Polycentric Regions: Comparing Complementarity and Institutional Governance in the San Francisco Bay Area, the Randstad and Emilia-Romagna

A gap in the literature that remains largely unfilled is a discussion of how polycentrism relates to broader tensions between strategies of specialised industrial agglomeration economies and diverse regional portfolios. Relatively little is known about how strategies of polycentrism relate to the industrial composition and economic complementarity both at the regional scale and for individual cities within the region. In this paper, correspondence analysis is used to quantify complementarity in the economic profiles of cities in three polycentric regions. The findings suggest that the degree of complementarity varies greatly but has decreased in all three of the case study regions over time. Subsequent analysis of institutional structures in these three regions suggests that regions with weaker regional governments, stronger regional identities and intentional polycentric development strategies might experience higher levels of complementarity. A series of hypotheses that relate institutions to complementarity are proposed as possible directions for future research.

[1]  N. Bailey,et al.  Central Scotland as a Polycentric Urban Region: Useful Planning Concept or Chimera? , 2001 .

[2]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[3]  P. Evans.  Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy , 1996 .

[4]  Polycentricism: Boon or barrier to metropolitan competitiveness? The case of the Randstad Holland , 2006 .

[5]  M. Scott.  The San Francisco Bay Area: A Metropolis in Perspective , 1985 .

[6]  Sebastiano Brusco.  The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration , 1982 .

[7]  F. Brioschi,et al.  Ownership linkages and business groups in industrial districts. The case of Emilia Romagna , 2004 .

[8]  P. Mohnen,et al.  Comparing the Innovation Performance in Canadian, French and German Manufacturing Enterprises , 2005 .

[9]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Trust in Large Organizations , 1996 .

[10]  T. W. Freeman,et al.  Megalopolis: The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States , 1962 .

[11]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  Differential potency of factors affecting innovation performance in manufacturing and services firms in Australia , 1996 .

[12]  J. Friedmann,et al.  THE URBAN FIELD , 1965 .

[13]  M. Hill.  Correspondence Analysis: A Neglected Multivariate Method , 1974 .

[14]  S. Davoudi.  EUROPEAN BRIEFING: Polycentricity in European spatial planning: from an analytical tool to a normative agenda , 2003 .

[15]  Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union , 1999 .

[16]  A. Rinaldi.  The Emilian Model Revisited: Twenty Years After , 2005 .

[17]  S. Clausen,et al.  Applied correspondence analysis , 1998 .

[18]  Roberto Zoboli,et al.  The Evolution of Industrial Districts Changing Governance, Innovation and Internationalisation of Local Capitalism in Italy , 2004 .

[19]  Peter Calthorpe,et al.  The Regional City , 2001 .

[20]  B. Giordano,et al.  Regions, City-Regions, Identity and Institution Building: Contemporary Experiences of the Scalar Turn in Italy and England , 2003 .

[21]  B. Derudder,et al.  World City Network: A global urban analysis , 2003 .

[22]  M. Pastor,et al.  Regions That Work: How Cities and Suburbs Can Grow Together , 2000 .

[23]  Michael Sonis,et al.  The hollowing out process in the Chicago economy, 1975-2011 , 2010 .

[24]  Frans M. Dieleman,et al.  Polynucleated regions in Northwest Europe , 1998 .

[25]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[26]  Luis Suarez-Villa,et al.  Operational Strategy, R&D and Intra-metropolitan Clustering in a Polycentric Structure: The Advanced Electronics Industries of the Los Angeles Basin , 1997 .

[27]  Bruce Appleyard,et al.  Job Accessibility as a Performance Indicator: An Analysis of Trends and Their Social Policy Implications in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1995 .

[28]  C. W. Morris.  Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism , 1995 .

[29]  R. Kloosterman,et al.  Clustering of Economic Activities in Polycentric Urban Regions: The Case of the Randstad , 2001 .

[30]  E. Meijers.  Polycentric Urban Regions and the Quest for Synergy: Is a Network of Cities More than the Sum of the Parts? , 2005 .

[31]  R. Camagni,et al.  Network Urban Structures in Northern Italy: Elements for a Theoretical Framework , 1993 .

[32]  N. Green.  Functional Polycentricity: A Formal Definition in Terms of Social Network Analysis , 2007 .

[33]  C. Sabel,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity , 1984 .

[34]  P. Bertolini,et al.  Regional Patterns in the Achievement of the Lisbon Strategy: a Comparison Between Polycentric Regions and Monocentric Ones , 2011 .

[35]  Stephen F. Knack,et al.  Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation , 1997 .

[36]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Efficient Urbanisation: Economic Performance and the Shape of the Metropolis , 2001 .

[37]  Lambert Van Der Laan,et al.  Changing Urban Systems: An Empirical Analysis at Two Spatial Levels , 1998 .

[38]  R. Putnam.  The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life , 1993 .

[39]  A. Amin.  The Emilian model: Institutional challenges , 1999 .

[40]  Naresh R. Pandit,et al.  The Role of Location in Knowledge Creation and Diffusion: Evidence of Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces in the City of London Financial Services Agglomeration , 2007 .

[41]  Francesca Governa,et al.  Italy and European spatial policies: polycentrism, urban networks and local innovation practices1 , 2005 .

[42]  R. Camagni.  The economic role and spatial contradictions of global city-regions: the functional, cognitive and evolutionary context , 2001 .

[43]  E. Howard.  Garden Cities Of To-Morrow , 1903 .

[44]  Hugo Priemus.  The Randstad and the Central Netherlands urban ring: Planners waver between two concepts , 1998 .

[45]  J. Leeuw,et al.  Correspondence Analysis, with Special Attention to the Analysis of Panel Data and Event History Data , 1989 .

[46]  R. Kloosterman,et al.  The Polycentric Urban Region: Towards a Research Agenda , 2001 .

[47]  E. Glaeser,et al.  An Economic Approach to Social Capital , 2000 .

[48]  R. Cervero,et al.  Polycentrism, Commuting, and Residential Location in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997, Environment & planning A.

[49]  Evert Meijers,et al.  Clones or Complements? The Division of Labour between the Main Cities of the Randstad, the Flemish Diamond and the RheinRuhr Area , 2007 .

[50]  J. Lambooy.  Polynucleation and economic development: The Randstad , 1998 .