,et al.  Chromatin fiber folding: requirement for the histone H4 N-terminal tail. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Erik Splinter,et al.  Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[18]  Cameron S. Osborne,et al.  Long-range chromatin regulatory interactions in vivo , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[19]  S. Ceman,et al.  Histone modifications depict an aberrantly heterochromatinized FMR1 gene in fragile x syndrome. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  J. Dekker,et al.  Capturing Chromosome Conformation , 2002, Science.

[21]  Stephen T Warren,et al.  A decade of molecular studies of fragile X syndrome. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  K Rippe,et al.  Making contacts on a nucleic acid polymer. , 2001, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[23]  James G. McNally,et al.  Large-scale chromatin decondensation and recondensation regulated by transcription from a natural promoter , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  J. Ragoussis,et al.  Large-scale chromatin organization of the major histocompatibility complex and other regions of human chromosome 6 and its response to interferon in interphase nuclei. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[25]  D. Nelson,et al.  (Over)correction of FMR1 deficiency with YAC transgenics: behavioral and physical features. , 2000, Human molecular genetics.

[26]  P. Jin,et al.  Understanding the molecular basis of fragile X syndrome. , 2000, Human molecular genetics.

[27]  G. Sudlow,et al.  Large-Scale Chromatin Unfolding and Remodeling Induced by VP16 Acidic Activation Domain , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  S. Warren,et al.  Acetylated histones are associated with FMR1 in normal but not fragile X-syndrome cells , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[29]  Alan P. Wolffe,et al.  Disruption of Higher-Order Folding by Core Histone Acetylation Dramatically Enhances Transcription of Nucleosomal Arrays by RNA Polymerase III , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[30]  S. Warren,et al.  Nuclease sensitivity of permeabilized cells confirms altered chromatin formation at the fragile X locus , 1996, Somatic cell and molecular genetics.

[31]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Identification of mutations leading to the Lesch-Nyhan syndrome by automated direct DNA sequencing of in vitro amplified cDNA. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.