An investigation of design studio performance in relation to creativity, spatial ability, and visual cognitive style

Abstract Design is a complex, multifaceted problem-solving activity involving various cognitive abilities. Creativity and spatial ability are considered critical in design process and outcomes, and visual cognitive style represents the potential of artistic and scientific creativity; however, little empirical research exists on their relationships and roles in design studio performance. This paper is an investigation of how one's creativity, spatial ability, and visual cognitive styles relate to design studio performance, measured by grade. Identifying students' cognitive abilities and their relation to design studio performance is important for the development of meaningful pedagogy and the holistic understanding of student capacities. Fifty-nine freshman architecture and interior design majors' creativity, spatial ability, and visual cognitive style were measured using the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, Mental Rotation Test, Paper Folding Test, the Architectural Spatial Ability Test, and the Object-Spatial Imagery Questionnaire, and compared with one another and with final grades in their design studio course. The effect of gender and academic major was investigated through a two-way ANOVA. The analysis revealed no correlations between studio course grade and the observed scores; but a positive correlation existed between general spatial abilities and visual cognitive styles. It also revealed males' outperformance in general spatial ability tasks and tendency of spatial visualizers. The results show that design studio performance cannot be measured and predicted directly by creativity, spatial ability, and visual cognitive style. The results highlight the necessity to develop measurement criteria of domain-specific creativity and spatial ability, and the importance of holistic understanding of student capacities and the nurturing process in education.

[1]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[2]  Massimiliano Palmiero,et al.  Domain-Specificity of Creativity: A Study on the Relationship Between Visual Creativity and Visual Mental Imagery , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[3]  John Zeisel,et al.  Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning. , 2006 .

[4]  A. Cropley.  In Praise of Convergent Thinking , 2006 .

[5]  Maria Kozhevnikov,et al.  The new object‐spatial‐verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement , 2009 .

[6]  Sajjad Nazidizaji,et al.  Does the smartest designer design better? Effect of intelligence quotient on students’ design skills in architectural design studio , 2015 .

[7]  Robert H. McKim,et al.  Experiences in Visual Thinking , 1972 .

[8]  D. Metzler,et al.  Mental rotation: effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task. , 1988, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[9]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Creativity research: Originality, utility, and integration , 1988 .

[10]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[11]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  An investigation of 2D and 3D spatial and mathematical abilities , 2006 .

[12]  Steven E. Stemler,et al.  Assessing mental flexibility with a new word recognition test , 2013 .

[13]  Gary R. Bertoline,et al.  Spatial Visualization Research and Theories: Their Importance in the Development of an Engineering and Technical Design Graphics Curriculum Model. , 1991 .

[14]  Kathryn Holliday-Darr,et al.  VIZ: The visualization assessment and training Web site , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[15]  M. Kozhevnikov,et al.  Creativity, visualization abilities, and visual cognitive style. , 2013, The British journal of educational psychology.

[16]  Aleksandra Gajda.  The relationship between school achievement and creativity at different educational stages , 2016 .

[17]  J. Guilford.  Three faces of intellect. , 1959 .

[18]  Haiying Long,et al.  More than appropriateness and novelty: Judges’ criteria of assessing creative products in science tasks , 2014 .

[19]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective , 2001, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[20]  I. Taylor.  Creativity : A Quarter Century of Progress , 2017 .

[21]  M. Karlins,et al.  Some factors related to architectural creativity in graduating architecture students. , 1969, The Journal of general psychology.

[22]  Michael A. Motes,et al.  Object-Spatial Imagery: A New Self-Report Imagery Questionnaire , 2006 .

[23]  Kyung H Kim.  Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT) , 2006 .

[24]  Chun-Heng Ho.  Spatial Cognition in Design , 2006 .

[25]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Individual Differences in Spatial Abilities , 2005 .

[26]  Michael A. Bunch.  Core Curriculum in Architectural Education , 1993 .

[27]  Charles Potter,et al.  SPATIAL ABILITY, VISUAL IMAGERY AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN ENGINEERING GRAPHICS , 2001 .

[28]  Kennon M. Smith,et al.  Conditions influencing the development of design expertise: As identified in interior design student accounts , 2015 .

[29]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  The thinking eye: visual re-cognition in design emergence , 2002 .

[30]  Susan Smith Barnard,et al.  Interior design creativity: the development and testing of a methodology for the consensual assessment of projects , 1992 .

[31]  April Allen,et al.  Complex Spatial Skills: The Link Between Visualization and Creativity , 2010 .

[32]  Kathryn H. Anthony,et al.  Design Juries on Trial: The Renaissance of the Design Studio , 1991 .

[33]  Ji Young Cho,et al.  Customization and Autonomy : Characteristics of the Ideal Design Studio Instructor in Design Education , 2013 .

[34]  M. G. McGee,et al.  Human spatial abilities: Sources of sex differences , 1979 .

[35]  M. van der Schoot,et al.  The developmental onset of symbolic approximation: beyond nonsymbolic representations, the language of numbers matters , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[36]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Everyone has creative potential. , 2004 .

[37]  Ömür Barkul,et al.  Gender and creative thinking in education: A theoretical and experimental overview , 2009 .

[38]  Sheryl A. Sorby,et al.  Developing 3-D Spatial Visualization Skills. , 1999 .

[39]  M. Linn,et al.  Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. , 1985, Child development.

[40]  N. Cross.  The Nature and Nurture of Design Ability , 1990 .

[41]  T. M. Amabile.  Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. , 1982 .

[42]  M. Peters,et al.  A Redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test - Different Versions and Factors That Affect Performance , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[43]  Anthony Williams,et al.  Implications of spatial abilities on design thinking , 2010 .

[44]  Davide Piffer,et al.  Can creativity be measured? An attempt to clarify the notion of creativity and general directions for future research , 2012 .

[45]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Commentary: Divergent Thinking Is Not Synonymous With Creativity , 2008 .

[46]  Andrys Onsman,et al.  Assessing creativity in a ‘New Generation’ architecture degree , 2016 .